Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Burlot, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Burlot, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Unravelling the genetic architecture of persistence in production, quality, and efficiency traits in laying hens at late production stages

BackgroundThe laying hen industry aims to extend production for the economic and environmental benefits it offers, while at the same time facing the challenges of declining egg production and quality in aging hens. To explore trait persistence, we studied 998 Rhode Island Red purebred hens from the Novogen nucleus. We recorded daily egg production from 70 to 92 weeks of age and measured individual feed intake twice a week for three weeks, starting at 70, 80, and 90 weeks, as well as body weight at the start and at the end of each feed intake recording period. Random regression models were used to study trait trajectories over time, and PCA and hierarchical clustering were applied to identify groups of hens based on estimated breeding values for the intercept and slope of traits trajectory. ResultsResults showed different aging trajectories among traits. Daily body weight variation, Feed conversion ratio, Haugh unit and yolk percentage showed persistence (i.e., stability) over the measured period. On the contrary, daily feed intake, residual feed intake, laying rate, egg mass, eggshell breaking strength and stiffness decreased over time, while body weight, mean egg weight and eggshell colour increased. To assess the feasibility of selecting for trait persistence, we estimated the genetic variance of the slope and its correlation with the intercept. We found that, for egg weight and eggshell colour, genetic variance of the slope was negligible, indicating that selection for persistence on these traits requires other means. On the contrary, the slope for other traits such as laying rate and residual feed intake showed significant additive genetic variance. Strong genetic correlations between trait estimates at different ages were also observed and heritabilities estimates were low to high depending of the traits and period. ConclusionThe study explores hens trait persistence from 70 to 92 weeks, suggesting potential for improved egg production persistence. Challenges arise from low genetic variances impacting the efficiency of the potential selection on persistence. Clustering analysis reveals distinctive response patterns to elongation of production and underlined that selecting for enhanced persistence of different traits will necessitate compromises in breeding goals.

genetics↗

Relevance of genomic evaluation for egg quality traits in layers

BackgroundGenomic evaluation, based on thousands of genetic markers, has become the standard evaluation methodology in dairy cattle breeding programs over the past few years. Despite the many differences between dairy cattle breeding and poultry breeding, genomic selection seems very promising for the avian sector, and studies are currently being conducted to optimize avian selection schemes. In this optimization perspective, one of the key parameters is to properly predict the accuracy of genomic evaluation in pure line layers.\n\nMethodsBoth genetic evaluation and genomic evaluation were performed on three candidate populations (male and female), using different sizes of phenotypic records on five egg quality traits and at two different ages. The methodologies used were BLUP & ssGBLUP, and variance-covariance matrices were estimated through REML. To estimate evaluation accuracy, the LR method was implemented. Four statistics were used to assess the relative accuracy of the estimated breeding values of candidates, their bias and dispersion, as well as the differences between genetic evaluation and genomic evaluation.\n\nResultsIt was observed that genomic evaluation, whether performed on males or females, always proved more accurate than genetic evaluation. The gain was higher when phenotypic information was narrowed and an augmentation of the size of the reference population led to an increase in accuracy prediction, for what regards genomic evaluation. By taking into account the increase of selection intensity and the decrease of the generation interval induced by genomic selection, the expected annual genetic gain would be higher with ancestry-based genomic evaluation of male candidates than with genetic evaluation based on collaterals. This advantage of genomic selection over genetic selection requires to be studied in more details for female candidates.\n\nConclusionsIn conclusion, in the population studied, genomic evaluation for egg quality traits of breeding birds at birth seems a promising strategy, at least for what regards males selection.

genomics↗