Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cahill, L. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Cahill, L. S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The Male Default Prevails in Biomedical Research: Sex Inclusion in Nature (2025)

Despite longstanding recognition of sex as a biological variable, its integration into biomedical research remains inconsistent. Numerous publishers have introduced policies to improve reporting and inclusion of sex and gender, including Nature, which requires authors to complete a Life Science Reporting Summary documenting sex inclusion. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness of these policies by examining sex inclusion and reporting practices in all original research articles involving humans, vertebrates, or cell lines published in Nature in 2025 (N=513). Nearly two-thirds of articles included both sexes (62.7%); however, inclusion was often nominal. Of these articles reporting inclusion of both sexes, 33% did not maintain inclusion across experiments, used markedly unbalanced sex ratios ([≥]2:1), or alternated between male- and female-only experiments. Another 45.5% of these articles reporting inclusion of both sexes did not report sample size by sex, so it cannot be ascertained whether sex inclusion was maintained across experiments or balanced by sex. Single-sex studies accounted for approximately one-fifth of articles. While male-only and female-only studies occurred at similar overall rates, male-only studies were more than four times more likely to address conditions affecting both sexes while female-only studies were more likely to address sex-specific conditions (e.g., ovarian cancer). Only 7% of articles explicitly analyzed sex as a discovery variable for at least some analyses. These findings suggest that transparency-focused reporting summaries alone are insufficient to ensure sex inclusion and/or meaningful analytical integration of sex. As a leading biomedical journal, Nature plays a central role in shaping research norms; without stronger editorial expectations, reporting requirements risk reinforcing male-default assumptions rather than advancing rigor and generalizability.

scientific communication and education↗

Acute and chronic stage adaptations of vascular architecture and cerebral blood flow in a mouse model of TBI

The 3D organization of cerebral blood vessels determines the overall capacity of the cerebral circulation to meet the metabolic requirements of the brain. This study used Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI with a hypercapnic challenge and ex vivo Serial Two-Photon Tomography (STPT) to examine the relationship between blood flow and 3D microvascular structure following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a mouse. Mice were exposed to a controlled cortical impact TBI and allowed to recover for either 1 day or 4 weeks. At each time point, ASL MRI was performed to quantify cerebral perfusion and the brain vasculature was imaged in 3D with STPT. Registration of ASL to STPT enabled flow changes to be related to the underlying microvascular structure in each ASL voxel. Hypoperfusion under rest and hypercapnia was observed both 1 day and 4 weeks post-TBI. Vessel density and vascular volume were reduced 1 day post-TBI, recovering by 4 weeks; however, the reorganized vasculature at the latter time point possessed an abnormal radial pattern. Our findings demonstrate functionally significant long-term changes in the vascular architecture following injury and illustrate why metrics beyond traditional measures of vessel density are required to understand the impact of vascular structure on function.

neuroscience↗

Structural covariance of brain region volumes is associated with both structural connectivity and transcriptomic similarity

An organizational pattern seen in the brain, termed structural covariance, is the statistical association of pairs of brain regions in their anatomical properties. These associations, measured across a population as covariances or correlations usually in cortical thickness or volume, are thought to reflect genetic and environmental underpinnings.\n\nHere, we examine the biological basis of structural volume covariance in the mouse brain. We first examined large scale associations between brain region volumes using an atlas-based approach that parcellated the entire mouse brain into 318 regions over which correlations in volume were assessed, for volumes obtained from 153 mouse brain images via high-resolution MRI. We then used a seed-based approach and determined, for 108 different seed regions across the brain and using mouse gene expression and connectivity data from the Allen Institute for Brain Science, the variation in structural covariance data that could be explained by distance to seed, transcriptomic similarity to seed, and connectivity to seed.\n\nWe found that overall, correlations in structure volumes hierarchically clustered into distinct anatomical systems, similar to findings from other studies and similar to other types of networks in the brain, including structural connectivity and transcriptomic similarity networks. Across seeds, this structural covariance was significantly explained by distance (17% of the variation, up to a maximum of 49% for structural covariance to the visceral area of the cortex), transcriptomic similarity (13% of the variation, up to maximum of 28% for structural covariance to the primary visual area) and connectivity (15% of the variation, up to a maximum of 36% for structural covariance to the intermediate reticular nucleus in the medulla) of covarying structures. Together, distance, connectivity, and transcriptomic similarity explained 37% of structural covariance, up to a maximum of 63% for structural covariance to the visceral area. Additionally, this pattern of explained variation differed spatially across the brain, with transcriptomic similarity playing a larger role in the cortex than subcortex, while connectivity explains structural covariance best in parts of the cortex, midbrain, and hindbrain. These results suggest that both gene expression and connectivity underlie structural volume covariance, albeit to different extents depending on brain region, and this relationship is modulated by distance.

neuroscience↗