Biology subjects

Bussola, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Bussola, N..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

DNT: Diploid Genomic Foundation Model

Clinical interpretation of genetic variation depends on the diploid genotype, including zygosity, allele dosage and whether multiple variants occur in cis on the same homologue or in trans on different homologues. Most genomic language models process haploid sequences or combine independently encoded haplotypes downstream, so they do not directly represent the paired genotype in a single sequence. We introduce a reference-aligned diploid encoding for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions and deletions (indels), together with unphased and phase-retaining tokenizers that accept phased genotypes and convert them to single-sequence diploid representation. Using Nucleotide Transformer v3 backbones, we continue training 8-million- and 100-million-parameter models and evaluate an auxiliary Contrastive Phase Loss (CPL) designed to retain the phasing information of the variants in contextual representations. We evaluate on a novel compound-heterozygous benchmark containing 9,460 examples. Models whose inputs did not distinguish relative phase remained near chance, whereas our diploidic models improved discrimination with AUROC 0.649, compared to 0.506 for the vocabulary-adapted control. These findings establish a method for making diploid genotype information accessible to genomic language models, rather than a universal improvement in variant prediction; validation in naturally observed, accurately phased clinical cohorts remains necessary.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2026

GFMBench-API: A Standardized Interface for Benchmarking Genomic Foundation Models

The rapid scaling of Genomic Foundation Models (GFMs) has created a critical need for standardized evaluation frameworks. Current benchmarking practices are often fragmented, relying on model-specific preprocessing and inconsistent metric implementations that hinder reproducible comparisons. We present GFMBench-API, a high-level Python interface designed to unify the evaluation lifecycle of GFMs. GFMBench-API provides a modular "middleware" architecture that decouples model-specific tokenization and embedding logic from task-specific data streams and performance metrics. By standardizing the input/output schemas for common genomic tasks, such as regulatory element prediction, variant effect scoring, and long-range interaction mapping, GFMBench-API enables researchers to integrate new models or tasks with minimal "glue code." Our interface ensures mathematical consistency across evaluations, providing a robust foundation for the transparent and systematic benchmarking of GFMs.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2020

Integrative Network Fusion: a multi-omics approach in molecular profiling

Recent technological advances and international efforts, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), have made available several pan-cancer datasets encompassing multiple omics layers with detailed clinical information in large collection of samples. The need has thus arisen for the development of computational methods aimed at improving cancer subtyping and biomarker identification from multi-modal data. Here we apply the Integrative Network Fusion (INF) pipeline, which combines multiple omics layers exploiting Similarity Network Fusion (SNF) within a machine learning predictive framework. INF includes a feature ranking scheme (rSNF) on SNF-integrated features, used by a classifier over juxtaposed multi-omics features (juXT). In particular, we show instances of INF implementing Random Forest (RF) and linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM) as the classifier, and two baseline RF and LSVM models are also trained on juXT. A compact RF model, called rSNFi, trained on the intersection of top-ranked biomarkers from the two approaches juXT and rSNF is finally derived. All the classifiers are run in a 10x5-fold cross-validation schema to warrant reproducibility, following the guidelines for an unbiased Data Analysis Plan by the US FDA-led initiatives MAQC/SEQC. INF is demonstrated on four classification tasks on three multi-modal TCGA oncogenomics datasets. Gene expression, protein abundances and copy number variants are used to predict estrogen receptor status (BRCA-ER, N=381) and breast invasive carcinoma subtypes (BRCA-subtypes, N=305), while gene expression, miRNA expression and methylation data is used as predictor layers for acute myeloid leukemia and renal clear cell carcinoma survival (AML-OS, N=157; KIRC-OS, N=181). In test, INF achieved similar Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) values and 97% to 83% smaller feature sizes (FS), compared with juXT for BRCA-ER (MCC: 0.83 vs 0.80; FS: 56 vs 1801) and BRCA-subtypes (0.84 vs 0.80; 302 vs 1801), improving KIRC-OS performance (0.38 vs 0.31; 111 vs 2319). INF predictions are generally more accurate in test than one-dimensional omics models, with smaller signatures too, where transcriptomics consistently play the leading role. Overall, the INF framework effectively integrates multiple data levels in oncogenomics classification tasks, improving over the performance of single layers alone and naive juxtaposition, and provides compact signature sizes1.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

