Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Courts, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Courts, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

TrACES of Time: Towards estimating time-of-day of bloodstain deposition by targeted RNA sequencing

BackgroundIn forensic molecular biology, the main task consists of identifying individuals who contributed to biological traces recovered from (potential) crime scenes. However, to support evidence-based reconstruction of the course of activities having taken place at the scene, contextualising information regarding how and when a biological trace was deposited is oftentimes required. ResultsHere we present the development of a forensic molecular biological analysis procedure for the prediction of the time-of-day at which a bloodstain has been deposited by targeted quantification of selected mRNA markers. Time-of-day candidate prediction markers with diurnally rhythmic expression have previously been identified by whole transcriptome sequencing. Here, we build on our previous findings by establishing a targeted cDNA sequencing protocol on an Ion S5 massively parallel sequencing device for the targeted gene expression quantification of 74 time-of-day candidate prediction markers. Based on expression measurements of these markers in 408 blood samples (from 51 individuals deposited at eight time points over a day), we establish and compare different statistical methods to predict time of deposition. The most suitable model employing penalised regression achieved a root mean squared error of 3 hours and 44 minutes with 78 % of predictions being correct within +/- 4 h (evaluated by five-fold cross-validation). ConclusionsOur study provides the first prediction model for time-of-day of bloodstain deposition based on targeted RNA sequencing and thus represents an important step towards forensic trace deposition timing. It thereby relevantly contributes to the growing knowledge on Transcriptomic Analyses for the Contextualisation of Evidential Stains (TrACES).

molecular biology↗

Comparative Evaluation of Targeted RNA Sequencing Protocols for Gene Expression Quantification With and Without Unique Molecular Indices (UMIs)

Interest in forensic RNA analysis has increased over the last years. RNA molecules present in forensic samples can accurately be quantified via quantitative PCR (qPCR), however, due to the limited number of markers that can be assayed simultaneously per reaction, qPCR is less suitable for applications requiring gene expression quantification of large marker sets. Few years ago, massively parallel targeted RNA-sequencing (targRNAseq) allowing to simultaneously and accurately quantify several hundreds of markers has been added to the forensic genetic tool set. However, typical targRNAseq protocols include a multiplex-PCR-step to amplify selected targets which potentially introduces bias and limits accurate gene expression quantification. Unique Molecular Indices (UMIs) have been invented to overcome this limitation and have been implemented in protocols from some vendors. In this study, we compared two targeted RNAseq protocols assaying expression of a set of 121 forensically relevant mRNA biomarkers: The Ion Ampliseq targeted RNA sequencing panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific), which employs a multiplex-PCR without the use of UMIs, and the QIAseq targeted RNA panel (QIAGEN), which uses UMIs prior to multiplex amplification. Both protocols were tested on replicated samples and dilution series and compared with respect to sensitivity and accuracy of gene expression quantification. The UMI-based protocol exhibited decreased sensitivity in comparison to the non-UMI-based alternative, however, making use of UMI technology greatly improved gene expression quantification accuracy. We thus recommend the use of UMI-based protocols for targeted RNA sequencing for applications requiring accurate gene expression quantification.

molecular biology↗