Biology subjects

Bristol, M. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Bristol, M. L..

16 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Differentiation-Dependent Proximity Proteomics Identifies Novel Host Factors Linked to HPV16 E2 Function

Human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) is a causative agent of oropharyngeal, cervical and anogenital cancers. The viral E2 protein is essential for viral genome replication, transcriptional regulation, episome maintenance, and activation of the host DNA damage response. Despite its central role, the full network of HPV16 E2 interactions with host proteins remains incompletely defined, particularly under differentiating conditions which support the complete viral life cycle. In this study, we used TurboID-based proximity labeling to characterize the interactome of HPV16 E2 and known host partner protein TOPBP1, in both undifferentiated monolayer and differentiating keratinocytes. We generated stable keratinocyte lines expressing doxycycline-inducible TurboID-tagged HPV16 E2 and confirmed that the tagged protein retained transcriptional, replicative, and DNA damage-inducing functions. Mass spectrometry analysis of streptavidin-enriched proteins identified both known and novel E2-associated host factors, including chromatin regulators, DNA repair proteins, and nucleolar components. Comparative analysis revealed a substantial overlap between E2 and TOPBP1 interactomes, and in situ validation by proximity ligation assay identified nucleolin (NCL) as a differentiation-dependent factor whose interaction with E2 is stabilized by TOPBP1. Functional studies demonstrated that NCL is required for episomal genome maintenance, highlighting a cooperative E2-TOPBP1- NCL axis critical for viral genome stability during differentiation. These findings provide a comprehensive view of the E2-associated protein landscape in stratified epithelial cells and reveal a mechanistic pathway through which HPV16 co-opts host factors to support genome maintenance, productive replication, and persistence. ImportanceHuman papillomaviruses (HPVs) establish persistent infections in stratified epithelia and rely on host DNA damage and repair factors to support their replication. The E2 protein is central to viral genome replication and maintenance, and depends heavily on its interaction with the host factor TOPBP1 for these functions. Here, we define the E2 and TOPBP1 interactomes in differentiating keratinocytes, and identify nucleolin (NCL) a critical differentiation- and TOPBP1-dependent E2 partner required for episomal genome stability. These findings expand the understanding of how HPV16 coordinates viral replication with host chromatin and DNA repair networks, uncovering a cooperative E2-TOPBP1-NCL axis that may represent a new target for antiviral intervention.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2025

E2 displacement of CIP2A from TOPBP1 activates the DNA damage response during papillomavirus life cycles

The papillomavirus life cycle is intricately linked to epithelial differentiation, and the virus manipulates the differentiation process to facilitate viral production. One such manipulation is activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) which promotes viral replication via homologous recombination. This report demonstrates that the papillomavirus transcription/replication/segregation factor E2 activates the DNA damage response (DDR). During differentiation, E2 displacement of CIP2A from TOPBP1 causes CIP2A to bind and inhibit PP2A resulting in DDR activation via ATM phosphorylation. The DDR promotes inhibitory interaction of DBC1 with the class III deacetylase SIRT1, which further boosts the DDR via increased acetylation and stability of viral and host proteins. E2 forms a complex with TOPBP1 and ATM, while preventing ATR activation by blocking TOPBP1-ATR interaction. This "ATM up ATR down" phenotype promotes viral replication via ATM promotion of homologous recombination, and cell proliferation via inhibition of ATR. We demonstrate this mechanism of DDR activation in multiple systems: keratinocytes expressing only E2, in foreskin keratinocytes immortalized by HPV16, in HPV16 positive keratinocytes derived from a cervical lesion, in pre-neoplastic lesions induced by mouse papillomavirus MmuPV1, in head and neck cancer cell lines that retain E2 expression, and in HPV16 positive oropharyngeal patient derived xenografts that retain E2 expression. ATM inhibition preferentially killed cells expressing E2, presenting a novel strategy for treating HPV early preneoplasia and a large subset of HPV+ oropharyngeal cancers retaining E2 expression and episomal genomes.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2025

The Utility of Fibroblast Co-culture for the Maintenance of Episomes in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancer Models

