Biology subjects

Chio, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Chio, A..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

CREB3 gain of function variants protect against ALS

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal and rapidly evolving neurodegenerative disease that arises from the loss of glutamatergic corticospinal neurons (CSN) and cholinergic motoneurons (MN). The disease is mostly sporadic, but genetics is expected to highly contribute to disease onset and progression. Genome wide association studies identified a few genetic disease modifiers, mostly associated with a negative outcome, and demonstrated that ALS is primarily a disease of excitatory glutamatergic neurons. Here, we reasoned that at least a subpart of genetic disease modifiers may directly modulate the molecular pathways selectively activated in vulnerable neurons as the disease progresses, and concentrated on CSN for their selective vulnerability and glutamatergic identity. We implemented comparative cross-species transcriptomics using snRNAseq data from postmortem motor cortex of ALS patients and controls, and longitudinal RNAseq data from anatomically defined CSN purified from the Sod1G86R mouse model of ALS. We report that disease vulnerable neuronal populations undergo ER stress and altered mRNA translation, and identify the transcription factor CREB3 and its regulatory network as a resilience marker of neuronal dysfunction in ALS. Using genetic and epidemiologic analyses we further identify the rare variant CREB3R119G (rs11538707) as a new disease modifier in ALS. Through gain of function, CREB3R119G decreases both the risk of developing ALS and the progression rate of ALS patients. This study reveals novel genetic variants that protect against ALS and highlights the benefice of combining transcriptomics and genetics to identify new disease modifiers and therapeutic targets.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2022

Molecular dynamics analysis of Superoxide Dismutase 1 mutations suggests decoupling between mechanisms underlying ALS onset and progression

Mutations in the superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) gene are the second most common known cause of ALS. SOD1 variants express high phenotypic variability and over 200 have been reported in people with ALS. Investigating how different SOD1 variants affect the protein dynamics might help in understanding their pathogenic mechanism and explaining their heterogeneous clinical presentation. It was previously proposed that variants can be broadly classified in two groups, wild-type like (WTL) and metal binding region (MBR) variants, based on their structural location and biophysical properties. MBR variants are associated with a loss of SOD1 enzymatic activity. In this study we used molecular dynamics and large clinical datasets to characterise the differences in the structural and dynamic behaviour of WTL and MBR variants with respect to the wild-type SOD1, and how such differences influence the ALS clinical phenotype. Our study identified marked structural differences, some of which are observed in both variant groups, while others are group specific. Moreover, applying graph theory to a network representation of the proteins, we identified differences in the intramolecular contacts of the two classes of variants. Finally, collecting clinical data of approximately 500 SOD1 ALS patients carrying variants from both classes, we showed that the survival time of patients carrying an MBR variant is generally longer (~6 years median difference, p < 0.001) with respect to patients with a WTL variant. In conclusion, our study highlights key differences in the dynamic behaviour of the WTL and MBR SOD1 variants, and wild-type SOD1 at an atomic and molecular level. We identified interesting structural features that could be further investigated to explain the associated phenotypic variability. Our results support the hypothesis of a decoupling between mechanisms of onset and progression of SOD1 ALS, and an involvement of loss-of-function of SOD1 with the disease progression.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

The contribution of Neanderthal introgression and natural selection to neurodegenerative diseases

Humans are thought to be more susceptible to neurodegeneration than equivalently-aged primates. It is not known whether this vulnerability is specific to anatomically-modern humans or shared with other hominids. The contribution of introgressed Neanderthal DNA to neurodegenerative disorders remains uncertain. It is also unclear how common variants associated with neurodegenerative disease risk are maintained by natural selection in the population despite their deleterious effects. In this study, we aimed to quantify the genome-wide contribution of Neanderthal introgression and positive selection to the heritability of complex neurodegenerative disorders to address these questions. We used stratified-linkage disequilibrium score regression to investigate the relationship between five SNP-based signatures of natural selection, reflecting different timepoints of evolution, and genome-wide associated variants of the three most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimers disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinsons disease. We found no evidence for enrichment of positively-selected SNPs in the heritability of Alzheimers disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinsons disease,, suggesting that common deleterious disease variants are unlikely to be maintained by positive selection. There was no enrichment of Neanderthal introgression in the SNP-heritability of these disorders, suggesting that Neanderthal admixture is unlikely to have contributed to disease risk. These findings provide insight into the origins of neurodegenerative disorders within the evolution of Homo sapiens and addresses a long-standing debate, showing that Neanderthal admixture is unlikely to have contributed to common genetic risk of neurodegeneration in anatomically-modern humans.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Genetic analysis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identifies contributing pathways and cell types.

Despite the considerable progress in unraveling the genetic causes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), we do not fully understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease. We analyzed genome-wide data involving 78,500 individuals using a polygenic risk score approach to identify the biological pathways and cell types involved in ALS. This data-driven approach identified multiple aspects of the biology underlying the disease that resolved into broader themes, namely neuron projection morphogenesis, membrane trafficking, and signal transduction mediated by ribonucleotides. We also found that genomic risk in ALS maps consistently to GABAergic cortical interneurons and oligodendrocytes, as confirmed in human single-nucleus RNA-seq data. Using two-sample Mendelian randomization, we nominated five differentially expressed genes (ATG16L2, ACSL5, MAP1LC3A, PLXNB2, and SCFD1) within the significant pathways as relevant to ALS. We conclude that the disparate genetic etiologies of this fatal neurological disease converge on a smaller number of final common pathways and cell types.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Stratification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: a crowdsourcing approach

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease with substantial heterogeneity in clinical presentation with an urgent need for better stratification tools for clinical development and care. In this study we used a crowdsourcing approach to address the problem of ALS patient stratification. The DREAM Prize4Life ALS Stratification Challenge was a crowdsourcing initiative using data from >10,000 patients from completed ALS clinical trials and 1479 patients from community-based patient registers. Challenge participants used machine learning and clustering techniques to predict ALS progression and survival. By developing new approaches, the best performing teams were able to predict disease outcomes better than currently available methods. At the same time, the integration of clustering components across methods led to the emergence of distinct consensus clusters, separating patients into four consistent groups, each with its unique predictors for classification. This analysis reveals for the first time the potential of a crowdsourcing approach to uncover covert patient sub-populations, and to accelerate disease understanding and therapeutic development.

bioinformatics↗