Clauss, M. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2021

Apparent digestibility of captive colobines in relation to stomach types with special reference to fibre digestion

Colobine monkeys are known for the anatomical complexity of their stomachs, making them distinct within the primate order. Amongst foregut fermenters, they appear peculiar because of the occurrence of two different stomach types, having either three ( tripartite) or four ( quadripartite, adding the praesaccus) chambers. The functional differences between tri and quadripartite stomachs largely remain to be explained. In this study, we aim to compare the apparent digestibility (aD) in tripartite and quadripartite colobines. Hence, we measured the aD in two colobine species, Nasalis larvatus (quadripartite) and Trachypithecus cristatus (tripartite), in two zoos. We also included existing colobine literature data on the aD and analysed whether the aD of fibre components is different between the stomach types to test the hypothesis of whether quadripartite colobines show higher aD of fibre components than tripartite colobines did. Our captive N. larvatus specimen had a more distinctively varying nutrient intake across seasons with a larger seasonal variation in aD than that of a pair of T. cristatus, which mostly consumed commercial foods with a lower proportion of browse and less seasonal variation. We observed higher aD of dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) in the N. larvatus specimen, suggesting a higher gut capacity of N. larvatus provided by the additional praesaccus forestomach chamber. Based on the analysis of literature data for aD, we also found that quadripartite species achieved higher fibre digestibility at similar dietary fibre levels compared with tripartite species, supporting the hypothesis that the additional gut capacity offered by the praesaccus facilitates a longer retention and hence more thorough microbial fermentation of plant fibre.

zoology↗

bioRxiv2020

Macroscopic digestive anatomy of ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta), including a comparison of frozen and formalin-stored specimens

Digestive tract measurements are often considered species-specific, but little information exists on the degree to which they change during ontogeny within species. Additionally, access to anatomical material from nondomestic species is often limited, with fixed tissues possibly representing the only available source, though the degree at which this material is representative in terms of dimensions and weight is debatable. In the present study, the macroscopic digestive tract anatomy (length of intestinal portions, and tissue weights of stomach and intestines) of n=58 Lemur catta (from neonates to 25 years of age) was quantified, of which 27 had been stored frozen and 31 fixed in formalin. Particular attention was paid to the caecum and the possible presence of an appendix. The intraspecific allometric scaling of body mass (BM)0.46[0.40;0.51] for total intestine length and BM0.48[0.41;0.54] for small intestine length was higher than the expected geometric scaling of BM0.33, similar to literature results on interspecific scaling. This difference in scaling is usually explained by the hypothesis that the diameter of the intestinal tube cannot increase geometrically, to maintain optimal absorption. Therefore, geometric volume gain of increasing body mass is accommodated by more-than-geometric length scaling. Literature describes L. catta as being variable with respect to the presence of an appendix. No appendix was found in specimens of the present study. The proportions of length measurements did not change markedly during ontogeny, indicating that proportions developed in the foetus are already representative for the adult animal. By contrast, width and tissue-mass scaling of the caecum indicated a disproportionate growth of this organ during ontogeny that was not reflected in its length. Compared to overall intraspecific variation, the method of storage (frozen vs. formalin) had no relevant impact on length or weight measurements.

zoology↗