Biology subjects

Cluff, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Cluff, T..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics

Humans exhibit lateralization such that most individuals typically show a preference for using one arm over the other for a range of movement tasks. The computational aspects of movement control leading to these differences in skill are not yet understood. It has been hypothesized that the dominant and non-dominant arms differ in terms of the use of predictive or impedance control mechanisms. However, previous studies present confounding factors that prevented clear conclusions: either the performances were compared across two different groups, or in a design in which asymmetrical transfer between limbs could take place. To address these concerns, we studied a reach adaptation task during which healthy volunteers performed movements with their right and left arms in random order. We performed two experiments. Experiment 1 (18 participants) focused on adaptation to the presence of a perturbing force field and Experiment 2 (12 participants) focused on rapid adaptations in feedback responses. The randomization of the left and right arm led to simultaneous adaptation, allowing us to study lateralization in single individuals with symmetrical and minimal transfer between limbs. This design revealed that participants were able to adapt control of both arms, and that adaptation was greater in the dominant arm than in the non-dominant. We also observed that the non-dominant arm showed a different control strategy compatible with robust control when adapting to the force field perturbation. EMG data showed that these differences in control were not caused by differences in co-contraction across the arms. Thus, instead of assuming differences in predictive or reactive control schemes, our data show that in the context of optimal control, both arms can adapt, and that the non-dominant arm uses a more robust, model-free strategy likely to compensate for less accurate internal representations of movement dynamics. Significance statementWe studied a reach adaptation task during which volunteers performed the task with their right and left arm randomly. The randomization of the arms allowed us to study lateralization in single individuals with symmetrical and minimal transfer between limbs. We observed a slightly greater adaptation of the dominant arm in the force applied to counter the perturbation. Moreover, the non-dominant arm showed a more robust control strategy when adapting to the force field perturbation, which enabled similar deviations despite faster movements. These interlimb differences were not caused by differences in co-contraction across the two arms. Our results suggest that both arms can adapt to the presence of a force field but the non-dominant arm uses a more robust, model-free strategy.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

The energetic basis for smooth human arm movements

The central nervous system plans human reaching movements with stereotypically smooth kinematic trajectories and fairly consistent durations. Smoothness seems to be explained by accuracy as a primary movement objective, whereas duration seems to economize energy expenditure. But the current understanding of energy expenditure does not explain smoothness, so that two aspects of the same movement are governed by seemingly incompatible objectives. Here we show that smoothness is actually economical, because humans expend more metabolic energy for jerkier motions. The proposed mechanism is an underappreciated cost proportional to the rate of muscle force production, for calcium transport to activate muscle. We experimentally tested that energy cost in humans (N=10) performing bimanual reaches cyclically. The empirical cost was then demonstrated to predict smooth, discrete reaches, previously attributed to accuracy alone. A mechanistic, physiologically measurable, energy cost may therefore explain both smoothness and duration in terms of economy, and help resolve motor redundancy in reaching movements.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Tradeoffs in optimal control capture patterns of human sensorimotor control and adaptation

Modern control theory highlights strategies that consider a range of factors, such as errors caused by environmental disturbances or inaccurate estimates of body or environmental dynamics. Here we reveal similar diversity in how humans naturally adapt and control their arm movements. We divided participants into groups based on how well they adapted to interaction loads during a single session of reaching movements. This classification revealed differences in how participants controlled their movements and responded to mechanical perturbations. Interestingly, variation in behaviour across good and partial adapters resembled simulations from stochastic and robust optimal feedback control, respectively, where the latter minimizes the effect of disturbances, including those introduced by inaccurate internal models of movement dynamics. In a second experiment, we varied the interaction loads over short time periods making it difficult to adapt. Under these conditions, participants who otherwise adapted well altered their behaviour and more closely resembled those using a robust control strategy. Taken together, the results suggest the diversity of how humans control and adapt their arm movements may reflect the accuracy of (or confidence in) their internal models. Our findings may open novel perspectives for interpreting motor behaviour in uncertain environments, or when neurologic dysfunction compromises motor adaptation.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Feedforward and feedback control share an internal model of the arm’s dynamics

Humans have a remarkable capacity to learn novel movement patterns in a wide variety of contexts. Recent work has shown that, when countering external forces, the nervous system adjusts not only voluntary (ie. feedforward) control but also reflex (ie. feedback) responses. Here we show that directly altering the physical properties of the arm (i.e. intersegmental dynamics) causes the nervous system to adjust feedforward control and that this learning also transfers to feedback responses even though they were never directly trained. In our first experiment, we altered intersegmental dynamics by asking participants to generate pure elbow movements with the shoulder joint either free to rotate or locked. Locking the shoulder joint cancels the interaction forces that arise at the shoulder during forearm rotation and thus removes the need to activate shoulder muscles to prevent shoulder joint rotation. We first asked whether the nervous system learns this altered mapping of intersegmental dynamics. In the baseline phase, we found robust activation of shoulder flexor muscles for pure elbow flexion trials prior to movement onset - as required to counter the intersegmental dynamics. After locking the shoulder joint in the adaptation phase, we found a substantial reduction in shoulder muscle activity over many trials. After unlocking the shoulder joint in the post-adaptation phase, we observed after-effects, as participants made systematic hand path errors. In our second experiment, we investigated whether such learning transfers to feedback control. Mechanical perturbations applied to the limb in the baseline phase revealed that feedback responses, like feedforward control, also appropriately countered intersegmental dynamics. In the adaptation phase, we found a substantial reduction in shoulder feedback responses - as appropriate for the altered intersegmental dynamics. We also found that this decay in shoulder feedback responses correlated across subjects with the amount of decay during feedforward control. Our work adds to the growing evidence that feedforward and feedback control share an internal model of the arms dynamics.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Compensating for intersegmental dynamics across the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints during feedforward and feedback control

Moving the arm is complicated by mechanical interactions that arise between limb segments. Such intersegmental dynamics cause torques applied at one joint to produce movement at multiple joints and, in turn, the only way to create single joint movement is by applying torques at multiple joints. Here, we investigated whether the nervous system accounts for intersegmental limb dynamics across the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints during self-initiated reaching and when countering external mechanical perturbations. Our first experiment tested whether the timing and amplitude of shoulder muscle activity accounts for interaction torques produced during single-joint elbow movements from different elbow initial orientations and over a range of movement speeds. We found that shoulder muscle activity reliably preceded movement onset and elbow agonist activity, and was scaled to compensate for the magnitude of interaction torques arising because of forearm rotation. Our second experiment tested whether elbow muscles compensate for interaction torques introduced by single-joint wrist movements. We found that elbow muscle activity preceded movement onset and wrist agonist muscle activity, and thus the nervous system predicted interaction torques arising because of hand rotation. Our third and fourth experiments tested whether shoulder muscles compensate for interaction torques introduced by different hand orientations during self-initiated elbow movements and when countering mechanical perturbations that caused pure elbow motion. We found that the nervous system predicted the amplitude and direction of interaction torques, appropriately scaling the amplitude of shoulder muscle activity during self-initiated elbow movements and rapid feedback control. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the nervous system robustly accounts for intersegmental dynamics, and that the process is similar across the proximal to distal musculature of the arm as well as between feedforward (i.e., self-initiated) and feedback (i.e., reflexive) control.\n\nNEW & NOTEWORTHYIntersegmental dynamics complicate the mapping between applied joint torques and the resulting joint motions. Here, we provide evidence that the nervous system robustly predicts these intersegmental limb dynamics across the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints during reaching and when countering external perturbations.

neuroscience↗