Human papillomavirus-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HPV+ HNSCCs) lack early diagnostics and continue to rise in incidence. HPV16 has been detected in [~]90% of HPV+ oropharyngeal cancers (HPV+ OPCs), an anatomical subset of HNSCC, with the majority retaining episomal viral genomes. Despite this, existing episomal HPV16+ OPC cell lines are especially scarce. UMSCC104s were initially reported as episomal; however, the literature contains conflicting reports regarding the genome status of these cells. We now show that UMSCC104s rapidly undergo integration and E2 loss under standard monoculture, and later lots are fully integrated. These findings resolve prior discrepancies and underscore the instability of episomes in monoculture. Accurate models of HPV-driven cancers are critically needed. We propose fibroblast co-culture methods, traditionally utilized for HPV+ keratinocyte models, as a strategy to preserve episomal status in cancer models by supporting viral and host genome stability.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2025

HPV16 recruitment of SMARCAL1 to viral and host replication forks is required for the viral life cycle

High-risk human papillomaviruses (HR HPVs) are responsible for around 5% of the worlds cancer burden. Activation and interaction with the host DNA damage response (DDR) promotes the HPV16 life cycle. This study demonstrates a crucial interaction between HPV16 and SMARCAL1, a protein involved in the stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks. SMARCAL1 can complex with E2, is recruited to E1-E2 replicating DNA, and SMARCAL1 knockdown reduces the fidelity of E1-E2 mediated DNA replication in C33a cells but does not alter replication levels. SMARCAL1 is recruited to the HPV16 genome in HPV16-immortalized foreskin keratinocytes (HFK+HPV16), and in situ protein interaction with nascent DNA replication forks (SIRF) assays demonstrated that SMARCAL1 is hyper-recruited to host replication forks in HFK+HPV16 cells. Using COMET, DNA fiber, and cell growth assays it was determined that knockdown of SMARCAL1 increased DNA damage and impaired replication fork progression in HFK+HPV16 cells, ultimately resulting in growth arrest. The viral genome integrates following SMARCAL1 knockdown in HFK+HPV16 cells. Therefore, SMARCAL1 facilitates host and viral DNA replication in HFK+HPV16 cells. Overall, the results demonstrate that HPV16 promotes SMARCAL1 recruitment to viral and host replication forks and is an essential factor for the HPV16 life cycle. The results expand our understanding of DDR proteins that regulate the HPV16 life cycle, and suggest that inhibition of SMARCAL1 function represents a novel anti-viral strategy for the treatment and prevention of HPV infections. ImportanceHPV16 is responsible for the majority of HPV+ cancers, contributing to 54% of cervical cancers and [~]90% of HPV+HNSCC. Integration of viral genomes into host DNA can promote cervical cancer progression and correlates with poor prognosis in HPV-associated HNSCC, where around 70% of HPV+ cancers contain episomal viral genomes. Developing effective antiviral therapies requires a deeper understanding of the interplay between viral replication and host DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. This report demonstrates that SMARCAL1 is essential for HPV16 replication and keratinocyte proliferation and that its depletion leads to replication stress, DNA damage, and viral genome integration. This work underscores the delicate balance between viral exploitation of the host DDR and the risk of genome instability. These insights contribute to the broader understanding of HPV pathogenesis and may inform the development of therapeutic strategies targeting viral replication to prevent disease progression and improve clinical outcomes in HPV-associated cancers.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2024

Fibroblasts Regulate the Transformation Potential of Human Papillomavirus-positive Keratinocytes

Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is necessary but insufficient for viral oncogenesis. Additional contributing co-factors, such as immune evasion and viral integration have been implicated in HPV-induced cancer progression. It is widely accepted that HPV+ keratinocytes require co-culture with fibroblasts to maintain viral episome expression, yet the exact mechanisms for this have yet to be elucidated. Here we present comprehensive RNA sequencing and proteomic analysis demonstrating that fibroblasts not only support the viral life cycle, but reduce HPV+ keratinocyte transformation. Our co-culture models offer novel insights into HPV-related transformation mechanisms. HighlightsO_LIFibroblasts support HPV RNA expression and episomal maintenance in HPV+ keratinocytes C_LIO_LIFibroblasts reduce EMT related expression in HPV+ keratinocytes C_LIO_LIFibroblasts promote EMT related expression in E6E7+ keratinocytes C_LI

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Fibroblast Stromal Support Model for Predicting Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancer Drug Responses.

