Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Buschmann, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Buschmann, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Accurate microRNA annotation of animal genomes using trained covariance models of curated microRNA complements in MirMachine

The annotation of microRNAs, an important class of post-transcriptional regulators, depends on the availability of transcriptomics data and expert knowledge. This led to a large gap between novel genomes made available and high-quality microRNA complements. Using >16,000 microRNAs from the manually curated microRNA gene database MirGeneDB, we generated trained covariance models for all conserved microRNA families. These models are available in MirMachine, our new tool for the annotation of conserved microRNA complements from genomes only. We successfully applied MirMachine to a wide range of animal species, including those with very large genomes, additional genome duplications and extinct species, where smallRNA sequencing will be hard to achieve. We further describe a microRNA score of expected microRNAs that can be used to assess the completeness of genome assemblies. MirMachine closes a long-persisting gap in the microRNA field facilitating automated genome annotation pipelines and deeper studies on the evolution of genome regulation, even in extinct organisms. HighlightsO_LIAn annotation pipeline using trained covariance models of microRNA families C_LIO_LIEnables massive parallel annotation of microRNA complements of genomes C_LIO_LIMirMachine creates meaningful annotations for very large and extinct genomes C_LIO_LImicroRNA score to assess genome assembly completeness C_LI Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=129 SRC="FIGDIR/small/517654v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (45K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ee2bf1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18719c1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@abcfb6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d1c368_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

bioinformatics↗

Inflated False Negative Rates Undermine Reproducibility In Task-Based fMRI

Reproducibility is generally regarded as a hallmark of scientific validity. It can be undermined by two very different factors, namely inflated false positive rates or inflated false negative rates. Here we investigate the role of the second factor, i.e. the degree to which true effects are not detected reliably. The availability of large public databases and also supercomputing allows us to tackle this problem quantitatively. Specifically, we estimated the reproducibility in task-based fMRI data over different samples randomly drawn from a large cohort of subjects obtained from the Human Connectome Project. We use the full cohort as a standard of reference to approximate true positive effects, and compute the fraction of those effects that was detected reliably using standard software packages at various smaller sample sizes. We found that with standard sample sizes this fraction was less than 25 percent. We conclude that inflated false negative rates are a major factor that undermine reproducibility. We introduce a new statistical inference algorithm based on a novel test statistic and show that it improves reproducibility without inflating false positive rates.

neuroscience↗