Benchmarking active learning protocols for ligand binding affinity prediction
Active learning (AL) has become a powerful tool in computational drug discovery, enabling the identification of top binders from vast molecular libraries with reduced costs for relative binding free energy calculations and experiments. To design a robust AL protocol, it is important to understand the influence of AL parameters, as well as the features of the datasets on the outcomes. We use four affinity datasets for different targets (TYK2, USP7, D2R, Mpro) to systematically evaluate the performance of machine learning models (Gaussian Process model, Chemprop), sample selection protocols, as well as the batch size based on metrics describing the overall predictive power of the model (R2, Spearman rank, RMSE) as well as the accurate identification of top 2% / 5% binders (Recall, F1 score). Both models have a comparable Recall of top binders on large datasets, but the GP models surpass Chemprop when training data is sparse. A larger initial batch size, especially on diverse datasets, increased the Recall of both models as well as overall correlation metrics. However, for subsequent cycles, smaller batch sizes of 20 or 30 compounds proved to be desirable. Furthermore, the presence of Gaussian noise to the data, up to a certain threshold, still allowed the model to identify clusters with top-scoring compounds. However, excessive noise (<1{sigma}) did impact the models predictive and exploitative capabilities. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/568570v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cefb11org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c522bcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6b8f18org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17f7706_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOTOC GraphicC_FLOATNO C_FIG