Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Brahma, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Brahma, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

MCWs (MiCroWire sorter): A new framework for automated and reliable spike sorting in human intracerebral recordings.

Efficient and accurate spike sorting is critical for isolating single neurons from extracellular recordings to distinguish neural activity of interest. However, while the electrodes and acquisition systems for non-human electrophysiology have been enhanced over the past decades to enable higher-yield single-neuron detections, those advances have not been translated into human electrophysiology. Single-wire electrodes are still ubiquitously used, and although acquisition systems have augmented their signal-to-noise ratio over the last 15 years, we are still limited by their low electrode count. Moreover, unlike non-human recordings, human recordings often take place in hospitals where different noise sources and subject breaks can compromise the recording quality during experimental sessions. To bridge this gap, this work presents an automatic, open-source spike sorting pipeline that leverages contemporary computational capabilities and is tailored to single-neuron recordings from humans acquired via microwires. The pipeline is implemented in both MATLAB and Python, ensuring accessibility and compatibility across computational environments. Its modular and comprehensive structure supports customization and even opportunities for new developments as per the requirements of the user and the application. One feature is a data-driven automatic module to remove narrow-band interference, besides electrical line noise, which can be an essential tool while recording in clinical settings, particularly for online processing implementations. Following spike detection, the pipeline implements an artifact rejection module that separates waveforms that are unlikely to be associated with actual spikes. Additionally, we introduce a configurable feature-extraction, clustering, and benchmarking framework that not only allows flexibility in employing user-defined or conventional algorithms, such as wavelet transform with superparamagnetic clustering, but can also evaluate multi-method agreement among the different sorters. The pipeline also utilizes established and novel quality metrics to support semiautomatic curation of isolated clusters. Furthermore, we can integrate the customized pipeline with experimental tasks by removing task-unrelated waveforms (e.g., during a break in a task) and prevent over-clustering with the aid of metrics for comparing response profiles. Thus, the presented pipeline addresses the three-pronged objectives of algorithm-adaptability, rigorous validation, and human single-neuron recording optimization to support clinical and cognitive neuroscience applications.

neuroscience↗

On the need of individually optimizing temporal interference stimulation of human brains due to inter-individual variability

IntroductionTranscranial temporal interference stimulation (TI, TIS, or tTIS), also known as interferential stimulation (IFS), is able to focally stimulate deep brain regions, provided it is properly optimized. We previously presented an algorithm for optimizing TI using two arrays of electrodes and showed that it can achieve more focal stimulation compared to optimized high-definition transcranial electrical stimulation (HD-TES) and conventional optimized TI using two pairs of electrodes, especially in the deep brain areas such as the hippocampus. However, those modeling studies were only performed on an averaged head (MNI152 template) and three individual heads without exploring inter-individual variability. Existing TI works in the literature mostly utilize a common (possibly optimized) montage of two pairs of electrodes on different individual heads without considering inter-individual variability. Material and methodHere we aim to study the inter-individual variability of optimized TI by applying the same optimization algorithms on N = 25 heads using their individualized head models. Specifically, we compared the focality achieved by different stimulation techniques at six different regions of interest (ROI; right hippocampus, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, left motor cortex, right amygdala, right caudate, and left thalamus) under both individually optimized and unoptimized montages. We also conducted numerical sensitivity analysis on the individual optimization and performed phantom recordings to test our models. ResultsAs expected, there is a variability in focality achieved by TI of up to 1.2 cm at the same ROI across subjects due to inter-individual differences in the head anatomy and tissue conductivity. We show that optimized TI using two arrays of electrodes achieves higher focality than that from optimized HD-TES at the same level of modulation intensity at 5 of the 6 ROIs. Compared to using a common montage either optimized from the MNI152 template or from the literature, individually optimized TI using two pairs of electrodes improves the focality by up to 4.4 cm, and by up to 1.1 cm if using two arrays of electrodes. Focality achieved by the individual optimization is sensitive to random changes and can vary up to 9.3 cm due to the non-lienarity of TI physics. Experimental recordings on a head phantom confirms the drop in TI stimulation strength when using unoptimized montages as predicted by our in silico models. ConclusionThis work demonstrates the need of individually optimizing TI to target deep brain areas, and advocates against using a common head model and montage for TI modeling and experimental studies.

biophysics↗