Clery, S. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2019

Easily adaptable head-free training system of macaques for tasks requiring precise measurements of eye position

We describe a modified system for training macaque monkeys without invasive head immobilization on visuomotor tasks requiring the control of eye-movements. The system combines a conventional primate chair, a chair-mounted infrared camera for measuring eye-movements and a custom-made concave reward-delivery spout firmly attached to the chair. The animal was seated head-free inside the chair but the concavity of the spout stabilized its head during task performance. Training on visual fixation and discrimination tasks was successfully performed with this system. Eye-measurements, such as fixation-precision, pupil size as well as micro-saccades were comparable to those obtained using conventional invasive head-fixation methods. The system is inexpensive ([~]$40 USD material cost), easy to fabricate in a workshop (technical drawings are included), and readily adjustable between animals without the need to immobilize or sedate them for these adjustments.\n\nHighlightsO_LIWe developed an approach to train macaque monkeys head-free on visuomotor tasks requiring measurements of eye position\nC_LIO_LIThe setup is inexpensive, easy to build, and readily adjusted to the animal without the need for sedation\nC_LIO_LIThe system was tested for training on a visual fixation and a visual discrimination task\nC_LIO_LIEye measurements (fixation precision, pupil size, microsaccades) were comparable to those from head-fixed animals\nC_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Using confidence inferred from pupil-size to dissect perceptual task-strategy: support for a bounded decision-formation process

During perceptual decisions subjects often rely more strongly on early rather than late sensory evidence even in tasks when both are equally informative about the correct decision. This early psychophysical weighting has been explained by an integration-to-bound decision process, in which the stimulus is ignored after the accumulated evidence reaches a certain bound, or confidence level. Here, we derive predictions about how the average temporal weighting of the evidence depends on a subjects decision-confidence in this model. To test these predictions empirically, we devised a method to infer decision-confidence from pupil size in monkeys performing a disparity discrimination task. Our animals data confirmed the integration-to-bound predictions, with different internal decision-bounds accounting for differences between animals. However, the data could not be explained by two alternative accounts for early psychophysical weighting: attractor dynamics either within the decision area or due to feedback to sensory areas, or a feedforward account due to neuronal response adaptation. This approach also opens the door to using confidence more broadly when studying the neural basis of decision-making.

neuroscience↗