Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Chow-Wing-Bom, H. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Chow-Wing-Bom, H. T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

An fMRI-based Approach for Measuring Contrast Sensitivity Across the Visual Field in Visual Cortex

Peripheral vision is crucial for daily activities and quality of life, yet traditional measures of visual function like visual acuity primarily assess central vision. Visual field tests can evaluate peripheral vision but require extended focus combined with precise fixation, often very challenging for patients with severe sight loss. Functional MRI (fMRI) with population receptive field (pRF) mapping offers a non-invasive way to map scotomas but is limited by its reliance on single contrast levels and the necessity of accurate fixation. We developed an fMRI-based approach to measure contrast sensitivity across the visual field without the need for precise fixation. By combining large-field stimulation with varying spatial frequencies and contrast levels with either pRF mapping or a retinotopic atlas based on anatomical landmarks, we modeled contrast sensitivity in the primary visual cortex (V1) over a large (40 deg) expanse of the visual field. In seven normal-sighted participants, we characterized differences in V1 cortical sensitivity across eccentricities and visual quadrants, finding reliable and reproducible patterns of sensitivity differences at individual and session levels. To assess the methods tolerance to fixation variability, we further investigated how different levels of eye movement affect cortical sensitivity patterns in two participants. We found that cortical sensitivity patterns were largely preserved across eye movement, particularly at low spatial frequencies. This suggests that our approach can accommodate several degrees of fixation instability, making it suitable for populations with unstable or biased fixation for whom visual field maps are harder to acquire behaviorally (e.g., patients with dense central scotoma or strabismus). Additionally, our method effectively visualized cases of simulated and disease-linked sensitivity loss at the cortical level. Crucially, we demonstrated that these results could be largely recovered using a structure-based retinotopic atlas, eliminating the need for pRF mapping and precise fixation - although such an approach reduced sensitivity. This approach, integrating large-field stimulation with a retinotopic atlas, offers a promising tool for monitoring vision loss and recovery in patients with various visual impairments, addressing a significant challenge in current clinical assessments.

neuroscience↗

Shared spatial selectivity in early visual cortex and face-selective brain regions

Face recognition relies on dedicated brain regions that are widely considered to show unique selectivity, including a disproportionate vulnerability to face inversion and a relative invariance to stimulus location. This proposed spatial invariance contrasts with accounts of common visuospatial coding whereby high-level category-selective areas inherit spatial properties from earlier regions. Critically, early regions (V1-V3) show characteristic retinotopic variations, with greater cortical sampling along the horizontal than vertical meridian and in the lower than upper field, mirroring established behavioural advantages for face recognition at these locations. We examined whether face-selective regions (OFA, pFus, mFus) share these spatial anisotropies, and whether these properties could drive the observed variations in face recognition. Using wide-field retinotopic mapping with upright and inverted faces ({+/-}21{degrees} eccentricity), we estimated population receptive fields (pRFs) and visual-field coverage. Though pRFs were substantially larger in face-selective regions than in V1-V3, pRF sizes did not vary in line with behavioural anisotropies. In contrast, both early and face-selective regions showed higher pRF numbers and greater visual-field coverage along the horizontal meridian and in the lower field. These sampling differences provide a plausible neural substrate for behavioural anisotropies in face recognition. We also show that pRF numbers in mFus were greater for upright than inverted faces, likely contributing to the perceptual advantage for upright faces. Together, our findings indicate that variations in visual-field sampling within face-selective cortex parallel those of early visual areas, supporting a hierarchical model in which the spatial selectivity of category-selective areas is built on that of earlier regions. Significance statementHigh-level face-selective cortex is often treated as functionally and spatially distinct from early visual areas. We show instead that these regions all share systematic patterns of spatial biases. Using population receptive field (pRF) analyses, both early and face-selective regions showed greater sampling (higher pRF numbers) and increased visual-field coverage along the horizontal than vertical meridian, and in the lower than upper visual field, matching the pattern of anisotropies in face-recognition performance. This relationship was absent for pRF sizes, indicating that behavioural anisotropies are more closely linked to sampling density and coverage. This common pattern of spatial sampling embeds specialised face-processing systems within a hierarchical network in which high-level regions retain fundamental aspects of visuospatial organisation from early visual cortex.

neuroscience↗