Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Burnett, A. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Burnett, A. C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Genetic diversity in gene regulatory interactions underlies the response to soil drying in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon

Gene expression is a quantitative trait under the control of genetic and environmental factors and their interaction, so-called GxE. Understanding the mechanisms driving GxE is fundamental for ensuring stable crop performance across environments and for predicting the response of natural populations to climate change. Gene expression is regulated through complex molecular networks, yet the interactions between genotype and environment on genome-wide regulatory networks are rarely considered. In this study, we model genome-scale gene expression variation between two natural accessions of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon and their response to soil drying. We identified genotypic, environmental, and GxE responses in physiological, metabolic, and gene expression traits. We then identified gene regulation conservation and variation among conditions and genotypes, simplified as co-expression clusters in each combination of genotype and environmental treatment. Putative gene regulatory interactions are inferred as network edges with a graphical modelling approach, resulting in hypotheses about gene-gene interactions specific to -- or with higher affinity in -- one genotype, one treatment, or in one genotype under treatment. We further find that some gene-gene interactions are conserved across conditions such that differential expression of one gene is apparently transmitted to a target gene. These variably detected edges cluster together in co-expression modules, suggestive of different constraints or selection strength acting on specific pathways. These variable features of gene regulatory networks may represent candidates modulate environmental response via genome editing, and suggest possible targets of evolutionary change in gene regulatory networks associated with phenotypic plasticity.

plant biology↗

Lessons from relatives: C4 photosynthesis enhances CO2 assimilation during the low-light phase of fluctuations.

Despite the global importance of species with C4 photosynthesis, there is a lack of consensus regarding C4 performance under fluctuating light. Contrasting hypotheses and experimental evidence suggest that C4 photosynthesis is either less, or more efficient in fixing carbon under fluctuating light than the ancestral C3 form. Two main issues were identified that may underly the lack of consensus: neglect of evolutionary distance between selected C3 and C4 species and use of contrasting fluctuating light treatments. To circumvent these issues, we compared photosynthetic responses to fluctuating light across three independent phylogenetically controlled comparisons between C3 and C4 species from Alloteropsis, Flaveria, and Cleome genera under 21% and 2% O2. Leaves were subjected to repetitive stepwise changes in light intensity (800 and 100 {micro}mol m-2 s-1 PFD) with three contrasting durations: 6, 30 and 300 seconds. These experiments reconcile the opposing results found across previous studies showing that 1) stimulation of CO2 assimilation in C4 species during the low light phase was both stronger and more sustained than in C3 species; 2) CO2 assimilation patterns during the high light phase were genus-specific rather than impacted by photosynthetic pathway; and 3) the duration of each light step in the fluctuation regime can strongly influence experimental outcomes. One sentence significance statementComparing photosynthesis in three pairs of closely related C3 and C4 species across three fluctuating light regimes showed that C4 photosynthesis has a systematic advantage under the low light phase not related to suppression of photorespiration, while the comparative efficiency under the high light phase was not determined by photosynthetic pathway.

plant biology↗

High light can alleviate chilling stress in maize

Chilling stress has the potential to significantly decrease growth and yield of sensitive crop plants such as maize. Based on previous work, high light during chilling may exacerbate stress via enhanced photoinhibition but may also aid acclimation responses to chilling. To further understand molecular processes behind responses to chilling with and without high light, two maize accessions with contrasting tolerance (B73 and F7) were exposed to three treatments: chilling, chilling combined with high light and high light alone. Transcriptome data indicated that the chilling treatment resulted in the largest stress response. Addition of high light to chilling stress had a mitigating, rather than additive effect on stress, as evident from alleviated repression of photosynthesis-related genes and less induction of stress-related pathways such as abscisic acid signalling and senescence compared with the response to chilling alone. Five transcription factors belonging to well-known stress-related transcription factor families were identified as candidates for driving the transcriptional changes behind the high-light induced mitigation of chilling stress. Physiological measurements of non-photochemical quenching and the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II corroborated the transcriptome results, showing that the addition of high light alleviated photoinhibition and membrane damage caused by chilling. High light alone had little effect on the plant transcriptome or physiological response. Overall, this study overturns previous reports, offers a new outlook on the impact of high light during chilling stress and has the potential to provide clearer targets for crop engineering.

plant biology↗