Currently, there are no specific antiviral therapeutic approaches targeting Human papillomaviruses (HPVs), which cause around 5% of all human cancers. Specific antiviral reagents are particularly needed for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers (HPV+OPCs) whose incidence is increasing and for which there are no early diagnostic tools available. We and others have demonstrated that the estrogen receptor alpha (ER) is overexpressed in HPV+OPCs, compared to HPV-negative cancers in this region, and that these elevated levels are associated with an improved disease outcome. Utilizing this HPV+ specific overexpression profile, we previously demonstrated that estrogen attenuates the growth and cell viability of HPV+ keratinocytes and HPV+ cancer cells in vitro. Expansion of this work in vivo failed to replicate this sensitization. The role of stromal support from the tumor microenvironment (TME) has previously been tied to both the HPV lifecycle and in vivo therapeutic responses. Our investigations revealed that in vitro co-culture with fibroblasts attenuated HPV+ specific estrogen growth responses. Continuing to monopolize on the HPV+ specific overexpression of ER, our co-culture models then assessed the suitability of the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), raloxifene and tamoxifen, and showed growth attenuation in a variety of our models to one or both of these drugs in vitro. Utilization of these SERMs in vivo closely resembled the sensitization predicted by our co-culture models. Therefore, the in vitro fibroblast co-culture model better predicts in vivo responses. We propose that utilization of our co-culture in vitro model can accelerate cancer therapeutic drug discovery. ImportanceHuman papillomavirus-related cancers (HPV+ cancers) remain a significant public health concern, and specific clinical approaches are desperately needed. In translating drug response data from in vitro to in vivo, the fibroblasts of the adjacent stromal support network play a key role. Our study presents the utilization of a fibroblast 2D co-culture system to better predict translational drug assessments for HPV+ cancers. We also suggest that this co-culture system should be considered for other translational approaches. Predicting even a portion of treatment paradigms that may fail in vivo with a co-culture model will yield significant time, effort, resource, and cost efficiencies.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2024

A human papillomavirus 16 E2-TopBP1 dependent SIRT1-p300 acetylation switch regulates mitotic viral and human protein levels

An interaction between human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) E2 and the cellular proteins TopBP1 and BRD4 is required for E2 plasmid segregation function. The E2-TopBP1 interaction promotes increased mitotic E2 protein levels in U2OS and N/Tert-1 cells, as well as in human foreskin keratinocytes immortalized by HPV16 (HFK+HPV16). SIRT1 deacetylation reduces E2 protein stability and here we demonstrate that increased E2 acetylation occurs during mitosis in a TopBP1 interacting dependent manner, promoting E2 mitotic stabilization. p300 mediates E2 acetylation and acetylation is increased due to E2 switching off SIRT1 function during mitosis in a TopBP1 interacting dependent manner, confirmed by increased p53 stability and acetylation on lysine 382, a known target for SIRT1 deacetylation. SIRT1 can complex with E2 in growing cells but is unable to do so during mitosis due to the E2-TopBP1 interaction; SIRT1 is also unable to complex with p53 in mitotic E2 wild type cells but can complex with p53 outside of mitosis. E2 lysines 111 and 112 are highly conserved residues across all E2 proteins and we demonstrate that K111 hyper-acetylation occurs during mitosis, promoting E2 interaction with Topoisomerase 1 (Top1). We also demonstrate that K112 ubiquitination promotes E2 proteasomal degradation during mitosis. The results present a model in which the E2-TopBP1 complex inactivates SIRT1 during mitosis and E2 acetylation on K111 by p300 increases, promoting interaction with Top1 that protects K112 from ubiquitination and therefore E2 proteasomal degradation. ImportanceHuman papillomaviruses are causative agents in around 5% of all human cancers. While there are prophylactic vaccines that will significantly alleviate HPV disease burden on future generations, there are currently no anti-viral strategies available for the treatment of HPV cancers. To generate such reagents, we must understand more about the HPV life cycle, and in particular about viral-host interactions. Here we describe a novel mitotic complex generated by the HPV16 E2 protein interacting with the host protein TopBP1 that controls the function of the deacetylase SIRT1. The E2-TopBP1 interaction disrupts SIRT1 function during mitosis in order to enhance acetylation and stability of viral and host proteins. This novel complex is essential for the HPV16 life cycle and represents a novel anti-viral therapeutic target.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Human Papillomavirus 16 replication converts SAMHD1 into a homologous recombination factor and promotes its recruitment to replicating viral DNA

