Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Crofts, S. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Crofts, S. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Quantifying phenology in the deciduous tree and phytophagous insect system: a methodological comparison

The extent to which phenological synchrony between trophic levels may be disrupted by environmental change has been a topic of increased focus in recent years. Phenological associations between deciduous trees, phytophagous insects and their consumers (e.g. passerine birds) have become one of the model systems for understanding this process. However, most existing research reports population-level associations rather than examining the smaller spatial scales at which these trophic interactions occur. Furthermore, a variety of methods have been used to measure phenology, particularly on producers and primary consumers, with little formal comparison. To investigate how different methods of measuring producer and primary consumer phenology influence our understanding of these biological relationships at the appropriate scale, we quantified phenological metrics for individual host trees and the phytophagous insects that depend on them in a deciduous woodland during spring 2023. We sampled 170 trees from six deciduous species in Wytham Woods, UK, deriving nine metrics of phenology from five distinct field methods: multispectral drone imaging (NDVI), hemispherical canopy photography, and bud-scoring observations to track tree phenology, as well as water traps and frass traps to monitor insect herbivore phenology. We assessed the reliability of these methods within both trophic levels and across tree species. We further evaluated the extent to which tree phenology metrics correlated with herbivore phenology, at the level of individual trees, and links to variation in subsequent herbivory rates across a subsample of 72 oak trees (Quercus robur). Our results illustrate how methodological choices can affect our ability to study the timing of trophic interactions and reveal finescale spatiotemporal variation in phenology across both trophic levels. We discuss the implications of these results for considering how the scale-dependence of trophic interactions may stabilise populations and shape broader-scale responses to environmental change.

ecology↗

Unravelling effects of fine-scale changes within wild-bird flocks on sociality

O_LISocial structure and individual sociality impact a wide variety of behavioural and ecological processes. Although it is well known that changes in the physical and social environment shape sociality, how perturbations govern sociality at a fine spatial scale remains poorly understood. By applying automated experimental treatments to RFID-tracked wild great tits (Parus major) in a field experiment, we examined how individual social network metrics changed when food resources and social stability were experimentally manipulated at the within-group spatial scale. C_LIO_LIFirst, we examined how individual sociality responds when food resources changed from a dispersed distribution (50m apart) to a clustered distribution (1m apart). Second, we tested how sociality changed when individuals were restricted to feeding in a manner that mimics assortative behaviour within flocks. Third, we tested the effects of experimentally manipulating the stability of these social groupings. Finally, we returned the feeders to the original dispersed distribution to test whether effects carried over. C_LIO_LIRepeatability analyses showed consistent differences among individuals in their social phenotypes across the various manipulations; dyadic association preferences also showed consistency. Nevertheless, average flock size and social centrality measures increased after the food was clustered. Some of these metrics changed further when birds were then forced to feed from only one of the five clustered feeders. There was some support for group stability at individual feeders also impacting individual social network metrics: increase in flock size was more pronounced in the stable than the unstable group. Most of the differences in sociality were maintained when the food distribution returned to the dispersed pattern, and this was caused primarily by the change in resource distribution rather than the social manipulation. C_LIO_LIOur results show that perturbations in the access to resources and social group stability can change sociality at a surprisingly fine spatial scale. These small-scale changes could arise through a variety of mechanisms, including assortative positioning within groups due to, for instance, similarity among individuals in their preferences for different resource patches. Our results suggest that small-scale effects could lead to social processes at larger scales and yet are typically overlooked in social groups. C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