Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Buston, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Buston, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Increasing absolute prey community density protects aposematic models and their imperfect Batesian mimics: Evidence from Neotropical Adelpha butterflies

Batesian mimicry is a defensive adaptation where predators learn to avoid aposematic prey and generalize their warning signals to phenotypically similar mimics. The phenotypic accuracy needed for mimics to benefit from this adaptation depends on the relative densities of models and mimics and the models unpalatability. As aposematic models become more unpalatable or more common relative to their mimics, warning signals become stronger, allowing even poor mimics to benefit. However, few studies have disentangled the importance of relative frequencies of models and mimics from absolute density of the prey community (both models and mimics) in driving relaxed selection on imperfect mimics. Here, we test the hypothesis that increasing model unpalatability and absolute prey community density accelerates predator avoidance learning and enhances protection for imperfect mimics. Using replicas of the model Adelpha iphiclus (Linnaeus), its imperfect mimic Adelpha serpa (Boisduval), and the palatable control Junonia evarete (Cramer), we conducted field experiments that enhanced model unpalatability and doubled absolute prey density while maintaining a constant ratio of model, mimic, and control phenotypes. We found that enhanced model unpalatability and increased absolute density significantly reduced predation on all species, highlighting absolute community density as an underappreciated mechanism shaping selection on imperfect Batesian mimics.

ecology↗

Plasticity Associated with Adoption of Social Roles in Clown Anemonefish

Central questions of animal behavior are how do individual phenotypes shape and how are individual phenotypes shaped by dominance hierarchies. Using clownfish (Amphiprion percula) as a model system, we investigated how individuals strategically modify their phenotype during hierarchy formation. We tested the overarching hypothesis that interactions among size- and age-matched rivals will lead to the emergence of social roles (dominant, subordinate, solitary), accompanied by divergence in four aspects of individual phenotypes: growth, feeding behavior, agonistic behaviors (aggression, submission), and gene expression. To test this, we created 30 replicates of juvenile clownfish, each comprising a size-matched pair housed together, and a solitary size-matched individual housed separately. Our results show that an individuals social context shapes its growth trajectory through coordinated changes in feeding behavior, agonistic behaviors, and gene expression. Individuals emerging as dominant within pairs grew twice as much compared to those emerging as subordinates, while subordinate and solitary individuals showed comparable growth. Initially, paired individuals consumed more food per capita than solitary individuals, but this difference declined as size hierarchies became established. Agonistic behaviors also decreased over time among paired individuals as size differences emerged. Transcriptomic analyses revealed upregulation of conserved vertebrate growth pathways and ossification related genes, and downregulation of satiety-associated genes, in dominant individuals compared to subordinates and solitaries. Here we identify associations between changes in gene expression, growth, and feeding behavior regulation that reinforce social role differentiation during dominance hierarchy formation in clownfish. Our findings lay the foundation for a broader framework to explore the mechanisms underpinning strategic growth in social vertebrates.

ecology↗