Biology subjects

Brehelin, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Brehelin, L..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Accounting for ambiguity in ancestral sequence reconstruction

The reconstruction of ancestral genetic sequences from the analysis of contemporaneous data is a powerful tool to improve our understanding of molecular evolution. Various statistical criteria defined in a phylogenetic framework can be used to infer nucleotide, aminoa-cid or codon states at internal nodes of the tree, for every position along the sequence. These criteria generally select the state that maximises (or minimises) a given criterion. Although it is perfectly sensible from a statistical perspective, that strategy fails to convey useful information about the level of uncertainty associated to the inference. The present study introduces a new criterion for ancestral nucleotide reconstruction that selects a single state whenever the signal conveyed by the data is strong, and a combination of multiple states otherwise. Simulations demonstrate the benefit of this approach with a substantial increase in the accuracy of ancestral sequence reconstruction without significantly compromising on the precision of the solutions returned.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Modeling transcription factor combinatorics in promoters and enhancers

In eukaryotic cells, transcription factors (TFs) are thought to act in a combinatorial way, by competing and collaborating to regulate common target genes. However, several questions remain regarding the conservation of these combina-tions among different gene classes, regulatory regions and cell types. We propose a new approach named TFcoop to infer the TF combinations involved in the binding of a tar-get TF in a particular cell type. TFcoop aims to predict the binding sites of the target TF upon the binding affinity of all identified cooperating TFs. The set of cooperating TFs and model parameters are learned from ChIP-seq data of the target TF. We used TFcoop to investigate the TF combina-tions involved in the binding of 106 TFs on 41 cell types and in four regulatory regions: promoters of mRNAs, lncRNAs and pri-miRNAs, and enhancers. We first assess that TFcoop is accurate and outperforms simple PWM methods for pre-dicting TF binding sites. Next, analysis of the learned models sheds light on important properties of TF combinations in different promoter classes and in enhancers. First, we show that combinations governing TF binding on enhancers are more cell-type specific than that governing binding in pro-moters. Second, for a given TF and cell type, we observe that TF combinations are different between promoters and en-hancers, but similar for promoters of mRNAs, lncRNAs and pri-miRNAs. Analysis of the TFs cooperating with the dif-ferent targets show over-representation of pioneer TFs and a clear preference for TFs with binding motif composition similar to that of the target. Lastly, our models accurately dis-tinguish promoters associated with specific biological processes.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Gene nucleotide composition accurately predicts expression and is linked to topological chromatin domains

Gene expression is orchestrated by distinct regulatory regions (e.g. promoters, enhancers, UTRs) to ensure a wide variety of cell types and functions. A challenge is to identify which regulatory regions are active, what are their associated features and how they work together in each cell type. Several approaches have tackled this problem by modeling gene expression based on epigenetic marks (e.g. ChIP-seq, methylation, DNase hypersensitivity), with the ultimate goal of identifying driving genomic regions and mutations that are clinically relevant in particular in precision medicine. However, these models rely on experimental data, which are limited to specific samples (even often to cell lines) and cannot be generated for all regulators and all patients. In addition, we show here that, although these approaches are accurate in predicting gene expression, their biological interpretation can be misleading. Finally these methods are not designed to capture potential regulation instructions present at the sequence level, before the binding of regulators or the opening of the chromatin. We develop here a method for predicting mRNA levels based solely on sequence features collected from distinct regulatory regions, which is as accurate as methods based on experimental data. Our approach confirms the importance of nucleotide composition in predicting gene expression and ranks regulatory regions according to their contribution. It also unveils strong influence of gene body sequence, in particular introns. We further provide evidence that the contribution of nucleotide content can be linked to co-regulations associated with genome 3D architecture and to associations of genes within topologically associated domains.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Improving pairwise comparison of protein sequences with domain co-occurrence

MotivationComparing and aligning protein sequences is an essential task in bioinformatics. More specifically, local alignment tools like BLAST are widely used for identifying conserved protein sub-sequences, which likely correspond to protein domains or functional motifs. However, to limit the number of false positives, these tools are used with stringent sequence-similarity thresholds and hence can miss several hits, especially for species that are phylogenetically distant from reference organisms. A solution to this problem is then to integrate additional contextual information to the procedure.\n\nResultsHere, we propose to use domain co-occurrence to increase the sensitivity of pairwise sequence comparisons. Domain co-occurrence is a strong feature of proteins, since most protein domains tend to appear with a limited number of other domains on the same protein. We propose a method to take this information into account in a typical BLAST analysis and to construct new domain families on the basis of these results. We used Plasmodium falciparum as a case study to evaluate our method. The experimental findings showed an increase of 16% of the number of significant BLAST hits and an increase of 28% of the proteome area that can be covered with a domain. Our method identified 2473 new domains for which, in most cases, no model of the Pfam database could be linked. Moreover, our study of the quality of the new domains in terms of alignment and physicochemical properties show that they are close to that of standard Pfam domains.\n\nAvailabilitySoftware implementing the proposed approach and the Supplementary Data are available at: https://gite.lirmm.fr/menichelli/pairwise-comparison-with-cooccurrence

bioinformatics↗