Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Curtis, C. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Curtis, C. E..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Strategic allocation of working memory resource

Visual working memory (VWM), the brief retention of past visual information, supports a range of cognitive functions (Fukuda, Vogel, Mayr, & Awh, 2010; Johnson et al., 2013). The resource that supports VWM is limited, raising the question of how the brain allocates this limited resource to different objects. This question is even more interesting in ecological settings, in which objects are not equally important. In a psychophysical experiment, participants remembered the location of four targets with different probabilities of being tested after a delay. We then measured their memory accuracy of one of the targets. We found that participants allocated more resource to memoranda with higher priority, but underallocated resource to high- and overallocated to low-priority targets relative to the true probe probabilities. These results are well explained by a computational model in which resource is allocated to minimize expected estimation error. We replicated this finding in a second experiment in which participants bet on their memory fidelity after making the location estimate. The results of this experiment show that people 1) use information about memory quality and 2) minimize error even with an incentivized, alternative resource allocation strategy. Humans may mitigate the behavioral effects of a limited VWM through knowledge of memory fidelity and strategic resource allocation.

neuroscience

Distinct contributions by frontal and parietal cortices support working memory

Although subregions of frontal and parietal cortex both contribute and coordinate to support working memory (WM) functions, their distinct contributions remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that perturbations to topographically organized human frontal and parietal cortex during WM maintenance cause distinct but systematic distortions in WM. The nature of these distortions supports theories positing that parietal cortex mainly codes for retrospective sensory information, while frontal cortex codes for prospective action.\n\nAcknowledgementsThe US National Institutes of Health (R01 EY016407 to C.E.C.) and the National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship Program to W.E.M.) supported the research.\n\nAuthor ContributionsW.E.M and C.E.C. designed the experiment, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript.\n\nConflict of interestThe authors declare no competing financial interests.

neuroscience

Visual field map clusters in human frontoparietal cortex

The visual neurosciences have made enormous progress in recent decades, in part because of the ability to drive visual areas by their sensory inputs, allowing researchers to reliably define visual areas across individuals and across species. Similar strategies for parceling higher-order cortex have proven elusive. Here, using a novel experimental task and nonlinear population receptive field modeling we map and characterize the topographic organization of several regions in human frontoparietal cortex. We discover maps of both polar angle and eccentricity that are organized into clusters, similar to visual cortex, where multiple maps of polar angle of the contralateral visual field share a confluent fovea. This is striking because neural activity in frontoparietal cortex is believed to reflect higher-order cognitive functions rather than external sensory processing. Perhaps the spatial topography in frontoparietal cortex parallels the retinotopic organization of sensory cortex to enable an efficient interface between perception and higher-order cognitive processes. Critically, these visual maps constitute well-defined anatomical units that future study of frontoparietal cortex can reliably target.

neuroscience