Buchalski, M. R. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2025

Resolving the evolutionary history of bighorn sheep to inform future management

Although translocations can be effective for augmenting and restoring wild populations, they can disrupt native patterns of genetic structure, diversity, and local adaptation, thereby hampering conservation efforts. Managers must weigh potential costs and benefits of choosing well-differentiated donor individuals that could confer a boost to genetic diversity while avoiding outbreeding depression or ecological mismatch. This decision is more daunting when taxonomy is unclear or debated. For example, bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) populations in the United States that have been managed as the "California" lineage (part of the formerly recognized subspecies O. c. californiana) originate from serial translocations sourced from populations in British Columbia, resulting in reduced genetic diversity and elevated risk of inbreeding. After research on skull shape and RFLP analysis of mtDNA failed to find support for that subspecies, some jurisdictions treated the California lineage as part of the Rocky Mountain subspecies (O. c. canadensis) and mixed individuals in subsequent translocations, in part to increase genetic diversity of bottlenecked populations. Yet detailed genetic data addressing validity of those putative lineages were lacking. We reconstructed the genetic history of bighorn sheep by sampling the major putative subspecies or lineages, focusing on native (remnant) genetic variation, and generating high-throughput DNA sequencing data ([~]15,000-25,000 SNPs). Complementary phylogenetic and population genetic analyses supported the distinctiveness of four bighorn lineages at levels corresponding to subspecies. Our results confirm the genetic identity of the no longer putative California bighorn lineage, answering a question that puzzled geneticists and managers for decades. Moving forward, we recommend that managers 1) maintain the natural variation held in native populations by protecting them from intentional translocations or unintentional mixing with nearby populations; 2) prioritize withinlineage translocations for population augmentation or repatriation to previously occupied regions; and 3) cautiously consider any translocations that would lead to mixing of distinct evolutionary lineages.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Broad-scale puma connectivity could restore genomic diversity to fine-scale coastal populations

Urbanization is decreasing wildlife habitat and connectivity worldwide, including for apex predators, such as the puma (Puma concolor). Puma populations along Californias central and southern coastal habitats have experienced rapid fragmentation from development, leading to calls for demographic and genetic management. To address urgent conservation genomic concerns, we used double-digest restriction-site associated DNA (ddRAD) sequencing to analyze 16,285 genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 401 broadly sampled pumas. Our analyses indicated support for 4-10 geographically nested, broad- to fine-scale genetic clusters. At the broadest scale, the 4 genetic clusters had high genetic diversity and exhibited low linkage disequilibrium, indicating pumas have retained statewide genomic diversity. However, multiple lines of evidence indicated substructure, including 10 fine-scale genetic clusters, some of which exhibited allelic fixation and linkage disequilibrium. Fragmented populations along the Southern Coast and Central Coast had particularly low genetic diversity and strong linkage disequilibrium, indicating genetic drift and close inbreeding. Our results demonstrate that genetically at-risk populations are typically nested within a broader-scale group of interconnected populations that collectively retains high genetic diversity and heterogeneous fixations. Thus, extant variation at the broader scale has potential to restore diversity to local populations if management actions can enhance vital gene flow and recombine locally sequestered genetic diversity. These state- and genome-wide results are critically important for science-based conservation and management practices. Our broad- and fine-scale population genomic analysis highlights the information that can be gained from population genomic studies aiming to provide guidance for fragmented population conservation management.

zoology↗