Biology subjects

Chowdhury, N. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Chowdhury, N. S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

A 5-day course of rTMS before pain onset ameliorates future pain and increases sensorimotor peak alpha frequency

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promise as an intervention for pain. An unexplored research question is whether the delivery of rTMS prior to pain onset might protect against a future episode of prolonged pain. The present study aimed to determine i) whether 5 consecutive days of rTMS delivered prior to experimentally-induced prolonged jaw pain could reduce future pain intensity and ii) whether any effects of rTMS on pain were mediated by changes in corticomotor excitability (CME) and/or sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF). On each day from Day 0-4, forty healthy individuals received a single session of active (n = 21) or sham (n = 19) rTMS over the left primary motor cortex. PAF and CME were assessed on Day 0 (before rTMS) and Day 4 (after rTMS). Prolonged pain was induced via intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) in the right masseter muscle after the final rTMS session. From Days 5-25, participants completed twice-daily electronic dairies including pain on chewing and yawning (primary outcomes), as well as pain during other activities (e.g. talking), functional limitation in jaw function and muscle soreness (secondary outcomes). Compared to sham, individuals who received active rTMS subsequently experienced lower pain on chewing and yawning. Although active rTMS increased PAF, the effects of rTMS on pain were not mediated by changes in PAF or CME. This study is the first to show that rTMS delivered prior to pain onset can protect against future pain and associated functional impairment. Thus, rTMS may hold promise as a prophylactic intervention for persistent pain.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

POSTERIOR-SUPERIOR INSULA REPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION REDUCES EXPERIMENTAL TONIC PAIN AND PAIN-RELATED CORTICAL INHIBITION IN HUMANS

High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the posterosuperior insula (PSI) may produce analgesic effects. However, the neuroplastic changes behind PSI-rTMS analgesia remain poorly understood. The present study aimed to determine whether tonic capsaicin-induced pain and cortical inhibition (indexed using TMS-electroencephalography) are modulated by PSI-rTMS. Twenty healthy volunteers (10 females) attended two sessions randomized to active or sham rTMS. Experimental pain was induced by capsaicin administered to the forearm for 90 minutes, with pain ratings collected every 5 minutes. Left PSI-rTMS was delivered (10Hz, 100 pulses per train, 15 trains) [~]50 minutes post-capsaicin administration. TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) and thermal sensitivity were assessed at baseline, during capsaicin pain prior to rTMS and after rTMS. Bayesian evidence of reduced pain scores and increased heat pain thresholds were found following active rTMS, with no changes occurring after sham rTMS. Pain (prior to active rTMS) led to an increase in the frontal negative peak [~]45 ms (N45) TEP relative to baseline. Following active rTMS, there was a decrease in the N45 peak back to baseline levels. In contrast, following sham rTMS, the N45 peak was increased relative to baseline. We also found that the reduction in pain NRS scores following active vs. sham rTMS was partially mediated by decreases in the N45 peak. These findings provide evidence of the analgesic effects of PSI-rTMS and suggest that the TEP N45 peak is a potential marker and mediator of both pain and analgesia.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Alterations in cortical excitability during pain: A combined TMS-EEG Study

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to examine inhibitory and facilitatory circuits during experimental pain and in chronic pain populations. However, current applications of TMS to pain have been restricted to measurements of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from peripheral muscles. Here, TMS was combined with electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether experimental pain could induce alterations in cortical inhibitory/facilitatory activity observed in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). In Experiment 1 (n = 29), multiple sustained thermal stimuli were administered to the forearm, with the first, second and third block of thermal stimuli consisting of warm but non-painful (pre-pain block), painful (pain block) and warm but non-painful (post-pain block) temperatures respectively. During each stimulus, TMS pulses were delivered while EEG (64 channels) was simultaneously recorded. Verbal pain ratings were collected between TMS pulses. Relative to pre-pain warm stimuli, painful stimuli led to an increase in the amplitude of the frontocentral negative peak [~]45ms post-TMS (N45), with a larger increase associated with higher pain ratings. Experiments 2 and 3 (n = 10 in each) showed that the increase in the N45 in response to pain was not due to changes in sensory potentials associated with TMS, or a result of stronger reafferent muscle feedback during pain. This is the first study to use combined TMS-EEG to examine alterations in cortical excitability in response to pain. These results suggest that the N45 TEP peak, which indexes GABAergic neurotransmission, is implicated in pain perception and is a potential marker of individual differences in pain sensitivity.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

The influence of somatosensory and auditory evoked potentials on concurrent transcranial-magnetic stimulation electroencephalography recordings

BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evoked potentials (TEPs) can be used to index cortical excitability. However, it remains unclear to what extent TEPs reflect somatosensory and auditory-evoked potentials which arise from the scalp sensation and click of the TMS coil, as opposed to transcranial stimulation of cortical circuits. ObjectivesThe present study had two aims; a) to determine the extent to which sensory potentials contaminate TEPs using a spatially matched sham condition, and b) to determine whether sensory potentials reflect auditory or somatosensory potentials alone, or a combination of the two. MethodsTwenty healthy participants received active or sham stimulation, with the latter consisting of the click of a sham coil combined with scalp electrical stimulation. Earplugs/headphones were used to suppress the TMS click noise. Two additional control conditions i) electrical stimulation alone and ii) auditory stimulation alone were included in a subset of 13 participants. ResultsSignals from active and sham stimulation were correlated in spatial and temporal domains, especially >70ms post-stimulation. Relative to auditory or electrical stimulation alone, combined (sham) stimulation resulted in a) larger evoked responses b) stronger correlations with active stimulation and c) a signal that could not be explained by the linear sum of electrical and auditory stimulation alone. ConclusionsSensory potentials can confound data interpretations of TEPs at timepoints >70ms post-TMS, while earlier timepoints appear reflective of cortical excitability. Furthermore, contamination of TEPs cannot be explained by auditory or somatosensory potentials alone, but instead reflects a non-linear interaction between both sources. Future studies may benefit from controlling for sensory contamination using sham conditions that are spatially matched to active TMS, and which consist of combined auditory and somatosensory stimulation.

neuroscience↗