Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Brantschen, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Brantschen, J..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Globally unified analysis of riverine eDNA reveals common associations of fish biodiversity with drainage characteristics

Freshwater biodiversity is declining at a pace that outstrips the capacity of existing monitoring approaches both in temporal and spatial dimensions, highlighting the urgent need for rapid and scalable assessment and attribution of biodiversity states and changes. Here, we present one of the first global assessments and unified analyses of riverine fish biodiversity using environmental DNA (eDNA) collected from 1818 sites across 113 river systems. We quantified species richness, functional redundancy, phylogenetic diversity, and genetic sequence diversity, and related them to drainage characteristics. Our results showed that eDNA effectively captured global patterns of multi-faceted riverine fish biodiversity and disentangled the roles of climate and human activities in shaping biodiversity-area relationships. Catchments in warmer climates consistently enhanced biodiversity accumulation with area, while higher human activity intensity weakened this scaling. Species richness, functional, and genetic sequence diversity exhibited stronger negative responses to human activities in larger catchments. In contrast, phylogenetic diversity showed the strongest negative effects in smaller catchments with these impacts diminishing as catchment area increased, highlighting the facet-dependent nature of biodiversity responses to environmental gradients. Our findings demonstrate the power of eDNA-based datasets for harmonized, multi-faceted biodiversity assessments, offering a scalable approach for detecting and attributing biodiversity change and informing conservation strategies under accelerating global change.

ecology↗

Integrated reanalysis of global riverine fish eDNA datasets shows robustness and congruence of biodiversity conclusions

The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) has revolutionized biodiversity assessments in aquatic ecosystems, enabling non-invasive monitoring of fish communities across diverse regions. However, the global comparability of these eDNA datasets remains ambiguous due heterogeneous sampling protocols and bioinformatic workflows across studies, particularly regarding the robustness of their conclusions on biodiversity assessments. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of 58 riverine fish eDNA metabarcoding datasets, covering 1,818 sampling sites worldwide, to evaluate the robustness of eDNA-derived biodiversity patterns. We found that species richness estimates and metrics of community structure derived under a common bioinformatic workflow were overall consistent with those of original analyses, despite the relatively high variability in bioinformatic analyses in the respective original studies. Contrastingly, congruence of species identity varied more extensively across datasets, mostly reflecting different completeness and regional relevance of reference databases. Restricting taxonomic assignment to basin-specific species pools improved species identification accuracy, while datasets lacking publicly accessible or well-curated reference data were more prone to mismatches. Year of sampling had a positive effect on taxonomic congruence, such that more recent studies showed increased robustness, also reflecting improved reference database coverage and enhanced species-level identification over time and overall method congruence in more recent years. Overall, the suitability and potential of eDNA for global biodiversity monitoring is corroborating overall robust biodiversity estimates, irrespective of the bioinformatic approaches. Our study underlines the effectiveness and need of further harmonization of bioinformatic workflows and strengthened region-specific reference databases for improved taxonomic resolution and comparability across studies.

ecology↗

Terrestrial land cover shapes fish diversity in major subtropical rivers

Freshwater biodiversity is critically affected by human modifications of terrestrial land use and land cover (LULC)1,2. Yet, knowledge of the spatial extent and magnitude of LULC-aquatic biodiversity linkages is still surprisingly limited, impeding the implementation of optimal management strategies3. Here, we compiled fish diversity data across a 160,000-km2 subtropical river catchment in Thailand characterized by exceptional biodiversity4 yet intense anthropogenic alterations5, and attributed fish species richness and community composition to contemporary terrestrial LULC across the catchment. We estimated a spatial range of LULC effects extending up to about 20 km upstream from sampling sites, and explained nearly 60 % of the variance in the observed species richness, associated with major LULC categories including croplands, forest, and urban areas. We find that integrating both spatial range and magnitudes of LULC effects is needed to accurately predict fish species richness. Further, projected LULC changes showcase future gains and losses of fish species richness across the river network and offer a scalable basis for riverine biodiversity conservation and land management, allowing for potential mitigation of biodiversity loss in highly diverse yet data-deficient tropical to sub-tropical riverine habitats.

ecology↗

Meta-analysis shows both congruence and complementarity of DNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological community assessment

Assessment of the diversity and composition of biological communities is central to studies in ecology as well as for ecological monitoring. Historically, individual taxonomic groups have been assessed separately, while for an understanding of the state and change of biodiversity under ongoing global change an integrated assessment would be necessary. DNA metabarcoding has been proposed to be a highly promising approach especially for the assessment of aquatic communities, and numerous studies have investigated the consistency of this new technique with traditional morpho-taxonomic approaches. These individual studies have used DNA metabarcoding to assess diversity and community structure of aquatic organisms both in marine and freshwater systems globally over the last decade. However, a systematic analysis of the comparability and effectiveness of DNA-based community assessment across all of these studies has hitherto been lacking. Here we performed the first meta-analysis of all available studies comparing traditional methods and DNA metabarcoding to measure and assess biological diversity of key aquatic groups, including microorganisms, macroinvertebrates, and fish. Across 215 datasets, we found that DNA metabarcoding provides diversity estimates (richness) that are globally consistent to those obtained using traditional methods. DNA metabarcoding also generates species inventories that are highly congruent with traditional methods for fish. Contrastingly, however, species inventories of microorganisms and macroinvertebrates obtained by DNA metabarcoding showed pronounced differences to traditional methods, missing some taxa but at the same time detecting otherwise overseen diversity. Our results indicate that DNA metabarcoding is efficient to estimate local and regional richness. The method is generally sufficiently advanced to study the composition of fish communities and replace more invasive traditional methods. For smaller organisms, like macroinvertebrates and microorganisms, DNA metabarcoding may continue to give complementary rather than identical estimates compared to traditional approaches. Systematic and comparable data collection will increase the understanding of different aspects of this complementarity, and increase the effectiveness of the method and adequate interpretation of the results.

ecology↗