Chabikwa, T. G. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2021

The seasonal dynamics of bud dormancy in grapevine suggest a regulated checkpoint prior to acclimation

Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) displays wide plasticity to climate and seasonality, ranging from strongly deciduous to evergreen. Understanding the physiology of decisions to grow or quiesce is critical for improved crop management, prediction, and the adaptability of production to alternative climate scenarios. The perenniating bud (N+2) is a major economic unit and focus of study. Here we investigated the physiology and transcriptome of cv. Merlot buds grown in a temperate maritime climate from summer to spring in two consecutive years. The changes in bud respiration, hydration and internal tissue oxygen data were consistent with the transcriptome data. ABA-responsive gene processes prevailed upon the transition to a deep metabolic and cellular quiescence in the bud during autumn. Light, together with hypoxia and redox signalling presided over the resumption of nuclear and cellular growth in the transition to spring. Comparisons with transcriptome data from bud burst studies revealed a number of regulatory candidates for the orderly resumption of growth in spring, including components that may integrate light and temperature signalling. Importantly however, the bud burst forcing data, which is widely used as a measure of bud dormancy, were not consistent with the physiological and transcription data. We hypothesise the existence of a physiological checkpoint following bud set in summer, which if not met results in extreme quiescence. Collectively this is the most integrated developmental dataset of the latent bud of cultivated grapevine, and establishes a platform for systems approaches to study seasonal plasticity. One sentence summaryPhysiology and transcriptome data provide strong evidence of a regulatory checkpoint prior to acclimation and dormancy in latent grapevine buds.

plant biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Sucrose represses the expression of the strigolactone signalling gene D3/RMS4/MAX2 to promote tillering

- Shoot branching, a major component of shoot architecture, is regulated by multiple signals. Previous studies have indicated that sucrose may promote branching through suppressing the inhibitory effect of the hormone strigolactone (SL). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this effect are unknown. - Here we used molecular and genetic tools to identify the molecular targets underlying the antagonistic interaction between sucrose and SL. - We showed that sucrose antagonises the suppressive action of SL on tillering in rice and on the degradation of D53, a major target of SL signalling. Sucrose inhibits the expression of D3, the orthologue of the arabidopsis F-box protein MAX2 required for SL signalling. Over-expression of D3 prevents sucrose from inhibiting D53 degradation and enabled the SL inhibition of tillering under high sucrose. Sucrose also prevents SL-induced degradation of D14, the SL receptor involved in D53 degradation. Interestingly, D14 over-expression enhances D53 protein levels and sucrose-induced tillering. - Our results show that sucrose inhibits SL perception by targeting key components of SL signalling and, together with previous studies reporting the inhibition of SL synthesis by nitrate and phosphate, demonstrate the central role played by strigolactones in the regulation of plant architecture by nutrients.

plant biology↗