Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Culleton, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Culleton, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The Entwined African and Asian Genetic Roots of the Medieval Peoples of the Swahili Coast

The peoples of the Swahili coast of eastern Africa established a literate urban culture by the second millennium CE. They traded across eastern Africa and the Indian Ocean and were among the first sub-Saharan practitioners of Islam. An open question has been the extent to which these early interactions between Africans and non-Africans were accompanied by genetic admixture. We report genome-wide ancient DNA from 80 individuals in five medieval and early modern (1300-1800 CE) coastal towns, as well as people from an inland town postdating 1650 CE. Over half of the ancestry of most coastal individuals came from African ancestors; these African ancestors were primarily female. A slightly smaller proportion of ancestry was from Asia. This Asian component was approximately eighty to ninety percent from Near Eastern males and ten to twenty percent from Indian females. Peoples of African and Asian origins began to mix by around 1000 CE, a time when archaeological evidence documents changes on the coast that are often interpreted as marking the large-scale adoption of Islam. Before roughly 1500 CE, the Near Eastern ancestry detected in the individuals was mainly Persian-related, consistent with the narrative of the Kilwa Chronicle, the oldest history told by the Swahili themselves. After this time, the sources of Near Eastern ancestry became increasingly Arabian, consistent with the archaeological and historical evidence of growing interactions between the Swahili coast and parts of southern Arabia. Subsequent interactions of Swahili coast peoples with other Asian and African groups further changed the ancestry of present-day peoples relative to the ancient individuals we sequenced, highlighting how Swahili genetic legacies can be more clearly understood with ancient DNA.

genetics↗

Potential evolutionary body size reduction in a Malagasy primate (Propithecus verreauxi) in response to human size-selective hunting pressure

The Holocene arrival of humans on Madagascar precipitated major changes to the islands biodiversity. The now-extinct, endemic "subfossil" megafauna of Madagascar were likely hunted by the islands early human inhabitants. Perhaps in part due to preferential hunting of larger prey, no surviving species on Madagascar is larger than 10 kg. Outside of Madagascar, size-selective hunting pressure has resulted in the phyletic dwarfism of many still-living species across a diversity of phyla. On Madagascar, some subfossil bones of extant lemurs are considerably larger than those of the modern members of their species, but relatively large distances between the subfossil localities and modern samples that have been compared to date makes it impossible to reject the possibility that these size differences more simply reflect pre-existing ecogeographic variation. Here, we used high-resolution 3D scan data to conduct comparative morphological analyses of subfossil and modern skeletal remains of one of the larger extant lemurs, Verreauxs sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi) from subfossil and modern sites [~]10 km adjacent: Taolambiby (bones dated to 725-560 - 1075-955 cal. years before present) and Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, respectively. We found that the average subfossil sifaka bone (n=12) is 9% and significantly larger than that of modern sifakas (n=31 individuals; permutation test; p=0.037). When restricting the analysis to the single element and side with the largest representation in the subfossil sample (n=4 right distal femora), the average subfossil bone is 10% larger (p=0.046). While we cannot yet conclude whether this size difference reflects evolutionary change or an archaeological aggregation/taphonomic process, if this is a case of phyletic dwarfism in response to human size-selective harvesting pressures then the estimated rate of evolutionary change is slightly higher than that previously calculated for other archaeological cases of this phenomenon.

evolutionary biology↗