Biology subjects

Bravo Nunez, M. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Bravo Nunez, M. A..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Pericentromeric repeat copy number tunes heterochromatin dosage to control chromosome segregation and gene expression in fission yeast

Centromeres are essential for chromosome segregation, yet in many genomes they are composed entirely of rapidly evolving repetitive DNA, embedded in other repetitive DNA that forms pericentromeric heterochromatin. Due to the difficulties of manipulating these repeat-rich regions, how the relative size of pericentromeric repeat regions influences chromosome segregation remains an open question. Here, we take advantage of the tractable Schizosaccharomyces pombe system by combining population-level analysis, complete long-read assemblies, and engineered near-isogenic strains to test how pericentromeric repeat copy number affects chromosome biology in its native context. We find that pericentromeric dh/dg arrays on chromosome 3 vary almost tenfold in size among natural S. pombe isolates, ranging from 35 to 265 kb. We converted this natural diversity into an experimental system of nearly isogenic strains that primarily differ in pericentromere size (35 to >350 kb). We found that pericentromere size does not alter baseline growth under standard conditions. However, larger pericentromeres alter transcriptional output and sensitize cells to spindle stress. We show that this spindle-stress phenotype depends on heterochromatin: loss of the H3K9 methyltransferase Clr4 abolishes size-dependent differences, whereas artificial targeting of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex to heterochromatin partially rescues the defect. Thus, we find that larger pericentromeres act as sinks for limiting regulatory factors, weakening their effective concentration at centromeres and compromising faithful chromosome segregation under stress. These results establish that naturally occurring copy-number variation within repetitive pericentromeric DNA is not merely noise, but a functional source of variation in chromosome segregation and gene regulation. Our work provides an experimentally tractable framework for understanding how repeat expansion in centromere-proximal heterochromatin influences chromosome behavior across eukaryotes.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2021

S. pombe wtf genes use dual transcriptional regulation and selective protein exclusion from spores to cause meiotic drive

Meiotic drivers bias gametogenesis to ensure their transmission into more than half the offspring of a heterozygote. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, wtf meiotic drivers destroy the meiotic products (spores) that do not inherit the driver from a heterozygote, thereby reducing fertility. wtf drivers encode both a Wtfpoison protein and a Wtfantidote protein using alternative transcriptional start sites. Here, we analyze how the expression and localization of the Wtf proteins are regulated to achieve drive. We show that transcriptional timing and selective protein exclusion from developing spores ensure that all spores are exposed to Wtf4poison, but only the spores that inherit wtf4 receive a dose of Wtf4antidote sufficient for survival. In addition, we show that the Mei4 transcription factor, a master regulator of meiosis, controls the expression of the wtf4poison transcript. This dual transcriptional regulation, which includes the use of a critical meiotic transcription factor, likely complicates the universal suppression of wtf genes without concomitantly disrupting spore viability. We propose that these features contribute to the evolutionary success of the wtf drivers. Author SummaryKiller meiotic drivers are one type of selfish DNA sequence. When only one copy of a killer meiotic driver is found in a genome, the driver is expected to be transmitted to only half of the gametes (e.g. eggs or sperm). Killer meiotic drivers, however, kill developing gametes that do not inherit them, giving the driver a transmission advantage into the next generation. The molecular mechanisms used by these killers are not well understood. In this work, we analyzed how one killer meiotic driver, wtf4 from fission yeast, ensures targeted gamete (spore) killing. Previous work showed that wtf meiotic drivers encode a poison protein that is transmitted to all spores and an antidote protein that rescues only spores that inherit the locus. Here, we show that different timing of the expression of the two proteins, combined with differential inclusion of the proteins in developing spores, both contribute to targeted spore killing. We also demonstrate that wtf4 exploits an essential gene expression pathway, making it difficult for the genome to prevent this locus from being expressed and killing. This extends our knowledge both of how these genetic parasites act and how they are equipped to evade host suppression mechanisms.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2020

Atypical meiosis can be adaptive in outcrossed S. pombe due to wtf meiotic drivers

Killer meiotic drivers are genetic parasites that destroy sibling gametes lacking the driver allele. The fitness costs of drive can lead to selection of unlinked suppressors. This suppression could involve evolutionary tradeoffs that compromise gametogenesis and contribute to infertility. Schizosaccharomyces pombe, an organism containing numerous gamete-killing wtf drivers, offers a tractable system to test this hypothesis. Here, we demonstrate that in scenarios analogous to outcrossing, wtf drivers generate a fitness landscape in which atypical gametes, such as aneuploids and diploids, are advantageous. In this context, wtf drivers can decrease the fitness cost of mutations that disrupt meiotic fidelity and, in some circumstances, can even make such mutations beneficial. Moreover, we find that S. pombe isolates vary greatly in their ability to make haploid gametes, with some isolates generating more than 25% aneuploid or diploid gametes. This work empirically demonstrates the potential for meiotic drivers to shape the evolution of gametogenesis.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2020

