Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Brent, M. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Brent, M. R..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Ubiquitous functional synergy partially explains why most transcription factor binding is non-functional

Most genes in whose promotor a transcription factor (TF) binds do not change in expression when the concentration of the TF is perturbed. No existing model can predict which bound promotors will respond and which will not. We hypothesized that a genes response to perturbation of a TF bound in its promotor can depend on which other TFs are bound there, a phenomenon we call functional synergy. This is distinct from cooperative binding, which is already accounted for in the binding location data. To investigate functional synergy, we created a comprehensive dataset on TF binding locations in yeast using a method that is orthogonal to chromatin immunoprecipitation. We then used mathematical modeling to identify high-confidence instances of functional synergy. We found that such synergies are surprisingly common. Responses to perturbations of 44 different TFs were modified by the presence of other TFs. 48 TFs served as modifiers, but some modified responses to many TFs. We conclude that (1) measuring the binding locations of a single TF will not, in general, reveal which genes the TF regulates, and (2) traditional networks linking TFs to their targets must be made substantially more expressive, allowing some TFs to modify the effects of others.

genomics↗

Combining Motifs, CRE Activity, And Gene Expression Data Using ML Greatly Improves the Accuracy of Tissue-Specific TF Network Maps

MotivationReconstructing tissue-specific transcription factor (TF) networks remains challenging. TF motif-based methods often lack functional validation, while expression-based methods struggle to distinguish direct binding from indirect regulation. Integration of diverse data types is necessary to accurately prioritize functional targets directly bound by TFs across human tissues. ResultsWe introduce METANet, a supervised ensemble learning framework that combines TF motifs, cis-regulatory element activity, and linear and non-linear expression-derived features to predict TF binding. Applied to 36 human tissues, METANet significantly outperforms established methods in identifying direct, functional targets of TFs validated by ChIP-seq and gene ontology. Furthermore, METANet captures tissue-specific regulation comparable to existing methods, allowing the identification of reproducible gene-trait associations. Availability and ImplementationAll code and network maps are freely available at Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17309371. Contactbrent@wustl.edu.

systems biology↗

Mapping the transcriptional regulatory network of a fungal pathogen by exploiting transcription factor perturbation

Cryptococcus neoformans is a deadly fungal pathogen. Upon entering a mammalian host, it deploys a voluminous polysaccharide capsule that is necessary for it to survive host defenses and maintain an infection. Capsule expansion is regulated transcriptionally, as deletion of many transcription factors (TFs) alters capsule. Thus, we set out to map the transcriptional regulatory network of C. neoformans - that is, to identify the TFs that directly regulate each gene in the genome. First, we carried out RNA-seq of 120 single-TF-deletion strains, together with wild-type controls. We then applied NetProphet3, a TF network mapping algorithm, to predict the direct functional targets of each TF. Unexpectedly, analysis of this network indicated that there are no TFs that primarily regulate genes involved in capsule formation. Rather, the TFs that play a role in deploying capsule also regulate many other genes and processes. Comparison to a TF network map we built for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a distantly related model yeast, identified pairs of TFs that are functionally orthologous - that is, their targets are enriched for orthologous genes. In many cases, these pairs are different from the ones identified by sequence homology alone. We suggest that network analyses should be used to complement sequence comparison when searching for functionally orthologous transcription factors. Our network map can be searched and visualized at http://cryptococcus.net.

genomics↗

Construction of Multi-Modal Transcriptome-Small Molecule Interaction Networks from High-Throughput Measurements to Study Human Complex Traits

We present Gene-Embedded Multi-modal Networks (GEM-Net), a semi-supervised framework for constructing multi-modal networks centered on genes. GEM-Net uses gene-level modules and selectively incorporates heterogeneous omics profiles using a correlated meta-analysis strategy that accounts for scale imbalance, missingness, and intra-modular correlation. Prior to network inference, we developed a harmonized data processing protocol that adjusts each omic layer independently through a shared mathematical workflow involving transformation, dimensionality reduction, and regression-based covariate adjustment. GEM-Net modules were inferred and benchmarked against unsupervised methods using transcriptomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic data from the Long Life Family Study (LLFS), a unique cohort enriched for exceptional familial longevity and health. GEM-Net modules were more diverse and biologically interpretable, with stronger support from protein- protein interactions, transcriptional regulation, and metabolic annotations. Applying GEM-Net to metabolic health in LLFS revealed an axis between the microbiome-derived metabolite N-acetylglycine and immune genes (FCER1A, HDC, CPA3, MS4A2) associated with improved insulin sensitivity and reduced inflammation in healthy older individuals. GEM-Nets offer a reusable reference from a long-lived population and a generalizable framework for multi-omics discovery. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15003731.

systems biology↗

MAPPING TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NETWORKS BY COMPARING TF BINDING LOCATIONS TO TF PERTURBATION RESPONSES

BackgroundA transcription-factor (TF) network map indicates the direct, functional targets of each TF -- the genes it regulates by binding to their cis-regulatory DNA. Data on the genomic binding locations of each TF and the transcriptional responses to perturbations of its activity, such as overexpressing it, could support TF network mapping. Systematic data sets of both types exist for yeast and for human K562 and HEK293 cells.\n\nResultsIn previous data, most TF binding sites appear to be non-functional, so one cannot take the genes in whose promoters a TF binds as its direct, functional (DF) targets. Taking the genes that are both bound by a TF and responsive to a perturbation of it as its DF targets (intersection algorithm) is also not safe, as we show by deriving a new lower bound on the expected false discovery rate of the intersection algorithm. When there are many non-functional binding sites and many indirect targets, non-functional sites are expected to occur in the cis-regulatory DNA of indirect targets by chance. Dual threshold optimization, a new method for setting significance thresholds on binding and response data, improves the intersection algorithm, as does post-processing perturbation-response data with NetProphet 2.0. A comprehensive new data set measuring the transcriptional response shortly after inducing overexpression of a TF also helps, as does transposon calling cards, a new method for identifying TF binding locations.\n\nConclusionsThe combination of dual threshold optimization and NetProphet greatly expands the high-confidence TF network map in both yeast and human. In yeast, measuring the response shortly after inducing TF overexpression and measuring binding locations by using transposon calling cards improve the network synergistically.

genomics↗