We have demonstrated that SAMHD1 (sterile alpha motif and histidine-aspartic domain HD-containing protein 1) is a restriction factor for the HPV16 life cycle. Here we demonstrate that in HPV negative cervical cancer C33a cells and human foreskin keratinocytes immortalized by HPV16 (HFK+HPV16), SAMHD1 is recruited to E1-E2 replicating DNA. Homologous recombination (HR) factors are required for HPV16 replication and viral replication promotes phosphorylation of SAMHD1, which converts it from a dNTPase to an HR factor independent from E6/E7 expression. A SAMHD1 phosphor-mimic (SAMHD1 T592D) reduces E1-E2 mediated DNA replication in C33a cells and has enhanced recruitment to the replicating DNA. In HFK+HPV16 cells SAMHD1 T592D is recruited to the viral DNA and attenuates cellular growth, but does not attenuate growth in isogenic HFK cells immortalized by E6/E7 alone. SAMHD1 T592D also attenuates the development of viral replication foci following keratinocyte differentiation. The results indicated that enhanced SAMHD1 phosphorylation could be therapeutically beneficial in cells with HPV16 replicating genomes. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) can dephosphorylate SAMHD1 and PP2A function can be inhibited by endothall. We demonstrate that endothall reduces E1-E2 replication and promotes SAMHD1 recruitment to E1-E2 replicating DNA, mimicking the SAMHD1 T592D phenotypes. Finally, we demonstrate that in head and neck cancer cell lines with HPV16 episomal genomes endothall attenuates their growth and promotes recruitment of SAMHD1 to the viral genome. The results suggest that targeting cellular phosphatases has therapeutic potential for the treatment of HPV infections and cancers. ImportanceHuman papillomaviruses are causative agents in around 5% of all human cancers. The development of anti-viral therapeutics depends upon an increased understanding of the viral life cycle. Here we demonstrate that HPV16 replication converts SAMHD1 into an HR factor via phosphorylation. This phosphorylation promotes recruitment of SAMHD1 to viral DNA to assist with replication. A SAMHD1 mutant that mimics phosphorylation is hyper-recruited to viral DNA and attenuates viral replication. Expression of this mutant in HPV16 immortalized cells attenuates the growth of these cells, but not cells immortalized by the viral oncogenes E6/E7 alone. Finally, we demonstrate that the phosphatase inhibitor endothall promotes hyper-recruitment of endogenous SAMHD1 to HPV16 replicating DNA and can attenuate the growth of both HPV16 immortalized human foreskin keratinocytes and HPV16 positive head and neck cancer cell lines. We propose that phosphatase inhibitors represent a novel tool for combating HPV infections and disease.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Direct interaction with the BRD4 carboxyl-terminal motif (CTM) and TopBP1 is required for human papillomavirus 16 E2 association with mitotic chromatin and plasmid segregation function

During the human papillomavirus 16 life cycle, the E2 protein binds simultaneously to the viral genome and host chromatin throughout mitosis, ensuring viral genomes reside in daughter cell nuclei following cell division. Previously, we demonstrated that CK2 phosphorylation of E2 on serine 23 promotes interaction with TopBP1, and that this interaction is required for optimum E2 mitotic chromatin association and plasmid segregation function. Others have implicated BRD4 in mediating the plasmid segregation function of E2 and we have demonstrated that there is a TopBP1-BRD4 complex in the cell. We therefore further investigated the role of the E2-BRD4 interaction in mediating E2 association with mitotic chromatin and plasmid segregation function. Using a combination of immunofluorescence and our novel plasmid segregation assay in U2OS and N/Tert-1 cells stably expressing a variety of E2 mutants, we report that direct interaction with the BRD4 carboxyl-terminal motif (CTM) and TopBP1 is required for E2 association with mitotic chromatin and plasmid segregation. We also identify a novel TopBP1 mediated interaction between E2 and the BRD4 extra-terminal (ET) domain in vivo. Overall, the results demonstrate that direct interaction with TopBP1 and the BRD4 CTM are required for E2 mitotic chromatin association and plasmid segregation function. Disruption of this complex offers therapeutic options for targeting segregation of viral genomes into daughter cells, potentially combatting HPV16 infections, and cancers that retain episomal genomes. ImportanceHPV16 is a causative agent in around 3-4% of all human cancers and currently there are no anti-viral therapeutics available for combating this disease burden. In order to identify new therapeutic targets, we must increase our understanding of the HPV16 life cycle. Previously, we demonstrated that an interaction between E2 and the cellular protein TopBP1 mediates the plasmid segregation function of E2, allowing distribution of viral genomes into daughter nuclei following cell division. Here, we demonstrate that E2 interaction with an additional host protein, BRD4, is also essential for E2 segregation function, and that BRD4 exists in a complex with TopBP1. Overall, these results enhance our understanding of a critical part of the HPV16 life cycle and presents several therapeutic targets for disruption of the viral life cycle.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Human papillomavirus 16 E2 interaction with TopBP1 is required for E2 and viral genome stability during the viral life cycle.