The wtf4 meiotic driver utilizes controlled protein aggregation to generate selective cell death

Meiotic drivers are parasitic loci that force their own transmission into greater than half of the offspring of a heterozygote. Many drivers have been identified, but their molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. The wtf4 gene is a meiotic driver in Schizosaccharomyces pombe that uses a poison-antidote mechanism. Here, we show that the Wtf4 proteins can function outside of gametogenesis and in a distantly related species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Wtf4poison protein forms dispersed, toxic aggregates. The similar Wtf4antidote protein also forms aggregates but is sequestered within or near vacuoles and is mostly benign. The Wtf4antidote can co-assemble with the Wtf4poison and promote its trafficking to vacuoles. We show that neutralization of the Wtf4poison requires both co-assembly with the Wtf4antidote and aggregate sequestration, as mutations that disrupt either of these processes results in cell death. This work reveals that wtf parasites can exploit protein aggregate management pathways to selectively destroy gametes.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Dramatically diverse S. pombe wtf meiotic drivers all display high gamete-killing efficiency

Meiotic drivers are selfish genetic loci that force their transmission into more than 50% of the viable gametes made by heterozygotes. Meiotic drivers are known to cause infertility in a diverse range of eukaryotes and are predicted to affect the evolution of genome structure and meiosis. The wtf gene family of Schizosaccharomyces pombe includes both meiotic drivers and drive suppressors and thus offers a tractable model organism to study drive systems. Currently, only a handful of wtf genes have been functionally characterized and those genes only partially reflect the diversity of the wtf gene family. In this work, we functionally test 22 additional wtf genes. We identify eight new drivers that share between 30-90% amino acid identity with previously characterized drivers. Despite the vast divergence between these genes, they generally drive into >85% gametes when heterozygous. We also find three new wtf genes that suppress drive, including two that also act as autonomous drivers. Additionally, we find that wtf genes do not underlie a weak (64%) transmission bias caused by a locus or loci on chromosome 1. Finally, we find that some Wtf proteins have expression or localization patterns that are distinct from the poison and antidote proteins encoded by drivers and suppressors, suggesting some wtf genes may have non-meiotic drive functions. Overall, this work expands our understanding of the wtf gene family and the burden selfish driver genes impose on S. pombe.\n\nArticle SummaryDuring gametogenesis, the two gene copies at a given locus, known as alleles, are each transmitted to 50% of the gametes (e.g. sperm). However, some alleles cheat so that they are found in more than the expected 50% of gametes, often at the expense of fertility. This selfish behavior is known as meiotic drive. Some members of the wtf gene family in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, kill the gametes (spores) that do not inherit them, resulting in meiotic drive favoring the wtf allele. Other wtf genes act as suppressors of drive. However, the wtf gene family is diverse and only a small subset of the genes has been characterized. Here we analyze the functions of other members of this gene family and found eight new drivers as well as three new suppressors of drive. Surprisingly, we find that drive is relatively insensitive to changes in wtf gene sequence as highly diverged wtf genes execute gamete killing with similar efficiency. Finally, we also find that the expression and localization of some Wtf proteins are distinct from those of known drivers and suppressors, suggesting that these proteins may have non-meiotic drive functions.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Bacteria-to-human protein networks reveal origins of endogenous DNA damage

DNA damage provokes mutations and cancer, and results from external carcinogens or endogenous cellular processes. Yet, the intrinsic instigators of DNA damage are poorly understood. Here we identify proteins that promote endogenous DNA damage when overproduced: the DNA-damaging proteins (DDPs). We discover a large network of DDPs in Escherichia coli and deconvolute them into six DNA-damage-causing function clusters, demonstrating DDP mechanisms in three: reactive-oxygen increase by transmembrane transporters, chromosome loss by replisome binding, and replication stalling by transcription factors. Their 284 human homologs are over-represented among known cancer drivers, and their expression in tumors predicts heavy mutagenesis and poor prognosis. Half of tested human homologs, when overproduced in human cells, promote DNA damage and mutation, with DNA-damaging mechanisms like those in E. coli. Together, our work reveals DDP networks that provoke endogenous DNA damage and may indicate functions of many human known and newly implicated cancer-promoting proteins.

cancer biology↗