Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Civier, O.

Publications and source records attributed to Civier, O..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A functional-structural connectivity metric detects ipsilateral connections with distinct functional specialisation in each hemisphere

We introduce a connectomics metric that integrates information on structural connectivity (SC) from diffusion MRI tractography and functional connectivity (FC) from resting-state functional MRI, at individual subject level. The metric is based on the ability of SC to broadly predict FC using a simple linear predictive model; for each connection in the brain, the metric quantifies the deviation from that model. For the metric to capture underlying physiological properties, we minimise systematic measurement errors and processing biases in both SC and FC, and address several challenges with the joint analysis. This also includes a data-driven normalisation approach. The combined metric may provide new information by indirectly assessing white matter structural properties that cannot be inferred from diffusion MRI alone, and/or complex interregional neural interactions that cannot be inferred from functional MRI alone. To demonstrate the utility of the metric, we used young adult data from the Human Connectome Project to examine all bilateral pairs of ipsilateral connections, i.e. each left-hemisphere connection in the brain was paired with its right-hemisphere homologue. We detected a minority of bilateral pairs where the metric value is significantly different across hemispheres, which we suggest reflects cases of ipsilateral connections that have distinct functional specialisation in each hemisphere. The pairs with significant effects spanned all cortical lobes, and also included several cortico-subcortical connections. Our findings highlight the potential in a joint analysis of structural and functional measures of connectivity, both for clinical applications and to help in the interpretation of results from standard functional connectivity analysis. Significance StatementBased on the notion that structure predicts function, the scientific community sought to demonstrate that structural information on fibre bundles that connect brain regions is sufficient to estimate the strength of interregional interactions. However, an accurate prediction using MRI has proved elusive. This paper posits that the failure to predict function from structure originates from limitations in measurement or interpretation of either diffusion MRI (to assess fibre bundles), fMRI (to assess functional interactions), or both. We show that these limitations can be nevertheless beneficial, as the extent of divergence between the two modalities may reflect hard-to-measure properties of interregional connections, such as their functional role in the brain. This provides many insights, including into the division of labour between hemispheres.

neuroscience↗

Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes?

Recent advances in diffusion MRI tractography permit the generation of dense weighted structural connectomes that offer greater insight into brain organization. However, these efforts are hampered by the lack of consensus on how to extract topological measures from the resulting graphs. Here we evaluate the common practice of removing the graphs weak connections, which is primarily intended to eliminate spurious connections and emphasize strong connections. Because this processing step requires arbitrary or heuristic-based choices (e.g., setting a threshold level below which connections are removed), and such choices might complicate statistical analysis and inter-study comparisons, in this work we test whether removing weak connections is indeed necessary. To this end, we systematically evaluated the effect of removing weak connections on a range of popular graph-theoretical metrics. Specifically, we investigated if (and at what extent) removal of weak connections introduces a statistically significant difference between two otherwise equal groups of healthy subjects when only applied to one of the groups. Using data from the Human Connectome Project, we found that removal of weak connections had no statistical effect even when removing the weakest ~70-90% connections. Removing yet a larger extent of weak connections, thus reducing connectivity density even further, did produce a predictably significant effect. However, metric values became sensitive to the exact connectivity density, which has ramifications regarding the stability of the statistical analysis. This pattern persisted whether connections were removed by connection strength threshold or connectivity density, and for connectomes generated using parcellations at different resolutions. Finally, we showed that the same pattern also applies for data from a clinical-grade MRI scanner. In conclusion, our analysis revealed that removing weak connections is not necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted connectomes. Because removal of weak connections provides no practical utility to offset the undesirable requirement for arbitrary or heuristic-based choices, we recommend that this step is avoided in future studies. Declarations of interestnone.

neuroscience↗