Cashaback, J. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2018

Somatosensory Perceptual Training Enhances Motor Learning by Observing

Neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies in humans have demonstrated that action observation activates brain regions involved in sensory-motor control. A growing body of work has shown that action observation can also facilitate motor learning; observing a tutor undergoing motor learning results in functional plasticity within the motor system and gains in subsequent motor performance. However, the effects of observing motor learning extend beyond the motor domain. Converging evidence suggests that learning also results in somatosensory functional plasticity and somatosensory perceptual changes. This work has raised the possibility that the somatosensory system is also involved in motor learning that results from observation. Here we tested this hypothesis using a somatosensory perceptual training paradigm. If the somatosensory system is indeed involved in motor learning by observing, then improving subjects' somatosensory function before observation should enhance subsequent observation-related gains in motor performance. Subjects performed a proprioceptive discrimination task in which a robotic manipulandum moved the subjects passive upper limb and he or she made judgments about the position of the hand. Subjects in a Trained Learning group received trial-by-trial feedback to improve their proprioceptive acuity. Subjects in an Untrained Learning group performed the same task without feedback. All subjects then observed a learning video showing a tutor adapting her reaches to a left force field (FF). We found that subjects in the Trained Learning group, who had superior proprioceptive acuity prior to observation, benefited more from observing learning compared to subjects in the Untrained Learning group. Improving somatosensory function can therefore enhance subsequent observation-related gains in motor learning. This study provides further evidence in favor of the involvement of the somatosensory system in motor learning by observing.\n\nAbbreviationsThe authors report no financial interests or conflicts of interests.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Distinct Neural Signatures of Reward and Sensory Prediction Error in Motor Learning

At least two distinct processes have been identified by which motor commands are adapted according to movement-related feedback: reward based learning and sensory error based learning. In sensory error based learning, mappings between sensory targets and motor commands are recalibrated according to sensory error feedback. In reward based learning, motor commands are associated with subjective value, such that successful actions are reinforced. We designed two tasks to isolate reward and sensory error based motor adaptation, and recorded electroencephalography (EEG) from humans to identify and dissociate the neural correlates of reward and sensory error processing. We designed a visuomotor rotation task to isolate sensory error based learning which was induced by altered visual feedback of hand position. In a reward learning task, we isolated reward based learning induced by binary reward feedback that was decoupled from the visual target. We found that a fronto-central event related potential called the feedback related negativity (FRN) was elicited specifically by reward feedback but not sensory error feedback. A more posterior component called the P300 was evoked by feedback in both tasks. In the visuomotor rotation task, P300 amplitude was increased by sensory error induced by perturbed visual feedback, and was correlated with learning rate. In the reward learning task, P300 amplitude was increased by reward relative to non reward and by surprise regardless of feedback valence. We propose that during motor adaptation, the FRN might specifically mark reward prediction error while the P300 might reflect processing which is modulated more generally by prediction error.\n\nNew and NoteworthyWe studied the event related potentials evoked by feedback stimuli during motor adaptation tasks that isolate reward and sensory error learning mechanisms. We found that the feedback related negativity was specifically elicited by reward feedback, while the P300 was observed in both tasks. These results reveal neural processes associated with different learning mechanisms and elucidate which classes of errors, from a computational standpoint, elicit the FRN and P300.

neuroscience↗