Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Britto, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Britto, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Chronic nicotine increases midbrain dopamine neuron activity and biases individual strategies towards reduced exploration in a foraging task.

Long-term exposure to nicotine alters brain circuits and induces profound changes in decision-making strategies, affecting behaviors both related and unrelated to drug seeking and consumption. Using an intracranial self-stimulation reward-based foraging task, we investigated the impact of chronic nicotine on the trade-off between exploitation and exploration, and the role of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine (DA) neuron activity in decision-making unrelated to nicotine-seeking. Model-based and archetypal analysis revealed a substantial inter-individual variability in decision-making strategies, with mice passively exposed to chronic nicotine visiting more frequently options associated with higher reward probability and therefore shifting toward a more exploitative profile compared to non-exposed animals. We then mimicked the effect of chronic nicotine on the tonic activity of VTA DA neurons using optogenetics, and found that photo-stimulated mice had a behavioral phenotype very close to that of mice exposed to nicotine, suggesting that the dopaminergic control of the exploration/exploitation balance is altered under nicotine exposure. Our results thus reveal a key role of tonic midbrain DA in the exploration/exploitation trade-off and highlight a potential mechanism by which nicotine affects decision-making.

neuroscience↗

Quality Matters: Biocuration Experts on the Impact of Duplication and Other Data Quality Issues in Biological Databases

The volume of biological database records is growing rapidly, populated by complex records drawn from heterogeneous sources. A specific challenge is duplication, that is, the presence of redundancy (records with high similarity) or inconsistency (dissimilar records that correspond to the same entity). The characteristics (which records are duplicates), impact (why duplicates are significant), and solutions (how to address duplication), are not well understood. Studies on the topic are neither recent nor comprehensive. In addition, other data quality issues, such as inconsistencies and inaccuracies, are also of concern in the context of biological databases. A primary focus of this paper is to present and consolidate the opinions of over 20 experts and practitioners on the topic of duplication in biological sequence databases. The results reveal that survey participants believe that duplicate records are diverse; that the negative impacts of duplicates are severe, while positive impacts depend on correct identification of duplicates; and that duplicate detection methods need to be more precise, scalable, and robust. A secondary focus is to consider other quality issues. We observe that biocuration is the key mechanism used to ensure the quality of this data, and explore the issues through a case study of curation in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot as well as an interview with an experienced biocurator. While biocuration is a vital solution for handling of data quality issues, a broader community effort is needed to provide adequate support for thorough biocuration in the face of widespread quality concerns.

scientific communication and education↗