CK2 phosphorylation of HPV16 E2 at serine 23 promotes interaction with TopBP1, and this interaction is important for E2 plasmid segregation function. Here we demonstrate that the E2-TopBP1 interaction is critical for E2 and viral genome stability during the viral life cycle. Introduction of the S23A mutation into the HPV16 genome results in a loss of E2 expression and viral genome integration during organotypic rafting. Co-culture of N/Tert-1+E2-S23A cells with J2 fibroblasts results in E2-S23A degradation via the proteasome, wild-type E2 is not degraded. TopBP1 siRNA treatment of N/Tert-1+E2-WT cells results in E2 degradation only in the presence of J2 cells demonstrating the critical role for TopBP1 in maintaining E2 stability. The CK2 inhibitor CX4945 promotes E2-WT degradation in the presence of fibroblasts as it disrupts E2-TopBP1 interaction. siRNA targeting SIRT1 rescues E2-S23A stability in N/Tert-1 cells treated with J2 fibroblasts, with an increased E2-S23A acetylation. The results demonstrate that the E2-TopBP1 interaction is critical during the viral life cycle as it prevents fibroblast stimulated SIRT1 mediated deacetylation of E2 that promotes protein degradation. This means that the E2-TopBP1 complex maintains E2 and viral genome stability and that disruption of this complex can promote viral genome integration. Finally, we demonstrate that HPV11 E2 also interacts with TopBP1 and that this interaction is critical for HPV11 E2 stability in the presence of J2 cells. Treatment of N/Tert-1+11E2-WT cells with CX4945 results in 11E2 degradation. Therefore, CK2 inhibition is a therapeutic strategy for alleviating HPV11 diseases, including juvenile respiratory papillomatosis. ImportanceHuman papillomaviruses are pathogens that cause a host of diseases ranging from benign warts to cancers. There are no therapeutics available for combating these diseases that directly target viral proteins or processes, therefore we must enhance our understanding of HPV life cycles to assist with identifying novel treatments. In this report, we demonstrate that HPV16 and HPV11 E2 protein expression is dependent upon TopBP1 interaction in keratinocytes interacting with fibroblasts, which recapitulate stromal interactions in culture. The degradation of 16E2 promotes HPV16 genome integration, therefore the E2-TopBP1 interaction is critical during the viral life cycle. We demonstrate that the CK2 inhibitor CX4945 disrupts HPV11 interaction with TopBP1 and destabilizes HPV11 E2 protein in the presence of J2 fibroblasts; we propose that CX4945 could alleviate HPV11 disease burden.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Interaction with TopBP1 mediates human papillomavirus 16 E2 plasmid segregation/retention function and stability during the viral life cycle

