Crowley, T. M. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2018

Solving for X: evidence for sex-specific autism biomarkers across multiple transcriptomic studies

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a markedly heterogeneous condition with a varied phenotypic presentation. Its high concordance among siblings, as well as its clear association with specific genetic disorders, both point to a strong genetic etiology. However, the molecular basis of ASD is still poorly understood, although recent studies point to the existence of sex-specific ASD pathophysiologies and biomarkers. Despite this, little is known about how exactly sex influences the gene expression signatures of ASD probands. In an effort to identify sex-dependent biomarkers (and characterise their function), we present an analysis of a single paired-end post-mortem brain RNA-Seq data set and a meta-analysis of six blood-based microarray data sets. Here, we identify several genes with sex-dependent dysregulation, and many more with sex-independent dysregulation. Moreover, through pathway analysis, we find that these sex-independent biomarkers have substantially different biological roles than the sex-dependent biomarkers, and that some of these pathways are ubiquitously dysregulated in both post-mortem brain and blood. We conclude by synthesizing the discovered biomarker profiles with the extant literature, by highlighting the advantage of studying sex-specific dysregulation directly, and by making a call for new transcriptomic data that comprise large female cohorts.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Understanding sequencing data as compositions: anoutlook and review

MotivationAlthough seldom acknowledged explicitly, count data generated by sequencing platforms exist as compositions for which the abundance of each component (e.g., gene or transcript) is only coherently interpretable relative to other components within that sample. This property arises from the assay technology itself, whereby the number of counts recorded for each sample is constrained by an arbitrary total sum (i.e., library size). Consequently, sequencing data, as compositional data, exist in a non-Euclidean space that renders invalid many conventional analyses, including distance measures, correlation coefficients, and multivariate statistical models.\n\nResultsThe purpose of this review is to summarize the principles of compositional data analysis (CoDA), provide evidence for why sequencing data are compositional, discuss compositionally valid methods available for analyzing sequencing data, and highlight future directions with regard to this field of study.

bioinformatics↗