Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cheong, A. M. Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Cheong, A. M. Y..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Visual cortex anodal tDCS does not alter reading performance for Chinese presented character-by-character to normal peripheral vision

Visual cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces crowding in normal peripheral vision and may improve reading of English words in patients with macular degeneration. Given the different visual requirements of reading English words and Chinese characters, the effect of tDCS on peripheral reading performance in English might be different from Chinese. This study recruited seventeen participants (59 to 73 years of age) with normal vision and tested the hypothesis that anodal tDCS would improve reading of Chinese characters presented at 10{degrees} eccentricity compared with sham stimulation. Chinese sentences of different print sizes and exposure durations were presented one character at a time 10{degrees} below or to the left of fixation, and the individual critical print size (CPS) - the smallest print size eliciting the maximum reading speed (MRS) was determined. Reading accuracies for characters presented 0.2 logMAR smaller than the CPS were measured before, during, 5 mins, and 30 mins after receiving active or sham anodal visual cortex tDCS. Participants completed both the active and sham sessions in a random order following a double-blind, within-subject design. No effect of active anodal-tDCS on reading accuracy was observed, implying that a single session of tDCS did not improve Chinese character reading in normal peripheral vision. This may suggest that tDCS does not significantly reduce the crowding elicited within a single Chinese character. However, the effect of tDCS on between-character crowding is yet to be determined.

neuroscience↗

Effect of habitual reading direction on saccadic eye movements

Cognitive processes can influence the characteristics of saccadic eye movements. Reading habits, including habitual reading direction, also affects cognitive and visuospatial processes, favouring attention to the side where reading begins. Few studies have investigated the effect of habitual reading direction on saccade directionality of low-cognitive-demand stimuli (such as dots). The current study examined horizontal prosaccade, antisaccade and self-paced saccade in subjects with two primary habitual reading directions. We hypothesised that saccades responding to the target in subjects habitual reading direction would show a longer prosaccade latency and lower antisaccade error rate (errors being a reflexive glance to a sudden-appearing target, rather than a saccade away from it). Sixteen young Chinese participants with primary habitual reading direction from left to right and sixteen young Arabic and Persian participants with primary habitual reading direction from right to left were recruited. Subjects needed to look towards a 5{degrees}/ 10{degrees}target in the prosaccade task or look towards the mirror image location of the target in the antisaccade task and look between two 10-degree targets in the self-paced saccade task. Only Arabic and Persian participants showed a shorter and directional prosaccade latency towards 5{degrees}target against their habitual reading direction. No significant effect of primary reading direction on antisaccade latency towards the correct directions was found. However, we found that Chinese readers generated significantly shorter prosaccade latencies and higher antisaccade directional errors compared with Arabic and Persian readers. The present study provides an insight into the effect of reading habits on saccadic eye movements in response to low-cognitive-demand stimuli and offers a platform for future studies to investigate the relationship between reading habits and neural mechanisms of eye movement behaviours.

neuroscience↗