Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cyrta, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Cyrta, J..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Harbingers of Aggressive Prostate Cancer: Precision Oncology Case Studies

Primary prostate cancer (PCa) can show marked molecular heterogeneity. However, systematic analyses comparing primary PCa and matched metastases in individual patients are lacking. We aimed to address the molecular aspects of metastatic progression while accounting for heterogeneity of primary PCa. In this pilot study, we collected 12 radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens from men who subsequently developed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We used histomorphology (Gleason grade, focus size, stage) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) (ERG and p53) to identify independent tumors and/or distinct subclones of primary PCa. We then compared molecular profiles of these primary PCa areas to matched metastatic samples using whole exome sequencing (WES) and amplicon-based DNA and RNA sequencing. Based on combined pathology and molecular analysis, seven (58%) RP specimens harbored monoclonal and topographically continuous disease, albeit with some degree of intra-tumor heterogeneity; four (33%) specimens showed true multifocal disease; and one displayed monoclonal disease with discontinuous topography. Early (truncal) events in primary PCa included SPOP p.F133V (one patient), BRAF p.K601E (one patient), and TMPRSS2:ETS rearrangements (nine patients). Activating AR alterations were seen in eight (67%) mCRPC patients, but not in matched primary PCa. Hotspot TP53 mutations, found in metastases from three patients, were readily present in matched primary disease. Alterations in genes encoding epigenetic modifiers were observed in several patients (either shared between primary foci and metastases or in metastatic samples only). WES-based phylogenetic reconstruction and/or clonality scores were consistent with the index focus designated by pathology review in six out of nine (67%) cases. The three instances of discordance pertained to monoclonal, topographically continuous tumors, which would have been considered as unique disease in routine practice. Overall, our results emphasize pathologic and molecular heterogeneity of primary PCa, and suggest that comprehensive IHC-assisted pathology review and genomic analysis are highly concordant in nominating the "index" primary PCa area.

cancer biology↗

The Genomic Landscape of Prostate Cancer Brain Metastases

Lethal prostate cancer commonly metastasizes to bone, lymph nodes, and visceral organs but with more effective therapies, there is an increased frequency of metastases to the brain. Little is known about the genomic drivers of prostate cancer brain metastases (PCBM). To address this, we conducted a comprehensive multi-regional, genomic, and targeted transcriptomic analysis of PCBM from 28 patients. We compared whole-exome and targeted RNA sequencing with matched primary tumors when available (n = 10) and with publicly available genomic data from non-brain prostate cancer metastases (n = 416). In addition to common alterations in TP53, AR, RB1, and PTEN, we identified highly significant enrichment of mutations in NF1 (25% cases (6/28), q = 0.049, 95% CI = 2.38 - 26.52, OR = 8.37) and RICTOR (17.9% cases (5/28), q = 0.01, 95% CI = 6.74 - 480.15, OR = 43.7) in PCBM compared to non-brain prostate cancer metastases, suggesting possible activation of the druggable pathways RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR, respectively. Compared to non-brain prostate cancer metastases, PCBM were almost three times as likely to harbor DNA homologous repair (HR) alterations (42.9% cases (12/28), p =0.016, 95% CI = 1.17 - 6.64, OR = 2.8). When considering the combination of somatic mutations, copy number alteration, and Large-scale State Transitions, 64.3% of patients (18/28) were affected. HR alterations may be critical drivers of brain metastasis that potentially provide cancer cells a survival advantage during re-establishment in a special microenvironment. We demonstrate that PCBM have genomic dependencies that may be exploitable through clinical interventions including PARP inhibition.

cancer biology↗

Role of Specialized mSWI/SNF Complexes in Prostate Cancer Lineage Plasticity

Advanced prostate cancer initially responds to hormonal treatment, but ultimately becomes resistant and requires more potent therapies. One mechanism of resistance observed in [~]10% of these patients is through lineage plasticity, which manifests in a partial or complete small cell or neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) phenotype. Here, we investigate the role of the mammalian SWI/SNF (mSWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex in NEPC. Using large patient datasets, patient-derived organoids and cancer cell lines, we identify mSWI/SNF subunits that are deregulated in NEPC and demonstrate that SMARCA4 (BRG1) overexpression is associated with aggressive disease. We also show that SWI/SNF complexes interact with different lineage-specific factors in NEPC compared to prostate adenocarcinoma. These data suggest a role for mSWI/SNF complexes in therapy-related lineage plasticity, which may be relevant for other solid tumors.

cancer biology↗

Discovery and reporting of clinically-relevant germline variants in advanced cancer patients assessed using whole-exome sequencing

PurposeIn precision cancer care, WES-based analysis of tumor-normal samples helps reveal somatic alterations but can also identify cancer-associated germline variants important for disease surveillance, treatment choice and cancer prevention. WES can also identify germline secondary findings impacting risk of cardiac, neurodegenerative or metabolic diseases. In patients with advanced cancer, the frequency of reportable secondary findings encountered with WES is not well defined.\n\nMethodsTo address this question, we analyzed a cohort of 343 patients with advanced, metastatic cancer for whom we have performed tumor and germline WES interrogating more than 21,000 genes using a CLIA/CLEP approved assay.\n\nResults17% of patients in our cohort have one or more reportable germline variants, including patients with pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The frequency of non-cancer clinically relevant germline variants (8.8%) was within the range of two control non-cancer cohorts (11.0% and 6.5%). The frequency of variants in cancer-associated genes was significantly higher (p<0.0005) in our advanced cancer cohort (8.2%) compared to control cohorts (2.7% and 3.8%). More than 50% of patients with reportable germline cancer variants had a family history of cancer.\n\nConclusionthese results stress the importance of returning germline results found during somatic genomic tumor testing.

genomics↗