Solving the Diagnostic Odyssey with Synthetic Phenotype Data
The space of possible phenotype profiles over the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) is combinatorially vast, whereas the space of candidate disease genes is far smaller. Phenotype-driven diagnosis is therefore highly non-bijective: many distinct symptom profiles can correspond to the same gene, but only a small fraction of the theoretical phenotype space is biologically and clinically plausible. When a structured ontology exists, this constraint can be exploited to generate realistic synthetic cases. We introduce GraPhens, a simulation framework that uses gene-local HPO structure together with two empirically motivated soft priors, over the number of observed phenotypes per case and phenotype specificity, to generate synthetic phenotype-gene pairs that are novel yet clinically plausible. We use these synthetic cases to train GenPhenia, a graph neural network that reasons over patient-specific phenotype subgraphs rather than flat phenotype sets. Despite being trained entirely on synthetic data, GenPhenia generalizes to real, previously unseen clinical cases and outperforms existing phenotype-driven gene-prioritization methods on two real-world datasets. These results show that when patient-level data are scarce but a structured ontology is available, principled simulation can provide effective training data for end-to-end neural diagnosis models.