Human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) E2 is a DNA binding protein that regulates transcription, replication and potentially, segregation of the HPV16 genome during the viral life cycle. In the segregation model, E2 simultaneously binds to viral and host chromatin, acting as a bridge to ensure that viral genomes reside in daughter nuclei following cell division. The host chromatin receptor for E2 mediating this function is unknown. Recently, we demonstrated that CK2 phosphorylation of E2 on serine 23 (S23) is required for interaction with TopBP1, and that this interaction promotes E2 and TopBP1 recruitment to mitotic chromatin. Here, we demonstrate that in U2OS and N/Tert-1 cells expressing wild type E2 and a non-TopBP1 binding mutant (S23A, serine 23 mutated to alanine), interaction with TopBP1 is essential for E2 recruitment of plasmids to mitotic chromatin. Using a novel quantitative segregation assay, we demonstrate that interaction with TopBP1 is required for E2 plasmid segregation. The interaction of E2 with TopBP1 promotes increased levels of E2 protein during mitosis in U2OS and N/Tert-1 cells, as well as in human foreskin keratinocytes immortalized by the HPV16 genome. Additionally, interaction with TopBP1 is required for expression of the E2 protein during the viral life cycle. Overall, our results demonstrate that E2 has plasmid segregation activity, and that the E2-TopBP1 interaction is essential for this E2 function and for E2 expression during the viral life cycle. ImportanceHPV16 causes 3-4% of all human cancers. During the viral life cycle, it is proposed that the viral genome is actively segregated into daughter nuclei, ensuring viral replication in the subsequent S phase. The E2 protein potentially bridges the viral and host genomes during mitosis to mediate segregation of the circular viral plasmid. Here, we demonstrate that E2 has the ability to mediate plasmid segregation, and that this function is dependent upon interaction with the host protein TopBP1. Additionally, we demonstrate that the E2-TopBP1 interaction promotes enhanced E2 expression during mitosis which likely promotes the plasmid segregation function of E2. Overall, our results present a mechanism of how HPV16 can segregate its viral genome during an active infection, a critical aspect of the viral life cycle.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2021

A critical role for E2-p53 interaction during the human papillomavirus 16 life cycle

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are causative agents in ano-genital and oral cancers; HPV16 is the most prevalent type detected in human cancers. The HPV16 E6 protein targets p53 for proteasomal degradation to facilitate proliferation of the HPV16 infected cell. However, in HPV16 immortalized cells E6 is predominantly spliced (E6*) and unable to degrade p53. Here we demonstrate that human foreskin keratinocytes immortalized by HPV16 (HFK+HPV16), and HPV16 positive oropharyngeal cancers, retain significant expression of p53. In addition, p53 levels can be increased in HPV16+ head and neck cancer cell lines following treatment with cisplatin. Introduction of full-length E6 into HFK+HPV16 resulted in attenuation of cellular growth (in hTERT immortalized HFK, E6 expression promoted enhanced proliferation). An understudied interaction is that between E2 and p53 and we investigated whether this was important for the viral life cycle. We generated mutant genomes with E2 unable to interact with p53 resulting in profound phenotypes in primary HFK. The mutant induced hyper-proliferation, but an ultimate arrest of cell growth; {beta}-galactosidase staining demonstrated increased senescence, and COMET assays showed increased DNA damage compared with HFK+HPV16 wild type cells. There was failure of the viral life cycle in organotypic rafts with the mutant HFK resulting in premature differentiation and reduced proliferation. The results indicate that the E2-p53 interaction is critical during the HPV16 life cycle, and that disruption of this interaction has anti-viral potential. We discuss potential mechanisms to explain these phenotypes. ImportanceHuman papillomaviruses are causative agents in around 5% of all cancers. There are currently no antivirals available to combat these infections and cancers, therefore it remains a priority to enhance our understanding of the HPV life cycle. Here we demonstrate that an interaction between the viral replication/transcription/segregation factor E2 and the tumor suppressor p53 is critical for the HPV16 life cycle. HPV16 immortalized cells retain significant expression of p53, and the critical role for the E2-p53 interaction demonstrates why this is the case. If the E2-p53 interaction is disrupted then HPV16 immortalized cells fail to proliferate, have enhanced DNA damage and senescence, and there is premature differentiation during the viral life cycle. Results suggest that targeting the E2-p53 interaction would have therapeutic benefits, potentially attenuating the spread of HPV16.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2021

CK2 phosphorylation of human papillomavirus 16 E2 on serine 23 promotes interaction with TopBP1 and is critical for E2 plasmid retention function

