Biology subjects

Churchill, E. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Churchill, E. R..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Female fruit flies use social cues to make egg clustering decisions

BackgroundThe ability to respond plastically to environmental variation is a key determinant of fitness. Females may use cues to strategically place their eggs, for example adjusting the number or location of eggs according to whether other females are present, driving the dynamics of local competition or cooperation. The expression of plasticity in egg laying patterns within individual patches, i.e., in contact clusters or not, represents an additional, under-researched and potentially important opportunity for fitness gains. Clustered eggs might benefit from increased protection or defence, and clustering could facilitate cooperative feeding. However, increased clustering is also expected to increase the risk of over-exploitation through direct competition. These potential benefits and costs likely covary with the number of individuals present, hence egg clustering behaviour within resource patches should be socially responsive. We investigate this new topic using the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. ResultsOur mathematical model, parameterised by data, verified that females cluster their eggs non-randomly, and increase clustering as group size increases. We also showed that, as the density of adult females increased, females laid more eggs, laid them faster, and laid more eggs in clusters. Females also preferred to place eggs within existing clusters. Most egg clusters were of mixed maternity. ConclusionsCollectively, the results reveal that females actively express plasticity in egg clustering according to social environment cues and prefer to lay in clusters of mixed maternity, despite the potential for increased competition. These findings are consistent with egg clustering plasticity being selected due to public goods-related benefits.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2024

Female oviposition decisions are influenced by the microbial environment

In ovipositing animals, egg placement decisions can be key determinants of offspring survival. One oviposition strategy reported across taxa is egg clustering, whereby a female lays multiple eggs next to one another or next to the eggs of other females. The fitness benefits of egg clustering, especially in mixed maternity clusters, are unknown. In some species, mothers provision eggs with diffusible defence compounds, such as antimicrobials, raising the possibility of public good benefits arising from egg clustering. Here we report that Drosophila melanogaster females frequently lay eggs in mixed maternity clusters. We tested two hypotheses for potential drivers of this oviposition behaviour: (i) the microbial environment affects fecundity and egg placement in groups of D. melanogaster females; (ii) D. melanogaster eggs exhibit antimicrobial activity. The results partially supported the first hypothesis. Females exposed to environmental microbes that naturally colonised the oviposition substrates in the absence of antimicrobial preservatives reduced their levels of fecundity but did not significantly alter egg clustering. In contrast, the presence of commensal (fly-associated) microbes did not affect oviposition. The second hypothesis was not supported. There was no evidence of antimicrobial activity, either in whole eggs or in soluble surface material extracted from them. In conclusion, while there was no evidence that oviposition decisions are shaped by the opportunity to share antimicrobials, there is evidence that the microbial environment provides cues that females use to make sophisticated decisions on fecundity and egg placement.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Social and physical environment independently affect oviposition decisions in Drosophila melanogaster

In response to environmental stimuli, including variation in the presence of conspecifics, animals show highly plastic responses in behavioural and physiological traits influencing reproduction. These responses have been extensively documented in males, but equivalent study of females is so far lacking. We expect females to be highly responsive to environmental variation, with significant impacts on fitness given females direct impact on offspring number, size, and developmental conditions. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a model, we manipulate (a) exposure to conspecific females, expected to influence their expectation of number of potential mates and larval density for their own offspring, and (b) test how prior consexual population density interacts with the spatial distribution of potential oviposition sites, with females expected to prefer clustered food resources that can support a larger number of eggs and larvae. After exposure to competition, females were slower to start copulating and reduced their copulation duration - the opposite effect to that observed in males previously exposed to rivals. There was a parallel and perhaps related effect on egg production, with females previously housed in groups laying fewer eggs than those that were housed in solitude. The spatial distribution of resources also influenced oviposition behaviour: females clearly preferred aggregated patches of substrate, being more likely to lay, and laying on more of the available patches, in the clustered environment. However, we found no significant interaction between prior housing conditions and resource patchiness, indicating that females did not perceive the value of different resource distributions differently when they were expecting either high or low levels of larval competition. While exposure to consexual competition influences copulatory behaviours, it is the distribution of oviposition resources that has a greater impact on oviposition decisions.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2020

Spatially clustered resources increase aggregation and mating duration in Drosophila melanogaster

In environments where females mate multiply, males should adjust their behaviour and physiology in response to the prevailing perceived level of sperm competition. This expectation is well supported by both laboratory and field studies, but we dont yet know what mechanisms facilitate these plastic responses in natural populations. One way in which males appear to assess sperm competition risk is through encounter rates with conspecific males. Such encounter rates may be driven by the spatial distribution of resources required by male. However, explicit links between resource distribution, male encounter rate, and shifts in behaviour related to sperm competition have not been demonstrated. Here we show that a small increase in the distance of patches of food resources in the laboratory: (a) approximately halves the mean distances between pairs of males; and (b) is associated with an increase in subsequent copulation duration - previously shown to be a reliable indicator of male perception of sperm competition risk - by more than two minutes. Aggregation of resources, operating via increased encounter rate, is a mechanism that can stimulate plastic male sperm competition responses. Because spatial distribution of resources, including those exploited by Drosophila, is variable in nature, this may explain one way in which sperm competition-related plasticity is influenced in wild-living males.

animal behavior and cognition↗