Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Camarillo, D. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Camarillo, D. B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Precise MRI-Histology Coregistration of Paraffin-Embedded Tissue with Blockface Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides 3D spatial information on tissue, yet it lacks at the molecular level. In contrast, histology provides cellular and molecular information, but it lacks the 3D spatial context and direct in vivo translation. Coregistering the two is key for the 3D-embedding of histological details, validating pathological MRI findings, and finding quantitative imaging biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases. However, coregistration is challenging due to non-linear distortions of the tissue from histological processing and sectioning leading to microscopic and macroscopic nonlinear 3D deformations between specimen MRI and stained histology sections. To address this, we developed a novel pipeline, named Brewsters Blockface Quantification (BBQ), integrating robust optical approaches with innovative 2D and 3D registration algorithms to achieve precise volumetric alignment of specimen MRI data with histological images. On a variety of brain tissue specimens from distinct anatomical regions and across multiple species, our methodology generated blockface volumes with minimal distortion and artifacts. Using these blockface volumes as an intermediary, we achieve a precise alignment between MRI and histology slides, yielding registration results with an overlapping Dice score of [~]90% for whole tissue alignment between MRI and blockface volumes, and >95% for 2D MRI-histology registration. This correlative MRI-histology pipeline with robust 2D and 3D coregistration methods promises to enhance our understanding of neurodegenerative diseases and aid the development of MRI-based disease biomarkers.

bioengineering↗

Video Assessment of Head Impact Exposure in American Football

Previous research has sought to quantify head impact exposure using wearable kinematic sensors. However, many sensors suffer from poor accuracy in estimating impact kinematics and count, motivating the need for additional independent impact exposure quantification for comparison. Here, we equipped seven collegiate American football players with instrumented mouthguards, and video recorded practices and games to compare video-based and sensor-based exposure rates and impact location distributions. Over 50 player-hours, we identified 271 helmet contact periods in video, while the instrumented mouthguard sensor recorded 2,032 discrete head impacts. Matching video and mouthguard real-time stamps yielded 193 video-identified helmet contact periods and 217 sensor-recorded impacts. To compare impact locations, we binned matched impacts into frontal, rear, side, oblique, and top locations based on video observations and sensor kinematics. While both video-based and sensor-based methods found similar location distributions, our best method utilizing integrated linear and angular position only correctly predicted 81 of 217 impacts. Finally, based on the activity timeline from video assessment, we also developed a new exposure metric unique to American football quantifying number of cross-verified sensor impacts per player-play. We found significantly higher exposure during games (0.35, 95% CI: 0.29-0.42) than practices (0.20, 95% CI: 0.17-0.23) (p<0.05). In the traditional impacts per player-hour metric, we observed higher exposure during practices (4.7) than games (3.7) due to increased player activity in practices. Thus, our exposure metric accounts for variability in on-field participation. While both video-based and sensor-based exposure datasets have limitations, they can complement one another to provide more confidence in exposure statistics.

bioengineering↗