Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Curtin, N. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Curtin, N. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Overcoming PARP inhibitor resistance by inducing a homologous recombination repair defective phenotype with ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors

PurposePARP inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in homologous recombination repair (HRR) defective (HRD) cancers. To (re)sensitise HRR proficient (HRP) tumours to PARPi combinations with other drugs are being explored. Our aim was to determine the mechanism underpinning the sensitisation to PARPi by inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinase ATR, CHK1 and WEE1. Experimental designA panel of HRD and HRP cells (including matched BRCA1 or 2 mutant and corrected pairs) and ovarian cancer ascites cells were used. Rucaparib (PARPi) induced replication stress (RS) and HRR (immunofluorescence microscopy for {gamma}H2AX and RAD51 foci, respectively), cell cycle changes (flow cytometry), activation of ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 (Western Blot for pCHK1S345, pCHK1S296 and pCDK1Y15, respectively) and cytotoxicity (colony formation assay) was determined, followed by investigations of the impact on all of these parameters by inhibitors of ATR (VE-821, 1 M), CHK1 (PF-477736, 50 nM) and WEE1 (MK-1775, 100 nM). ResultsRucaparib induced RS (3 to10-fold), S-phase accumulation (2-fold) and ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 activation (up to 3-fold), and VE-821, PF-477736 and MK-1775 inhibited their targets and abrogated these rucaparib-induced cell cycle changes in HRP and HRD cells. Rucaparib activated HRR in HRP cells only and was (60-1,000x) more cytotoxic to HRD cells. VE-821, PF-477736 and MK-1775 blocked HRR and sensitised HRP but not HRD cells and primary ovarian ascites to rucaparib. ConclusionsOur data indicate that, rather than acting via abrogation of cell cycle checkpoints, ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors cause an HRD phenotype and hence synthetic lethality with PARPi.

cancer biology↗

Differences in durability of PARP inhibition by clinically approved PARP inhibitors: implications for combinations and scheduling

Five PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for cancer treatment, they exploit cancer-specific defects in homologous recombination repair (HRR) to selectively kill tumour cells. Continuous PARP inhibition is required for single-agent anticancer activity. PARPi are also being investigated with ATR inhibitors clinically. We previously showed rucaparib caused prolonged PARP inhibition. Here we aimed to determine if this property was unique to rucaparib or common to other PARPis and the implications for scheduling with an ATR inhibitor (VE-821). Durability of PARP inhibition was determined at 0, 1, 24, 48 and 72 h after a 1 h pulse of 1M of rucaparib, olaparib, niraparib, talazoparib or pamiparib in IGROV-1 (human ovarian cancer) cells. Inhibition of PARP was sustained to a variable degree with all inhibitors, but reduced with time. Rucaparib caused the most persistent inhibition of PARP activity, which was maintained at [≥]75% for 72 h after drug withdrawal. In contrast, only 12% inhibition remained at this time with talazoparib and pamiparib and no detectable inhibition with olaparib and niraparib. Rucaparib enhanced VE-821 cytotoxicity to a similar extent in a sequential schedule as in co-exposure studies (PF50: 2.6 vs. 2.7) and there was even an approx. 2-fold enhancement after a 24 h delay between rucaparib and VE-821. Olaparib and niraparib produced similar enhancement of VE-821 cytotoxicity if co-exposed but were ineffective in sequential exposures. These data have clinical implications for both schedules of current PARPi monotherapy and the scheduling of PARPi in combination with ATRi and other cytotoxic drugs. Novelty and ImpactPARPi are a new class of anticancer agent. We demonstrate for the first time that 5 PARPi continue to suppress cellular PARP activity after drug removal to a variable extent. Rucaparib caused the most durable PARP inhibition, olaparib and niraparib the least. Rucaparib enhanced ATR inhibitor cytotoxicity in sequential and co-exposures, olaparib and niraparib were only active in co-exposure settings. These data have implications for the clinical use of PARPi, particularly in combination with other drugs.

pharmacology and toxicology↗