Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cavanaugh, M. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Cavanaugh, M. R..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Steering in the presence of a gaze-contingent occlusion over a quarter of the visual field

Why do some cortically blind (CB) drivers who are missing vision from a quadrant or hemifield have trouble maintaining a central lane position, while others do not? A recent driving study in virtual reality showed that most patients with right-sided visual field deficits (right CB) perform similarly to controls, while most of those with left CB demonstrated a unique pattern of steering biases (Giguere et al., 2025). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that these biases could result from loss of visual information falling on the blind field. The steering and gaze behavior of 24 subjects with normal vision (mean age: 19.8 years, SD: 1.44) were recorded in a virtual reality steering task while gaze-contingent occluding masks were imposed on a quadrant of their visual field. The central five degrees of vision were spared to mimic the sparing present in most CB patients. Turn direction (left/right), turn radius (two non-constant radii), and occlusion quadrant (one of four quadrants or no occlusion) were randomized between trials. We found that the pattern of steering biases observed in CB drivers were not replicated when visually-healthy drivers were subjected to gaze-contingent masks, and we conclude that it may be a mistake to characterize the effects of cortical blindness on steering behavior as consistent with a simple omission of visual information. This insight has the potential to guide future research on CB adaptation to their visual impairments and possible interventions to improve their steering performance.

animal behavior and cognition↗

The effect of unilateral cortical blindness on lane position and gaze behavior in a virtual reality steering task

Adults with cortically-induced blindness (CB) affecting a quarter to a half of their visual field show greater variability in lane positioning when driving compared to those with intact vision. Because humans rely on visual information from optic flow to control steering, we hypothesized that these lane biases are caused in part by a disruption to motion processing caused by CB. To investigate, we examined the steering behavior of 21 CB drivers (11 left-sided, 10 right-sided visual deficits) and 9 visually intact controls in a naturalistic virtual environment. Participants were instructed to maintain a central lane position while traveling at 19 m/s along a procedurally generated single-lane road. Turn direction (left/right) and turn radius (35m/55m/75m) varied between trials, and the quality of optic flow information was indirectly manipulated by altering the environmental texture density (low/medium/high). Right-sided CB participants maintained a similar average distance from the inner road edge as controls. Those with left-sided CB were less affected by changes in optic flow and turn direction. These differences were not explained by age, time since stroke, sparing of central vision, gaze direction, or saccade rate. Our results suggest that some left-sided CB participants place a lower weighting on optic flow information in the control of steering, possibly as a result of lateralization in the processing of motion. More broadly, our findings show that CB steering and gaze behavior are remarkably preserved despite the presence of visual deficits across large portions of the visual field.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Changes in perilesional V1 underlie training-induced recovery in cortically-blind patients

Damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) causes profound, homonymous visual-field loss termed cortical blindness (CB). Though long considered intractable, multiple studies now show that perceptual training can recover visual functions in chronic CB. A popular hypothesis is that training recruits intact extrageniculostriate pathways. Alternatively, training may induce plastic changes within spared regions of the damaged V1. Here, we linked changes in luminance detection sensitivity with retinotopic fMRI activity in eleven chronic CB patients, before and after extensive visual discrimination training. Our results show that the strength of spared V1 activity representing perimetrically blind-field locations before training predicts the amount of training-induced recovery of luminance detection sensitivity. Additionally, training caused an enlargement of population receptive fields in perilesional V1 cortex, which increased blind-field coverage. These findings uncover fundamental changes in perilesional V1 cortex underlying training-induced restoration of conscious luminance detection sensitivity in cortically-blind patients.

neuroscience↗