Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Brkanac, Z.

Publications and source records attributed to Brkanac, Z..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Data Descriptor: Human whole exome genotype data for Alzheimer's Disease

Bigger sample size can help to identify new genetic variants contributing to an increased risk of developing Alzheimers disease. However, the heterogeneity of the whole-exome sequencing (WES) data generation methods presents a challenge to a joint analysis. Here we present a bioinformatics strategy for joint calling 20,504 WES samples collected across nine studies and sequenced using ten different capture kits in fourteen sequencing centers in the Alzheimers Disease Sequencing Project. gVCFs of samples were joint-called by the Genome Center for Alzheimers Disease into a single VCF, containing only positions within the union of capture kits. The VCF was then processed using specific strategies to account for the batch effects arising from the use of different capture kits from different studies. We identified 8.2 million autosomal variants. 96.82% of the variants are high-quality, and are located in 28,579 Ensembl transcripts. 41% of the variants are intronic and 15% are missense variants. 1.8% of the variants are with CADD>30. Our new strategy for processing these diversely generated WES samples has shown to generate high-quality data. The improved ability to combine data sequenced in different batches benefits the whole genomics research community. The WES data are accessible to the scientific community via https://dss.niagads.org/.

genetics↗

Suppression and facilitation of human neural responses

Efficient neural processing depends on regulating responses through suppression and facilitation of neural activity. Utilizing a well-known visual motion paradigm that evokes behavioral suppression and facilitation, and combining 5 different methodologies (behavioral psychophysics, computational modeling, functional MRI, pharmacology, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy), we provide evidence that challenges commonly held assumptions about the neural processes underlying suppression and facilitation. We show that: 1) both suppression and facilitation can emerge from a single, computational principle - divisive normalization; there is no need to invoke separate neural mechanisms, 2) neural suppression and facilitation in the motion-selective area MT mirror perception, but strong suppression also occurs in earlier visual areas, and 3) suppression is not driven by GABA-mediated inhibition. Thus, while commonly used spatial suppression paradigms may provide insight into neural response magnitudes in visual areas, they cannot be used to infer neural inhibition.

neuroscience↗