During the human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) life cycle, the E2 protein interacts with host factors to regulate viral transcription, replication and genome segregation/retention. Our understanding of host partner proteins and their roles in E2 functions remains incomplete. Here, we demonstrate that CK2 phosphorylation of E2 on serine 23 promotes interaction with TopBP1 in vitro and in vivo, and that E2 is phosphorylated on this residue during the HPV16 life cycle. We investigated the consequences of mutating serine 23 on E2 functions. E2-S23A activates and represses transcription identically to E2-WT (wild-type), and E2-S23A is as efficient as E2-WT in transient replication assays. However, E2-S23A has compromised interaction with mitotic chromatin when compared with E2-WT. In E2-WT cells, both E2 and TopBP1 levels increase during mitosis when compared with vector control cells. In E2-S23A cells, neither E2 nor TopBP1 levels increase during mitosis. We next tested whether this difference in E2-S23A levels during mitosis disrupts E2 plasmid retention function. We developed a novel plasmid retention assay and demonstrate that E2-S23A is deficient in plasmid retention when compared with E2-WT. siRNA targeted knockdown of TopBP1 abrogates E2-WT plasmid retention function. Introduction of the S23A mutation into the HPV16 genome resulted in delayed immortalization of human foreskin keratinocytes (HFK) and higher episomal viral genome copy number in resulting established HFK. Overall, our results demonstrate that CK2 phosphorylation of E2 on serine 23 promotes interaction with TopBP1, which is critical for E2 plasmid retention function and in HPV16 immortalization of keratinocytes. ImportanceHuman papillomaviruses are causative agents in around 5% of all cancers, with no specific anti-viral therapeutics available for treating infections or resultant cancers. In this report, we demonstrate that phosphorylation of HPV16 E2 by CK2 promotes formation of a complex formation with the cellular protein TopBP1 in vitro and in vivo. This complex results in stabilization of E2 during mitosis and mediates plasmid retention by E2. This function promotes the partitioning of viral genomes into the nuclei of daughter cells following mitosis. We demonstrate that CK2 phosphorylates E2 on serine 23 in vivo, and that CK2 inhibitors disrupt the E2-TopBP1 complex. Mutation of E2 serine 23 to alanine disrupts the HPV16 life cycle, demonstrating a critical function for this residue. Together, our results suggest that CK2 inhibitors may disrupt the E2-TopBP1 dependent HPV16 life cycle and potentially kill HPV16 positive cancers, which lays a molecular foundation to develop novel therapeutic approaches for combating HPV16 disease.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Human papillomavirus 16 E2 repression of TWIST1 transcription is a potential mediator of HPV16 cancer outcomes

Human papillomaviruses are causative agents in around 5% of all cancers, including cervical and oropharyngeal. A feature of HPV cancers is their better clinical outcome compared with non-HPV anatomical counterparts. In turn, the presence of E2 predicts a better clinical outcome in HPV positive cancers; the reason(s) for the better outcome of E2 positive patients is not fully understood. Previously, we demonstrated that HPV16 E2 regulates host gene transcription that is relevant to the HPV16 life cycle in N/Tert-1 cells. One of the genes repressed by E2 and the entire HPV16 genome in N/Tert-1 cells is TWIST1. Here we demonstrate that TWIST1 RNA levels are reduced in HPV positive versus negative head and neck cancer, and that E2 and HPV16 downregulate both TWIST1 RNA and protein in our N/Tert-1 model; E6/E7 cannot repress TWIST1. E2 represses the TWIST1 promoter in transient assays, and is localized to the TWIST1 promoter; E2 also induces repressive epigenetic changes on the TWIST1 promoter. TWIST1 is a master transcriptional regulator of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and a high level of TWIST1 is a prognostic marker indicative of poor cancer outcomes. We demonstrate that TWIST1 target genes are also downregulated in E2 positive N/Tert-1 cells, and that E2 promotes a failure in wound healing, a phenotype of low TWIST1 levels. We propose that the presence of E2 in HPV positive tumors leads to TWIST1 repression, and that this plays a role in the better clinical response of E2 positive HPV tumors. ImportanceHPV16 positive cancers have a better clinical outcome that their non-HPV anatomical counterparts. Furthermore, the presence of HPV16 E2 RNA predicts a better outcome for HPV16 positive tumors; the reasons for this are not known. Here we demonstrate that E2 represses expression of the TWIST1 gene; an elevated level of this gene is a marker of poor prognosis for a variety of cancers. We demonstrate that E2 directly binds to the TWIST1 promoter and actively represses transcription. TWIST1 is a master regulator promoting EMT and here we demonstrate that the presence of E2 reduces the ability of N/Tert-1 cells to wound heal. Overall, we propose that the E2 repression of TWIST1 may contribute to the better clinical outcome of E2 positive HPV16 positive tumors.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Estrogen attenuates the growth of human papillomavirus positive epithelial cells

