Carleton, H. A. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

Standalone nanopore sequencing for foodborne pathogen surveillance: a large-scale evaluation and quality control framework

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is central to foodborne pathogen surveillance and cross-border outbreak detection. Long-read sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) promises rapid, complete, and cost-effective genome assemblies in a single workflow. However, the adoption of standalone ONT sequencing of native DNA has been slowed by concerns that DNA modifications can compromise per-base sequencing accuracy and downstream genotyping. In this study, we evaluated ONT-only sequencing performance across 294 genetically diverse isolates representing ten major foodborne pathogens. Using the SUP@v5.2 basecalling model at 50x coverage, 97.3% (286/294) of the ONT assemblies produced identical or near-identical cgMLST profiles ([≤]3 allelic differences) as Illumina-polished hybrid assemblies. Elevated error rates were observed in four Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky and four Listeria monocytogenes isolates and were associated with the presence of specific DNA phosphorothioation or methylation systems. Re-basecalling the same dataset with the newly released HAC@v6.0 model revealed a different error profile: although 93.5% (275/294) of assemblies remained highly accurate, all 13 isolates carrying dnd (DNA phosphorothioation) or dpd (7-deazaguanine modification) systems, including isolates of S. enterica, Cronobacter sakazakii, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, exhibited high error rates, suggesting that such atypical modifications were not adequately represented in the models training dataset. To enable rapid identification of unreliable assemblies, we developed alpaqa, a lightweight computational tool that detects systematic nanopore assembly errors without requiring supplemental short-read data or reference genomes. By identifying affected assemblies, alpaqa provides a quality safeguard for ONT-only workflows. Masking low-quality bases in assemblies flagged by alpaqa improved cgMLST accuracy, although this reduced the number of callable loci and therefore genotyping resolution. Our findings demonstrate that standalone ONT sequencing of native DNA is sufficiently accurate for routine foodborne pathogen surveillance when combined with appropriate quality control, supporting its use in harmonised genomic surveillance frameworks. Data summaryAll sequencing data generated in this study have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive. Accession numbers for Illumina and ONT (SUP@v5.2) reads are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Raw pod5 files from error-prone isolates have been deposited in SquiDBase (SQB000021). Alpaqa is available at github.com/MBiggel/alpaqa/. An automated ONT assembly and quality control pipeline integrating alpaqa is available at github.com/MBiggel/boap/. Impact statementThis study demonstrates that standalone Oxford Nanopore sequencing of native DNA can achieve highly accurate genotyping for routine foodborne pathogen surveillance across diverse species. We show that the remaining inaccuracies are linked to specific DNA modification systems, including phosphorothioation and 7-deazaguanine modifications, which are identified here as previously unrecognised sources of systematic sequencing errors. To address this limitation, we introduce alpaqa, a reference-free method for detecting such error-prone assemblies, providing a practical quality-control framework for ONT-only workflows. Together, these results support the reliable use of nanopore sequencing in routine genomic surveillance.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2017

Comparison Of Multi-locus Sequence Typing Software For Next Generation Sequencing Data

Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) is a widely used method for categorising bacteria. Increasingly MLST is being performed using next generation sequencing data by reference labs and for clinical diagnostics. Many software applications have been developed to calculate sequence types from NGS data; however, there has been no comprehensive review to date on these methods. We have compared six of these applications against real and simulated data and present results on: 1. the accuracy of each method against traditional typing methods, 2. the performance on real outbreak datasets, 3. in the impact of contamination and varying depth of coverage, and 4. the computational resource requirements.\n\nDATA SUMMARYO_LISimulated reads for datasets testing coverage and mixed samples have been deposited in Figshare; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4602301.vl\nC_LIO_LIOutbreak databases are available from Github; url - https://github.com/WGS-standards-and-analysis/datasets\nC_LIO_LIDocker containers used to run each of the applications are available from Github; url - https://tinyurl.com/z7ks2ft\nC_LIO_LIAccession numbers for the data used in this paper are available in the Supplementary material.\nC_LI\n\nWe confirm all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files. {ballotx}\n\nIMPACT STATEMENTSequence typing is rapidly transitioning from traditional sequencing methods to using whole genome sequencing. A number of in silico prediction methods have been developed on an ad hoc basis and aim to replicate Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST). This is the first study to comprehensively evaluate multiple MLST software applications on real validated datasets and on common simulated difficult cases. It will give researchers a clearer understanding of the accuracy, limitations and computational performance of the methods they use, and will assist future researchers to choose the most appropriate method for their experimental goals.

bioinformatics↗