Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Chudzik, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Chudzik, K..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Reconfiguration of genome-lamina interactions marks the commissioning of limb cell-fates

Diverse forms of heterochromatin block inappropriate transcription and safeguard differentiation and cell identity. Yet, how and when heterochromatin is reconfigured to facilitate changes in cell- fate remains a key open question. Here, we address this by mapping a prevalent heterochromatic feature - genome-lamina interactions - relative to transcription in single-cells during mouse embryogenesis. We find that genome-lamina interactions remain relatively uniform between germ layers following gastrulation but are extensively reconfigured in diverse tissues during later organogenesis. Focusing on limb development, we demonstrate that genome-lamina interactions are selectively released in early multipotent progenitors at key developmental genes and their surrounding regulatory domains. This "lamina-release" often precedes gene expression at later developmental stages, suggesting it primes regulatory domains for future potential activation. Conversely, lamina-release coincides with chromatin opening at sites of crucial limb transcription factor binding, and so is closely intertwined with the regulatory machinery driving limb formation. Finally, we show that the boundaries of topologically-associated domains (TADs) constrain the spread of lamina-release at a limb gene locus. This ensures independent lamina dynamics between neighbouring domains. Together, our data suggest a previously unrecognised process where genome-lamina interactions are selectively released at regulatory domains to transition loci toward more permissive chromatin states, thereby potentiating cell type specific activation. Our work thus reveals how systematic heterochromatin reorganization links to developmental multipotency, providing mechanistic insights into cell-fate decisions in vivo.

developmental biology↗

Ab-trapping - a peripheral staining artifact in antibody-based microscopy and genomics

Antibodies (Ab) are essential for detecting specific epitopes in microscopy and genomics, but can produce artifacts leading to erroneous interpretations. Here, we characterize a novel artifact, Ab-trapping, in which antibodies bind at the periphery of a cellular structure and do not diffuse further into its interior. This causes anomalous peripheral staining for multiple critical targets, including endogenous or ectopically expressed nuclear proteins like nucleolar proteins, histone variants and their modifications like H3K9me2. Ab-trapping can affect any assay relying on Ab diffusion, including immunofluorescence microscopy and recent genomics approaches like CUT&Tag. Critically, computational modeling and experimental validation reveal that Ab-trapping is caused by high epitope abundance, high Ab affinity, and low diffusion rates. Consequently, its effects can be mitigated by using alternative Abs and optimizing incubation conditions. Ab-trapping is therefore a considerable artifact that should be considered when designing experiments and interpreting results.

cell biology↗

Promoter repression and 3D-restructuring resolves divergent developmental gene expression in TADs

Cohesin loop extrusion facilitates precise gene expression by continuously driving promoters to sample all enhancers located within the same topologically-associated domain (TAD). However, many TADs contain multiple genes with divergent expression patterns, thereby indicating additional forces further refine how enhancer activities are utilised. Here, we unravel the mechanisms enabling a new gene, Rex1, to emerge with divergent expression within the ancient Fat1 TAD in placental mammals. We show that such divergent expression is not determined by a strict enhancer-promoter compatibility code, intra-TAD position or nuclear envelope-attachment. Instead, TAD-restructuring in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) separates Rex1 and Fat1 with distinct proximal enhancers that independently drive their expression. By contrast, in later embryonic tissues, DNA methylation renders the inactive Rex1 promoter profoundly unresponsive to Fat1 enhancers within the intact TAD. Combined, these features adapted an ancient regulatory landscape during evolution to support two entirely independent Rex1 and Fat1 expression programs. Thus, rather than operating only as rigid blocks of co-regulated genes, TAD-regulatory landscapes can orchestrate complex divergent expression patterns in evolution. HIGHLIGHTSO_LINew genes can emerge in evolution without taking on the expression pattern of their surrounding pre-existing TAD. C_LIO_LICompartmentalisation can restructure seemingly evolutionarily stable TADs to control a promoters access to enhancers. C_LIO_LILamina-associated domains neither prevent transcriptional activation nor enhancer-promoter communication. C_LIO_LIRepression rather than promoter-specificity refines when genes respond to promiscuous enhancer activities in specific tissues. C_LI

genetics↗