Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cross, C. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Cross, C. P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Linguistic laws are not the law in chimpanzee sexual solicitation gestures.

Two language laws have been identified as consistent patterns shaping animal behaviour, both acting on the organisational level of communicative systems. Zipfs law of brevity describes a negative relationship between behavioural length and frequency. Menzeraths law defines a negative correlation between the number of behaviours in a sequence and average length of the behaviour composing it. Both laws have been linked with the information-theoretic principle of compression, which tends to minimise code length. We investigated their presence in a case study of male chimpanzee sexual solicitation gesture. We failed to find evidence supporting Zipfs law of brevity, but solicitation gestures followed Menzeraths law: longer sequences had shorter average gesture duration. Our results extend previous findings suggesting gesturing may be limited by individual energetic constraints. However, such patterns may only emerge in sufficiently-large datasets. Chimpanzee gestural repertoires do not appear to manifest a consistent principle of compression previously described in many other close-range systems of communication. Importantly, the same signallers and signals were previously shown to adhere to these laws in subsets of the repertoire when used in play; highlighting that, in addition to selection on the signal repertoire, ape gestural expression appears shaped by factors in the immediate socio-ecological context.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Masculinity matters (but mostly if you're muscular): A meta-analysis of the relationships between sexually dimorphic traits in men and mating/reproductive success

Humans are sexually dimorphic: men and women differ in body build and composition, craniofacial structure, and voice pitch, likely mediated in part by developmental testosterone. Sexual selection hypotheses posit that, ancestrally, more masculine men may have acquired more mates and/or sired more viable offspring. Thus far, however, evidence for either association is unclear. Here, we meta-analyze the relationships between six masculine traits and mating/reproductive outcomes (96 studies, 474 effects, N = 177,044). Voice pitch, height, and testosterone all predicted mating; however, strength/muscularity was the strongest and only consistent predictor of both mating and reproduction. Facial masculinity and digit ratios did not significantly predict either. There was no clear evidence for any effects of masculinity on offspring viability. Our findings support arguments that strength/muscularity can be considered sexually selected in humans, but raise concerns over other forms of masculinity and highlight the need to increase tests of evolutionary hypotheses outside of industrialized populations.

evolutionary biology↗