Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cascini, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Cascini, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Rates of molecular and morphological evolution are uncoupled across the eukaryote Tree of Life

A vast degree of phenotypic variation can be seen across lineages of eukaryotes. Although at least part of this diversity has a genomic basis, it is unclear whether there are broad-scale links that can be detected between rates of genomic and phenotypic evolution. The presence of a correlation would imply the action of shared drivers, such as mutational or adaptive processes that occur on a genome- and organism-wide scale. We investigated this question by using a phylogenetic approach to test for correlations between molecular and morphological evolutionary rates. We analysed 60 data sets of combined nucleotide sequences and discrete morphological characters, representing a diverse range of eukaryotes that include alveolates, plants, invertebrates, fishes, and tetrapods. Using a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic approach based on sister-pair contrasts, we found very little evidence of any link between rates of molecular and morphological evolution, a striking result given the scale and taxonomic breadth of our analyses. Our results point to contrasting evolutionary dynamics underlying genomes and phenotypic traits, most likely involving differing extents of selection. These processes have also led to greater variation in morphological evolutionary rates across lineages, whereas molecular evolution is more clocklike. Our results have implications for how evolutionary change should be modelled in phylogenetic analyses of combined data sets. Overall, our study reveals the discrepancies in evolutionary drivers that act at the genomic and phenotypic levels across the eukaryotic Tree of Life.

evolutionary biology↗

Evolutionary rates in "living fossils" across the Tree of Life

Lineages that have undergone little apparent evolutionary change over long geological intervals are often described as "living fossils", with iconic examples including the coelacanth, tuatara, and Ginkgo. However, studies of morphological and molecular data have produced mixed evidence regarding whether living fossils have evolved more slowly than their relatives. We tested for reduced evolutionary rates using a sister-pairs approach, analysing a comprehensive set of morphological and molecular data for 45 living-fossil lineages and their close relatives across the Tree of Life. Living-fossil lineages showed substantially reduced rates of morphological evolution, whereas evidence for reduced molecular rates was weaker. To test whether this pattern could be explained by species poverty, we also analysed other depauperate lineages (species-poor clades contrasted with species-rich sister clades) and found a weak tendency towards reduced molecular rates but without a corresponding slowdown in morphological evolution. Our study reveals that the living-fossil concept captures a quantifiable pattern of prolonged morphological conservatism, but also suggests that living fossils lack other shared biological or life-history characteristics that might unite them as a group.

evolutionary biology↗

From mountaintops to metacollections: using genomics to evaluate ex situ conservation collections. A case study from tropical montane cloud forest plants

A core aim of ex situ conservation is to represent wild genetic diversity in managed living collections. For the climate-threatened tropical montane cloud forest (TMCF) flora of northeast Australia, an ex situ metacollection of plants and seeds has been established by the Tropical Mountain Plant Science (TroMPS) project. In this study we used reduced-representation sequencing (DArTseq) of wild, herbarium, and ex situ material alongside provenance information for ten species, to pursue two central aims: to characterise landscape-scale genetic structure across species ranges, and to evaluate how well the assembled metacollections represent that wild diversity. Analyses revealed consistent patterns of genetic differentiation among mountain top populations across multiple species, reflecting the isolating influence of lowland gaps between upland habitats, with the degree of differentiation varying among species. These results provide the first genetic baseline for Australian TMCF flora and reinforce the importance of treating individual mountain top populations as distinct units for conservation management. Additionally, the project provided valuable insights into the logistical challenges of coordinated multi-institutional collecting, informing strategies for metacollection design more broadly. Evaluation of the metacollection revealed both strengths and gaps in representation across species, providing an evidence base to refine the current holdings and guide future targeted collecting to strengthen their long-term conservation value.

genomics↗