Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bugler, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Bugler, H..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

GABA-Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Deep Learning Quality Assessment Framework

PurposeMotivated by the need to improve GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) quality, we developed a three-module framework to improve transient averaging based on quality. We hypothesized that training a deep learning (DL) to differentiate spectrum quality could improve transient averaging compared to traditional averaging. MethodsThe transient averaging framework was approached through three modules: (1) a continuous-valued automated quality labeling algorithm using both traditional and recently developed MRS quality metrics, (2) a dual-domain (time and frequency) DL model that learns from these quality labels to assess quality scores for new data, and (3) a transient weighting algorithm informed by DL quality scores. The labeling algorithm was used to produce quality labels focused on retaining GABA peak shape in difference spectra (1) to train the DL model (2). The DL model quality scores were used to assign weights (3) for transient pairs within the final average difference spectrum. Results were compared to an existing software weighting algorithm for transient averaging and traditional transient averaging. ResultsRetaining only GABA-edited transient pairs with quality labels above zero, defined by metrics evaluating peak shapes, resulted in overall better traditional and recently developed mean metric values as well as better visual assessment of GABA and Glx peaks. Applying the trained DL model to in vivo scans, the average difference spectra calculated from the DL quality scores and weighting algorithm resulted in lower fit errors than averaging all transients with equal weights. ConclusionThe proposed framework can optimize transient averaging based on quality for edited-MRS.

bioengineering↗

SMART MRS: A Simulated MEGA-PRESS Artifacts Toolbox for GABA-edited MRS

PurposeTo create a Python-based toolbox to simulate commonly occurring artifacts for single voxel Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)-edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) data. MethodsThe toolbox was designed to maximize user flexibility and contains artifact, applied, input/output (I/O), and support functions. The artifact functions can produce spurious echoes, eddy currents, nuisance peaks, line broadening, baseline contamination, linear frequency drifts, and frequency and phase shift artifacts. Applied functions combine or apply specific parameter values to produce recognizable effects such as lipid peak and motion contamination. I/O and support functions provide additional functionality to accommodate different kinds of input data (MATLAB FID-A .mat files, nifti-mrs files), which vary by domain (time vs. frequency), collection type (edited vs. non-edited) and scale. ResultsUsers may provide some or all of the required artifact function parameter values which will result in artifacts of different appearances. Visual assessment confirms the resemblance of simulated compared to in vivo produced artifacts. ConclusionOur pip installable Python artifact simulated toolbox SMART_MRS is meant to enhance the diversity and quality of existing simulated edited-MRS data and is complementary to existing MRS simulation software.

bioengineering↗

Advancing GABA-edited MRS Research through a Reconstruction Challenge

PurposeTo create a benchmark for the comparison of machine learning-based Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)-edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) reconstruction models using one quarter of the transients typically acquired during a complete scan. MethodsThe Edited-MRS reconstruction challenge had three tracks with the purpose of evaluating machine learning models trained to reconstruct simulated (Track 1), homogeneous in vivo (Track 2), and heterogeneous in vivo (Track 3) GABA-edited MRS data. Four quantitative metrics were used to evaluate the results: mean squared error (MSE), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linewidth, and a shape score metric that we proposed. Challenge participants were given three months to create, train and submit their models. Challenge organizers provided open access to a baseline U-NET model for initial comparison, as well as simulated data, in vivo data, and tutorials and guides for adding synthetic noise to the simulations. ResultsThe most successful approach for Track 1 simulated data was a covariance matrix convolutional neural network model, while for Track 2 and Track 3 in vivo data, a vision transformer model operating on a spectrogram representation of the data achieved the most success. Deep learning (DL) based reconstructions with reduced transients achieved equivalent or better SNR, linewidth and fit error as conventional reconstructions with the full amount of transients. However, some DL models also showed the ability to optimize the linewidth and SNR values without actually improving overall spectral quality, pointing to the need for more robust metrics. ConclusionThe edited-MRS reconstruction challenge showed that the top performing DL based edited-MRS reconstruction pipelines can obtain with a reduced number of transients equivalent metrics to conventional reconstruction pipelines using the full amount of transients. The proposed metric shape score was positively correlated with challenge track outcome indicating that it is well-suited to evaluate spectral quality.

bioengineering↗

Frequency and Phase Correction of GABA-Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy using Complex-Valued Convolutional Neural Networks

PurposeTo determine the significance of complex-valued inputs and complex-valued convolutions compared to real-valued inputs and real-valued convolutions in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for frequency and phase correction (FPC) of GABA-edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) data. MethodsAn ablation study was performed to determine the most effective input (real or complex) and convolution type (real or complex) to predict frequency and phase shifts in GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS data using CNNs. The best CNN model was subsequently compared to two recently proposed deep learning (DL) methods for FPC of GABA-edited MRS. All methods were trained using the same experimental setup and evaluated using GABAs signal-to-noise ratio and linewidth, Choline artifact, and by analyzing the reconstructed final difference spectrum. Statistical significance and effect size were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Cohens d respectively. ResultsThe ablation study showed that using complex values for the input represented by real and imaginary channels in our model input tensor, with real (conventional) convolutions was most effective for FPC. For the comparative study, the simulated data test set showed that our CNN model that received complex-valued inputs with real convolutions outperformed models it was compared against with a lower mean absolute error (p<0.05). For the in vivo data test set, our model performed similarly to other DL FPC models. ConclusionOur results indicate that the optimal CNN configuration for GABA-edited MRS FPC uses a complex-valued input and real-valued convolutions. This model outperformed existing DL models on simulated data and performed similarly on in vivo data.

neuroscience↗