Biology subjects

Corvin, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Corvin, A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Association between schizophrenia and both loss of function and missense mutations in paralog conserved sites of voltage-gated sodium channels

Sequencing studies have highlighted candidate sets of genes involved in schizophrenia, including activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (ARC) and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) complexes. Two genes, SETD1A and RBM12, have also been associated with robust statistical evidence. Larger samples and novel methods for identifying disease-associated missense variants are needed to reveal novel genes and biological mechanisms associated with schizophrenia. We sequenced 187 genes, selected for prior evidence of association with schizophrenia, in a new dataset of 5,207 cases and 4,991 controls. Included were members of ARC and NMDAR post-synaptic protein complexes, as well as voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels. We observed a significant case excess of rare (<0.1% in frequency) loss-of-function (LoF) mutations across all 187 genes (OR = 1.36; Pcorrected = 0.0072) but no individual gene was associated with schizophrenia after correcting for multiple testing. We found novel evidence that LoF and missense variants at paralog conserved sites were enriched in sodium channels (OR = 1.26; P = 0.0035). Meta-analysis of our new data with published sequencing data (11,319 cases, 15,854 controls and 1,136 trios) supported and refined this association to sodium channel alpha subunits (P = 0.0029). Meta-analysis also confirmed association between schizophrenia and rare variants in ARC (P = 4.0 x 10-4) and NMDAR (P = 1.7 x 10-5) synaptic genes. No association was found between rare variants in calcium channels and schizophrenia.\n\nIn one of the largest sequencing studies of schizophrenia to date, we provide novel evidence that multiple voltage-gated sodium channels are involved in schizophrenia pathogenesis, and increase the evidence for association between rare variants in ARC and NMDAR post-synaptic complexes and schizophrenia. Larger samples are required to identify specific genes and variants driving these associations.\n\nAuthor SummaryCommon and rare genetic variations are known to play a substantial role in the development of schizophrenia. Recently, sequencing studies have started to highlight specific sets of genes that are enriched for rare variation in schizophrenia, such as the synaptic gene sets ARC and NMDAR, as well as voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels. To confirm the role of these gene sets in schizophrenia, and identify specific risk genes, we sequenced 187 genes in a new sample of 5,207 schizophrenia cases and 4,991 controls. We find an excess of protein truncating mutations with a frequency <0.1% in all 187 targeted genes, and provide novel evidence that mutations altering amino acids conserved across sodium channel proteins are risk factors for schizophrenia. Through meta-analysing our new data with previously published sequencing data sets, for a total of 11,319 cases, 15,854 controls and 1,136 trios, we increase the evidence for association between rare coding variants and schizophrenia in voltage-gated sodium channels, as well as in synaptic gene sets ARC and NMDAR. Although no individual gene was associated with schizophrenia, these findings suggest larger studies will identify the specific genes driving these associations.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Genome-wide Association Study of Clinical Features in the Schizophrenia Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Confirmation of Polygenic Effect on Negative Symptoms

Schizophrenia is a clinically heterogeneous disorder. Proposed revisions in DSM - 5 included dimensional measurement of different symptom domains. We sought to identify common genetic variants influencing these dimensions, and confirm a previous association between polygenic risk of schizophrenia and the severity of negative symptoms. The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium study of schizophrenia comprised 8,432 cases of European ancestry with available clinical phenotype data. Symptoms averaged over the course of illness were assessed using the OPCRIT, PANSS, LDPS, SCAN, SCID, and CASH. Factor analyses of each constituent PGC study identified positive, negative, manic, and depressive symptom dimensions. We examined the relationship between the resultant symptom dimensions and aggregate polygenic risk scores indexing risk of schizophrenia. We performed genome - wide association study (GWAS) of each quantitative traits using linear regression and adjusting for significant effects of sex and ancestry. The negative symptom factor was significantly associated with polygene risk scores for schizophrenia, confirming a previous, suggestive finding by our group in a smaller sample, though explaining only a small fraction of the variance. In subsequent GWAS, we observed the strongest evidence of association for the positive and negative symptom factors, with SNPs in RFX8 on 2q11.2 (P = 6.27x10-8) and upstream of WDR72 / UNC13C on 15q21.3 (P = 7.59x10-8), respectively. We report evidence of association of novel modifier loci for schizophrenia, though no single locus attained established genome - wide significance criteria. As this may have been due to insufficient statistical power, follow - up in additional samples is warranted. Importantly, we replicated our previous finding that polygenic risk explains at least some of the variance in negative symptoms, a core illness dimension.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Proof Of Concept: Molecular Prediction Of Schizophrenia Risk

Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSTo what extent do global polygenic risk scores (PRS), molecular pathway-specific PRS, complement component (C4) gene expression, MHC loci, sex, and ancestry jointly contribute to risk for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SZ)?\n\nFindingsGlobal polygenic risk for schizophrenia, sex, and their interaction most robustly predict risk in a classification and regression tree model, with highest risk groups having 50/50 chance of SZ.\n\nMeaningPsychometric risk indicators, such as prodromal symptom assessments, may be enhanced by the examination of genetic risk metrics. Preliminary results suggest that of genetic risk metrics, global polygenic information has the most potential to significantly aide in the prediction of SZ.\n\nAbstractO_ST_ABSImportanceC_ST_ABSSchizophrenia (SZ) has a complex, heterogeneous symptom presentation with limited established associations between biological markers and illness onset. Many (gene) molecular pathways (MPs) are enriched for SZ signal, but it is still unclear how these MPs, global PRS, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) complement component (C4) gene expression, and MHC loci might jointly contribute to SZ and its clinical presentation. It is also unclear whether sex or ancestry interacts with these metrics to increase risk in certain individuals.\n\nObjectiveTo examine multiple genetic metrics, sex, and their interactions as possible predictors of SZ risk. Genetic information could aid in the clinical prediction of risk, but it is still unclear which genetic metrics are most promising, and how sex interacts with genetic risk metrics.\n\nDesign, Setting, and ParticipantsTo examine molecular risk in a proof-of-concept study, we used the Wellcome Trust case-control cohort and classified cases as a function of 1) polygenic risk score (PRS) for both whole genome and for 345 implicated molecular pathways, 2) predicted C4 expression, 3) SZ-relevant MHC loci, 4) sex, and 5) ancestry.\n\nMain Outcomes and MeasuresPRSs, C4 expression, SZ-relevant MHC loci, sex, and ancestry as joint risk factors for SZ.\n\nResultsRecursive partitioning yielded 15 molecular risk classes and retained as significant psychosis classifiers only sex, genome-wide SZ polygenic risk, and one MP PRS. Sex was the most robust classifier in a stepwise regression, and there was a significant interaction of sex with SZ PRS on case status, suggesting males have a lower polygenic risk threshold. By down-sampling case proportion to 1% and 1.4% population base rates in males and females, respectively, high-risk subtypes defined by this model had roughly a 52% odds of developing SZ (individuals with SZ PRS elevated by 2.6 SDs; incidence = 51.8%).\n\nConclusions and RelevanceThis proof-of-concept suggests that global SZ PRS, sex, and their interaction are robust predictors of risk and that males have a lower PRS threshold for onset. Implications for the integration of these metrics with psychometrically-identified risk are discussed.

genomics↗