Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Brandt, E. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Brandt, E. E..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Takeoff dynamics are stereotyped across jumping spiders

Jumping is a challenging locomotive mode, requiring rapid force generation and precise coordination of multiple limbs. Many animals meet this challenge using elastic mechanisms that store and rapidly release energy. Jumping spiders (Salticidae), however, rely on a semi-hydraulic system that constrains how their legs can generate propulsion. Much about how these spiders reliably generate jumps within these mechanical constraints remains unknown. Here, we analyze 46 individuals spanning 14 genera and significant morphological diversity and show that this physically constrained system is coupled to a remarkably stereotyped coordination strategy. Whole-body kinematics and novel graph-based analyses of inter-limb coordination reveal a stereotyped two-stage takeoff sequence: a "swing" driven by extension of the fourth legs, followed by a rapid "fling" by the third legs that generates propulsion for takeoff. We further demonstrate that this pattern is preserved beyond Amazonian species, persisting in salticids from North America and Australia. Our results suggest that physical and biomechanical constraints may canalize locomotor evolution toward a common dynamical solution.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Urbanization effects are trait-specific and city-dependent across a widespread spider's global range

Urban environments impose strong selective pressures through biotic and abiotic factors, driving changes in behavior, physiology, and morphology. Yet, responses vary across taxa and cities, and it remains unclear which traits respond consistently and what factors moderate this variation. We addressed these questions using the widespread European garden spider (Araneus diadematus) as a model, measuring size, color, and web-building traits along urban-rural transects in 22 cities across its distribution range. Using a meta-analytic framework, we assessed how city-specific characteristics influenced trait variation. Urbanization consistently reduced relative abdomen surface area, a proxy for body condition. Exploratory meta-regressions suggest that web-building response was predicted by temperature: compared to their non-urban surroundings, urban webs are larger in colder regions and smaller in warmer regions. In contrast, body size and abdomen brightness varied among cities without clear environmental predictors. These findings show that urbanization effects are trait- and context-dependent, likely influenced by local factors such as heat island intensity, microclimate, or prey availability. Linking within- and between-city variation will improve understanding of species phenotypic responses to urban environments.

ecology↗

Exploring efficiency landscapes in the acoustic-morphospace of crickets reveals two alternative calling strategies

Male crickets attract females by producing calls with their forewings. Louder calls travel further and are more effective at attracting mates. However, crickets are much smaller than the wavelength of their call, and this limits their power output. A small group called tree crickets make acoustic tools called baffles which reduce acoustic short-circuiting, a source of dipole inefficiency. Here, we ask why baffling is uncommon among crickets. We hypothesize that baffling may be rare, because like other tools they offer insufficient advantage for most species. To test this, we modelled the calling efficiencies of crickets within the full space of possible natural wing sizes and call frequencies, in multiple acoustic environments. We then generated efficiency landscapes, within which we plotted 112 cricket species across 7 phylogenetic clades. We found that all sampled crickets, in all conditions, could gain efficiency from tool use. Surprisingly, we also found that calling from the ground significantly increased efficiency, with or without a baffle, by as much as an order of magnitude. We found that the ground provides some reduction of acoustic short-circuiting but also halves the air volume within which sound is radiated. It simultaneously reflects sound upwards, allowing recapture of a significant amount of acoustic energy through constructive interference. Thus, using the ground as a reflective baffle is an effective strategy for increasing calling efficiency. Indeed, theory suggests that this increase in efficiency is accessible not just to crickets, but to all acoustically communicating animals whether they are dipole or monopole sound sources. Significance StatementLoudness is a crucial feature in acoustic communication. Animals attracting mates or warding off predators are expected to make themselves as loud as possible. Two long-standing, seemingly unrelated unsolved problems regarding loudness in the field of animal communication are: the rarity of acoustic tool use, and animals that call from reflective ground-like surfaces, known to be an impediment to sound propagation. These two ideas are related; by refocusing analysis from sound propagation to sound radiation, we show that the ground is not an impediment, but rather an acoustic aid that can boost loudness more than tool use. We also show that calling from a reflective surface is an alternative strategy to maximize call loudness that is available to all animals.

biophysics↗