Biology subjects

Chan, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Chan, L..

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

Revisiting the Hayflick Limit: Insights from an Integrated Analysis of Changing Transcripts, Proteins, Metabolites and Chromatin

The process wherein dividing cells exhaust proliferative capacity and enter into replicative senescence has become a prominent model for cellular aging in vitro. Despite decades of study, this cellular state is not fully understood in culture and even much less so during aging. Here, we revisit Leonard Hayflicks original observation of replicative senescence in WI-38 human lung fibroblasts equipped with a battery of modern techniques including RNA-seq, single cell RNA-seq, proteomics, metabolomics, and ATAC-seq. We find evidence that the transition to a senescent state manifests early, increases gradually, and corresponds to a concomitant global increase in DNA accessibility in nucleolar and lamin associated domains. Furthermore, we demonstrate that senescent WI-38 cells acquire a striking resemblance to myofibroblasts in a process similar to the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) that is regulated by the transcription factors YAP1/TEAD1 and TGF-{beta}2. Lastly, we show that verteporfin inhibition of YAP1/TEAD1 activity in aged WI-38 cells robustly attenuates this gene expression program.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2020

Mangroves are an overlooked hotspot of insect diversity despite low plant diversity

We here compare the tropical arthropod fauna across a freshwater swamp and six different forest types (rain-, swamp, dry-coastal, urban, freshwater swamp, mangroves) based on 140,000 barcoded specimens belonging to ca. 8,500 species. Surprisingly, we find that mangroves, a globally imperiled habitat that had been expected to be species-poor for insects, are an overlooked hotspot for insect diversity despite having low plant diversity. Our study reveals a species-rich mangrove insect fauna (>3,000 species) that is distinct (>50% of species are mangrove-specific), and has high species turnover across Southeast and East Asia. For most habitats, plant diversity is a good predictor for insect diversity, but mangroves are an exception and compensate for a comparatively low number of phytophagous and fungivorous insect species by supporting an unusually rich community of predators whose larvae feed in the productive mudflats. For the remaining tropical habitats, the insect communities have diversity patterns that are largely congruent across guilds. The discovery of such a sizeable and distinct insect fauna in a globally threatened habitat underlines how little is known about global insect biodiversity.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2019

Artificial Intelligence for Bioinformatics: Applications in Protein Folding Prediction

AI recently shows great promise in the field of bioinformatics, such as protein structure prediction. The Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP) is a nationwide experiment that takes place biannually, which centered around analyzing the best current systems for predicting protein tertiary structures. In this paper, we research on available AI methods and features, and then explore novel methods based on reinforcement learning. Such method will have profound implications for R&D in bioinformatics and add an additional platform to the management of innovation in biotechnology.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

Augmented Intelligence with Natural Language Processing Applied to Electronic Health Records is Useful for Identifying Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease at Risk for Disease Progression

ObjectiveElectronic health record (EHR) systems contain structured data and unstructured documentation. Clinical insights can be derived from analyzing both but optimal methods for this have not been studied extensively. We compared various approaches to analyzing EHR data for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).\n\nMaterials and MethodsWe compared analysis of structured and unstructured EHR data using natural language processing (NLP), free-text search, and diagnostic codes against expert adjudication as the reference standard.\n\nResultsOut of 38,575 patients, we identified 2,281 patients with NAFLD. From the remainder, 10,653 patients with similar data density were selected as a control group. NLP was more sensitive than ICD and text search (NLP 0.93 vs. ICD 0.28 vs. text search 0.81) with higher a F2 score (NLP 0.92 vs. ICD 0.34 vs. text search 0.81). 619 patients had suspected NAFLD documented in radiology notes not acknowledged in other forms of clinical documentation. Of these, 232 (37.5%) were found to have more advanced liver disease after a median of 1,057 days.\n\nDiscussionNLP-based approaches have superior accuracy in identifying NAFLD within the EHR compared to ICD/text search-based approaches. Suspected NAFLD on imaging is often not acknowledged in subsequent clinical documentation. Many such patients are later found to have more advanced liver disease.\n\nConclusionFor identification of NAFLD, NLP performed better than alternative selection modalities and facilitated follow-on analysis of information flow. If accuracy can be proven to persist across clinical domains, NLP can identify patient phenotypes for biomedical research in an accurate and high-throughput manner.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Comparison of Approaches to the identification of Symptom Burden in Hemodialysis Patients Utilizing Electronic Health Records

BackgroundIdentification of symptoms is challenging with surveys, which are time-intensive and low-throughput. Natural language processing (NLP) could be utilized to identify symptoms from narrative documentation in the electronic health record (EHR).\n\nMethodsWe utilized NLP to parse notes for maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients from two EHR databases (BioMe and MIMIC-III) to identify fatigue, nausea/vomiting, anxiety, depression, cramping, itching, and pain. We compared NLP performance with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and validated the performance of both NLP and codes against manual chart review in a representative subset.\n\nResultsWe identified 1034 and 929 HD patients from BioMe and MIMIC-III respectively. The most frequently identified symptoms by NLP from both cohorts were fatigue, pain, and nausea and/or vomiting. NLP was significantly more sensitive than ICD codes for nearly all symptoms. In the BioMe dataset, sensitivity for NLP ranged from 0.85-0.99 vs. 0.09-0.59 for ICD codes. In the MIMIC-III dataset, NLP sensitivity was 0.8-0.98 vs. 0.02-0.53 for ICD. ICD codes were significantly more specific for nausea and/or vomiting (NLP 0.57 vs. ICD 0.97, P=0.03) in BioMe and for depression (NLP 0.67 vs. ICD 0.99, P=0.002) in MIMIC-III. A majority of patients in both cohorts had ?4 symptoms. The more encounters available for a patient the more likely NLP was to identify a symptom.\n\nConclusionsNLP out performed ICD codes for identification of symptoms on several tests parameters including sensitivity for a majority of symptoms. NLP may be useful for the high-throughput identification of patient centered outcomes from EHR.\n\nSignificance StatementPatients on maintenance hemodialysis experience a high frequency of symptoms. However, symptoms have been measured utilizing time-intensive surveys. This paper compares natural language processing (NLP) to administrative codes for the identification of seven key symptoms from two cohorts with electronic health records and validation through manual chart review. NLP identified high rates of symptoms; the most common were fatigue, pain, and nausea and/or vomiting. A majority of patients had [≥]4 symptoms. NLP was significantly more sensitive at identifying symptoms compared to administrative codes for nearly all symptoms but specificity was not significantly different compared to codes. This paper demonstrates utility of a high throughput method of identifying symptoms from EHR which may advance the field of patient centered research in nephrology.