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are small, double-stranded DNA viruses that are significant risk factors in the development of cancer, and HPV accounts for approximately 5% of all worldwide cancers. Recent studies using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) have demonstrated that elevated levels of estrogen receptor alpha (ER) are associated with improved survival in oropharyngeal cancers, and these elevated receptor levels were linked with human papillomavirus positive cancers (HPV+cancers). There has been a dramatic increase in HPV-related head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HPV+HNSCCs) over the last two decades and therapeutic options for this ongoing health crisis are a priority; currently there are no anti-viral therapeutics available for combating HPV+cancers. During our own TGCA studies on head and neck cancer we had also discovered the overexpression of ER in HPV+cancers. Here we demonstrate that 17{beta}-estradiol (estrogen) attenuates the growth/cell viability of HPV+cancers in vitro, but not HPV negative cancer cells. In addition, N/Tert-1 cells (foreskin keratinocytes immortalized with hTERT) containing HPV16 have elevated levels of ER and growth sensitivity following estrogen treatment when compared with parental N/Tert-1. Finally, we demonstrate that there are potentially two mechanisms contributing to the attenuation of HPV+ cell growth following estrogen treatment. First, estrogen represses the viral transcriptional long control region (LCR) downregulating early gene expression, including E6/E7. Second, expression of E6 and E7 by themselves sensitizes cells to estrogen. Overall our results support the recent proposal that estrogen could be exploited therapeutically for the treatment of HPV positive oral cancers. ImportanceHuman papillomaviruses cause around 5% of all human cancers, yet there are no specific anti-viral therapeutic approaches available for combating these cancers. These cancers are currently treated with standard chemo-radiation therapy (CRT). Specific anti-viral reagents are desperately required, particularly for HPV+HNSCC whose incidence is increasing and for which there are no diagnostic tools available for combating this disease. Using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) ourselves and others determined that the estrogen receptor (ER) is overexpressed in HPV+HNSCC, and that elevated levels are associated with an improved disease outcome. This has led to the proposal that estrogen treatment could be a novel therapeutic approach for combating HPV+cancers. Here we demonstrate that estrogen attenuates the growth of HPV+epithelial cells using multiple mechanisms, supporting the idea that estrogen has potential as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of HPV+HNSCC.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Human papillomavirus 16 E6 and E7 synergistically repress innate immune gene transcription

Human papillomaviruses are causative agents in 5% of all cancers, including the majority of anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. Downregulation of innate immune genes (IIGs) by HPV to promote the viral life cycle is well documented; E6 and E7 are known repressors of these genes. More recently we demonstrated that E2 could also repress IIGs. These studies have been carried out in cells over-expressing the viral proteins and to further investigate the role of individual viral proteins in this repression we introduced stop codons into E6 and/or E7 in the entire HPV16 genome and generated N/Tert-1 cells stably maintaining the HPV16 genomes. We demonstrate that E6 or E7 individually are not sufficient to repress IIG expression in the context of the entire HPV16 genome, both are required for a synergistic repression. The DNA damage response (DDR) is activated by HPV16 irrespective of E6 and E7 expression, presumably due to viral replication; E1 is a known activator of the DDR. In addition, replication stress was apparent in the HPV16 positive cells lacking E6 and E7, manifested by attenuated cellular growth and activation of replication stress genes. These studies lead us to the following model. Viral replication per se can activate the DDR following infection, and this activation is a known inducer of IIG expression which could induce cellular senescence. To combat this, E6 and E7 synergistically combine to manipulate the DDR and actively repress innate immune gene expression promoting cellular growth; neither protein by itself is able to do this. ImportanceThe role of HPV16 in human cancers is well established; however, to date there are no anti-viral therapeutics that are available for combatting these cancers. To identify such targets, we must enhance understanding of the viral life cycle. Innate immune genes (IIGs) are repressed by HPV16, and we have reported that this repression persists through to cancer. Reversal of this repression would boost the immune response to HPV16 positive tumors, an area that is becoming more important given the advances in immunotherapy. This report demonstrates that E6 and E7 synergistically repress IIG expression in the context of the entire HPV16 genome. Removal of either protein activates the expression of IIGs by HPV16. Therefore, gaining a precise understanding of how the viral oncogenes repress IIG expression represents an opportunity to reverse this repression and boost the immune response to HPV16 infections for therapeutic gain.

molecular biology↗