Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Brügger, R. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Brügger, R. K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The ontogeny of play in a highly cooperative monkey, the common marmoset

Play is mostly observed in juveniles in mammals, and the type of play (social, locomotor and object play) tends to mirror adult function. In some species, also adults play with immatures, in particular if same-aged play partners are lacking and adults also invest in caretaking. We studied the ontogeny of play in cooperatively breeding common marmoset groups composed of parents and twin offspring between the age of two to six months. Social play was by far the most prevalent and increased with age. Adults were important play partners: Before 19 weeks old, the play partners of immatures was an adult in 54% of the time spent playing socially. After week 19, this proportion decreased to 29%. The rest of the social play time was spent playing with their twin. Thus, despite the constant presence of a twin, adult-immature play remained considerable, with equal contributions by mothers and fathers and no trade-offs with other care-taking behaviours (i.e., carrying and food sharing) for either of the parents. Notably, parents avoided playing simultaneously, presumably to avoid periods when no one could be vigilant. Together, these results resonate strongly with the highly interdependent and cooperative lifestyle of common marmosets. HighlightsO_LISocial play is the predominant form of play in marmosets and increases between the age of 2 to 6 months C_LIO_LIParents are important play partners for immatures during ontogeny C_LIO_LIThe odds of playing with the twin rather than a parent increases with age C_LIO_LIMothers and fathers play at similar amounts with the immatures C_LIO_LIMothers and fathers take turns and almost never play simultaneously with the immatures C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗

Marmosets mutually compensate for differences in rhythms when coordinating vigilance

Synchronisation is widespread in animals, and studies have often emphasised how this seemingly complex phenomenon can emerge from very simple rules. However, the amount of flexibility and control that animals might have over synchronisation properties, such as the strength of coupling, remains underexplored. Here, we studied how pairs of marmoset monkeys coordinated vigilance while feeding. By modelling them as coupled oscillators, we noted that (1) individual marmosets do not show perfect periodicity in vigilance behaviours, (2) even then, pairs of marmosets developed a tendency to take turns being vigilant, a case of anti-phase synchrony, (3) marmosets could couple flexibly; the coupling strength varied with every new joint feeding bout, and (4) marmosets could control the coupling strength; dyads showed increased coupling if they began in a more desynchronised state. Such flexibility and control over synchronisation require more than simple interaction rules. Minimally, animals must estimate the current degree of asynchrony and adjust their behaviour accordingly. Moreover, the fact that each marmoset is inherently non-periodic adds to the cognitive demand. Overall, our study taps into the cognitive aspects of synchronisation and provides a mathematical framework to investigate the phenomenon more widely, where individuals may not display perfectly rhythmic behaviours.

animal behavior and cognition↗