epidemiology↗

bioRxiv2018

Unsupervised Machine learning to subtype Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury

ObjectiveAcute kidney injury (AKI) is highly prevalent in critically ill patients with sepsis. Sepsis-associated AKI is a heterogeneous clinical entity, and, like many complex syndromes, is composed of distinct subtypes. We aimed to agnostically identify AKI subphenotypes using machine learning techniques and routinely collected data in electronic health records (EHRs).\n\nDesignCohort study utilizing the MIMIC-III Database.\n\nSettingICUs from tertiary care hospital in the U.S.\n\nPatientsPatients older than 18 years with sepsis and who developed AKI within 48 hours of ICU admission.\n\nInterventionsUnsupervised machine learning utilizing all available vital signs and laboratory measurements.\n\nMeasurements and Main ResultsWe identified 1,865 patients with sepsis-associated AKI. Ten vital signs and 691 unique laboratory results were identified. After data processing and feature selection, 59 features, of which 28 were measures of intra-patient variability, remained for inclusion into an unsupervised machine-learning algorithm. We utilized k-means clustering with k ranging from 2 - 10; k=2 had the highest silhouette score (0.62). Cluster 1 had 1,358 patients while Cluster 2 had 507 patients. There were no significant differences between clusters on age, race or gender. We found significant differences in comorbidities and small but significant differences in several laboratory variables (hematocrit, bicarbonate, albumin) and vital signs (systolic blood pressure and heart rate). In-hospital mortality was higher in cluster 2 patients, 25% vs. 20%, p=0.008. Features with the largest differences between clusters included variability in basophil and eosinophil counts, alanine aminotransferase levels and creatine kinase values.\n\nConclusionsUtilizing routinely collected laboratory variables and vital signs in the EHR, we were able to identify two distinct subphenotypes of sepsis-associated AKI with different outcomes. Variability in laboratory variables, as opposed to their actual value, was more important for determination of subphenotypes. Our findings show the potential utility of unsupervised machine learning to better subtype AKI.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

A cross-organism framework for supervised enhancer prediction with epigenetic pattern recognition and targeted validation

Enhancers are important noncoding elements, but they have been traditionally hard to characterize experimentally. Only a few mammalian enhancers have been validated, making it difficult to train statistical models for their identification properly. Instead, postulated patterns of genomic features have been used heuristically for identification. The development of massively parallel assays allows for the characterization of large numbers of enhancers for the first time. Here, we developed a framework that uses Drosophila STARR-seq data to create shape-matching filters based on enhancer-associated meta-profiles of epigenetic features. We combined these features with supervised machine learning algorithms (e.g., support vector machines) to predict enhancers. We demonstrated that our model could be applied to predict enhancers in mammalian species (i.e., mouse and human). We comprehensively validated the predictions using a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches, involving transgenic assays in mouse and transduction-based reporter assays in human cell lines. Overall, the validations involved 153 enhancers in 6 mouse tissues and 4 human cell lines. The results confirmed that our model can accurately predict enhancers in different species without re-parameterization. Finally, we examined the transcription-factor binding patterns at predicted enhancers and promoters in human cell lines. We demonstrated that these patterns enable the construction of a secondary model effectively discriminating between enhancers and promoters.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Is it actionable? An Evaluation of the Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel on the Management of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Blood Stream Infection

BackgroundThere is growing interest in the use of rapid blood culture identification (BCID) panels in antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). While many studies have looked at its clinical and economic utility, its comparative utility in gram-positive and gram-negative blood stream infections (BSI) have not been as well characterized.\n\nMethodsThe study was a quasi-experimental retrospective study at the Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona. All adult patients with positive blood cultures before BCID implementation (June 2015 to December 2015) and after BCID implementation (June 2016 to December 2016) were included. The outcomes of interest included: time to first appropriate antibiotic escalation, time to first appropriate antibiotic de-escalation, time to organism identification, LOS, infectious disease consultation, discharge disposition, and in-hospital mortality.\n\nResultsIn total, 203 patients were included in this study. There was a significant difference in the time to organism identification between pre- and post-BCID cohorts (27.1h vs. 3.3h, p<0.0001). BCID did not significantly reduce the time to first appropriate antimicrobial escalation or de-escalation for either GP-BSIs or GN-BSIs. Providers were more likely to escalate antimicrobial therapy in GP-BSIs after gram stain and more likely to de-escalate therapy in GN-BSIs after susceptibilities. While there were no significant differences in changes in antimicrobial therapy after organism identification by BCID, over a quarter of providers (28.1%) made changes after organism identification.\n\nConclusionsWhile BCID significantly reduced the time to identification for both GP-BSIs and GN-BSIs, BCID did not reduce the time to first appropriate antimicrobial escalation and de-escalation.

microbiology↗