Integrating deep and radiomics features in cancer bioimaging

Almost every clinical specialty will use artificial intelligence in the future. The first area of practical impact is expected to be the rapid and accurate interpretation of image streams such as radiology scans, histo-pathology slides, ophthalmic imaging, and any other bioimaging diagnostic systems, enriched by clinical phenotypes used as outcome labels or additional descriptors. In this study, we introduce a machine learning framework for automatic image interpretation that combines the current pattern recognition approach (\"radiomics\") with Deep Learning (DL). As a first application in cancer bioimaging, we apply the framework for prognosis of locoregional recurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (N=298) from Computed Tomography (CT) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging. The DL architecture is composed of two parallel cascades of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) layers merging in a softmax classification layer. The network is first pretrained on head and neck tumor stage diagnosis, then finetuned on the prognostic task by internal transfer learning. In parallel, radiomics features (e.g., shape of the tumor mass, texture and pixels intensity statistics) are derived by predefined feature extractors on the CT/PET pairs. We compare and mix deep learning and radiomics features into a unifying classification pipeline (RADLER), where model selection and evaluation are based on a data analysis plan developed in the MAQC initiative for reproducible biomarkers. On the multimodal CT/PET cancer dataset, the mixed deep learning/radiomics approach is more accurate than using only one feature type, or image mode. Further, RADLER significantly improves over published results on the same data.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Evaluating reproducibility of AI algorithms in digital pathology with DAPPER

Artificial Intelligence is exponentially increasing its impact on healthcare. As deep learning is mastering computer vision tasks, its application to digital pathology is natural, with the promise of aiding in routine reporting and standardizing results across trials. Deep learning features inferred from digital pathology scans can improve validity and robustness of current clinico-pathological features, up to identifying novel histological patterns, e.g. from tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. In this study, we examine the issue of evaluating accuracy of predictive models from deep learning features in digital pathology, as an hallmark of reproducibility. We introduce the DAPPER framework for validation based on a rigorous Data Analysis Plan derived from the FDAs MAQC project, designed to analyse causes of variability in predictive biomarkers. We apply the framework on models that identify tissue of origin on 787 Whole Slide Images from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. We test 3 different deep learning architectures (VGG, ResNet, Inception) as feature extractors and three classifiers (a fully connected multilayer, Support Vector Machine and Random Forests) and work with 4 datasets (5, 10, 20 or 30 classes), for a total 53000 tiles at 512 x 512 resolution. We analyze accuracy and feature stability of the machine learning classifiers, also demonstrating the need for random features and random labels diagnostic tests to identify selection bias and risks for reproducibility. Further, we use the deep features from the VGG model from GTEx on the KIMIA24 dataset for identification of slide of origin (24 classes) to train a classifier on 1060 annotated tiles and validated on 265 unseen ones. The DAPPER software, including its deep learning backbone pipeline and the HINT (Histological Imaging - Newsy Tiles) benchmark dataset derived from GTEx, is released as a basis for standardization and validation initiatives in AI for Digital Pathology.\n\nAuthor summaryIn this study, we examine the issue of evaluating accuracy of predictive models from deep learning features in digital pathology, as an hallmark of reproducibility. It is indeed a top priority that reproducibility-by-design gets adopted as standard practice in building and validating AI methods in the healthcare domain. Here we introduce DAPPER, a first framework to evaluate deep features and classifiers in digital pathology, based on a rigorous data analysis plan originally developed in the FDAs MAQC initiative for predictive biomarkers from massive omics data. We apply DAPPER on models trained to identify tissue of origin from the HINT benchmark dataset of 53000 tiles from 787 Whole Slide Images in the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. We analyze accuracy and feature stability of different deep learning architectures (VGG, ResNet and Inception) as feature extractors and classifiers (a fully connected multilayer, SVMs and Random Forests) on up to 20 classes. Further, we use the deep features from the VGG model (trained on HINT) on the 1300 annotated tiles of the KIMIA24 dataset for identification of slide of origin (24 classes). The DAPPER software is available together with the HINT benchmark dataset.

bioinformatics↗