Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Clairmont, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Clairmont, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

REV1 Coordinates a Multi-Faceted Tolerance Response to DNA Alkylation Damage and Prevents Chromosome Shattering in Drosophila melanogaster

When replication forks encounter damaged DNA, cells utilize DNA damage tolerance mechanisms to allow replication to proceed. These include translesion synthesis at the fork, postreplication gap filling, and template switching via fork reversal or homologous recombination. The extent to which these different damage tolerance mechanisms are utilized depends on cell, tissue, and developmental context-specific cues, the last two of which are poorly understood. To address this gap, we have investigated damage tolerance responses following alkylation damage in Drosophila melanogaster. We report that translesion synthesis, rather than template switching, is the preferred response to alkylation-induced damage in diploid larval tissues. Furthermore, we show that the REV1 protein plays a multi-faceted role in damage tolerance in Drosophila. Drosophila larvae lacking REV1 are hypersensitive to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and have highly elevated levels of {gamma}-H2Av foci and chromosome aberrations in MMS-treated tissues. Loss of the REV1 C-terminal domain (CTD), which recruits multiple translesion polymerases to damage sites, sensitizes flies to MMS. In the absence of the REV1 CTD, DNA polymerases eta and zeta become critical for MMS tolerance. In addition, flies lacking REV3, the catalytic subunit of polymerase zeta, require the deoxycytidyl transferase activity of REV1 to tolerate MMS. Together, our results demonstrate that Drosophila prioritize the use of multiple translesion polymerases to tolerate alkylation damage and highlight the critical role of REV1 in the coordination of this response to prevent genome instability. Author SummaryOrganisms have evolved several ways to continue copying their DNA when it is damaged, grouped into the categories of translesion synthesis and template switching. These damage tolerance mechanisms prevent replication forks from collapsing when they encounter DNA damage and prevent catastrophic genome instability and cell death. While the proteins and pathways involved in damage tolerance are beginning to be understood at the single cell level, how they are regulated in multicellular organisms is an intriguing question. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms by which Drosophila tolerate alkylation damage during their development. We discovered that tissues containing rapidly dividing diploid cells favor translesion synthesis over template switching, preferentially utilizing different translesion polymerases in a context-dependent manner. Furthermore, we showed that the REV1 protein, best known for its role in recruiting translesion DNA polymerases to damage sites, performs multiple functions during damage tolerance. Together, our results demonstrate that damage tolerance preferences for multicellular organisms may differ from those observed in cultured cells, and establish Drosophila as a useful model system for studying tolerance mechanisms.

molecular biology↗

REV7/FANCV Binds to CHAMP1 and Promotes Homologous Recombination Repair

A critical determinant of DNA repair pathway choice is the HORMA protein REV7, a small abundant adaptor which binds to various DNA repair proteins through its C-terminal seatbelt domain. The REV7 seatbelt binds to the REV3 polymerase to form the Polymerase {zeta} complex, a positive regulator of translesion synthesis (TLS) repair. Alternatively, the REV7 seatbelt binds to SHLD3 in the Shieldin complex, a positive regulator of NHEJ repair. Recent studies have identified another novel REV7 seatbelt-binding protein, CHAMP1 (Chromosome Alignment-Maintaining Phosphoprotein, though its role in DNA repair is unknown. Here, we show that the REV7-CHAMP1 complex promotes homologous recombination (HR) repair by sequestering REV7 from the Shieldin complex. CHAMP1 competes directly with the SHLD3 subunit of the Shieldin complex for a limited pool of C-REV7, thereby inhibiting the REV7-mediated recruitment of the SHLD2 and SHLD1 effector subunits to DNA double strand breaks. CHAMP1 thereby channels DNA repair away from error-prone NHEJ and towards the competing error-free HR pathway. Similarly, CHAMP1 competes with the REV3 component of the POL{zeta} complex, thereby reducing the level of mutagenic TLS repair. CHAMP1 interacts with POGZ in a heterochromatin complex further promoting HR repair. Importantly, in human tumors, CHAMP1 overexpression promotes HR, confers PARP inhibitor resistance, and correlates with poor prognosis. Thus, by binding to either REV3, SHLD3, or CHAMP1 through its seatbelt, the REV7 protein can promote either TLS repair, NHEJ repair, or HR repair respectively.

molecular biology↗