Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Chui, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Chui, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Automated tumor immunophenotyping predicts clinical benefit from anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy

BackgroundCancer immunotherapy has transformed the clinical approach to patients with malignancies as profound benefits can be seen in a subset of patients. To identify this subset, biomarker analyses increasingly focus on phenotypic and functional evaluation of the tumor microenvironment (TME) to determine if density, spatial distribution, and cellular composition of immune cell infiltrates can provide prognostic and/or predictive information. Attempts have been made to develop standardized methods to evaluate immune infiltrates in the routine assessment of certain tumor types; however, broad adoption of this approach in clinical decision-making is still missing. MethodsWe developed approaches to categorize solid tumors into "Desert", "Excluded" and "Inflamed" types according to the spatial distribution of CD8+ immune effector cells to determine the prognostic and/or predictive implications of such labels. To overcome the limitations of this subjective approach we incrementally developed four automated analysis pipelines of increasing granularity and complexity for density and pattern assessment of immune effector cells. ResultsWe show that categorization based on "manual" observation is predictive for clinical benefit from anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) therapy in two large cohorts of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). For the automated analysis we demonstrate that a combined approach outperforms individual pipelines and successfully relates spatial features to pathologist-based read-outs and patient response to therapy. ConclusionsOur findings suggest tumor immunophenotype (IP) generated by automated analysis pipelines should be evaluated further as potential predictive biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy. What is already known on this topicClinical benefit from checkpoint inhibitor-targeted therapies is realized only in a subset of patients. Robust biomarkers to identify patients who may respond to such therapies are needed. What this study addsWe have developed manual and automated approaches to categorize tumors into immunophenotypes based on the spatial distribution of CD8+ T effector cells that predict clinical benefit from anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer or triple-negative breast cancer. How this study might affect research, practice or policyTumor immunophenotypes should be further validated as predictive biomarker for checkpoint inhibitor-targeted therapies in prospective clinical studies.

pathology↗

Is Drosophila melanogaster Stress Odorant (dSO) really an alarm pheromone?

Social interactions are crucial for the reproduction and survival of many organisms, including those using visual, auditory and olfactory cues to signal the presence of danger. Drosophila melanogaster emits an olfactory alarm signal, termed the Drosophila stress odorant (dSO) in response to mechanical agitation or electric shock, and conspecifics avoid areas previously occupied by stressed individuals. However, the contextual, genetic and neural underpinnings of the emission of, and response to dSO, have received little attention. Using a binary choice assay, we determined that neither age and sex of emitters, nor the time of the day, affected the emission or avoidance of dSO. However, both sex and mating status affected the response to dSO. We also demonstrated that dSO was not species specific so it should not be considered a pheromone but a general alarm signal for Drosophila. However, the response levels to both intra and inter-specific cues differed between species and possible reasons for these differences are discussed. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIEmission of dSO, a highly volatile chemical blend emitted by stressed flies, is not context specific C_LIO_LIResponse to dSO is context specific, affected by factors such as age and mating status. C_LIO_LIAs flies respond to volatiles for stressed heterospecifics, dSO should not be considered an alarm pheromone, but as an alarm cue. C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