Biology subjects

Braga-Neto, U.

Publications and source records attributed to Braga-Neto, U..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

Hypothetical Human Immune Genome Complex Gradient May Help To Explain The Congenital Zika Symdrome Catastrophe In Brazil: A New Theory

There are few data considering human genetics as an important risk factor for birth abnormalities related to ZIKV infection during pregnancy, even though sub-Saharan African populations are apparently more resistant to CZS as compared to populations in the Americas. We hypothesized that single nucleotide variants (SNVs), especially in innate immune genes, could make some populations more susceptible to Zika congenital complications than others. Differences in the SNV frequencies among continental populations provide great potential for Machine Learning techniques. We explored a key immune genomic gradient between individuals from Africa, Asia and Latin America, working with complex signatures, using 297 SNVs. We employed a two-step approach. In the first step, decision trees (DTs) were used to extract the most discriminating SNVs among populations. In the second step, machine learning algorithms were used to evaluate the quality of the SNV pool identified in step one for discriminating between individuals from sub-Saharan African and Latin-American populations. Our results suggest that 10 SNVs from 10 genes (CLEC4M, CD58, OAS2, CD80, VEPH1, CTLA4, CD274, CD209, PLAAT4, CREB3L1) were able to discriminate sub-Saharan Africans from Latin American populations using only immune genome data, with an accuracy close to 100%. Moreover, we found that these SNVs form a genome gradient across the three main continental populations. These SNVs are important elements of the innate immune system and in the response against viruses. Our data support the Human Immune Genome Complex Gradient hypothesis as a new theory that may help to explain the CZS catastrophe in Brazil.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2020

PALLAS: Penalized mAximum LikeLihood and pArticle Swarms for inference of gene regulatory networks from time series data

We present PALLAS, a practical method for gene regulatory network (GRN) inference from time series data, which employs penalized maximum likelihood and particle swarms for optimization. PALLAS is based on the Partially-Observable Boolean Dynamical System (POBDS) model and thus does not require ad-hoc binarization of the data. The penalty in the likelihood is a LASSO regularization term, which encourages the resulting network to be sparse. PALLAS is able to scale to large networks under no prior knowledge, by virtue of a novel continuous-discrete Fish School Search particle swarm algorithm for efficient simultaneous maximization of the penalized likelihood over the discrete space of networks and the continuous space of observational parameters. The performance of PALLAS is demonstrated by a comprehensive set of experiments using synthetic data generated from real and artificial networks, as well as real time series microarray and RNA-seq data, where it is compared to several other well-known methods for gene regulatory network inference. The results show that PALLAS can infer GRNs efficiently and accurately. PALLAS is a fully-fledged program with a commandline user interface, written in python, and available on GitHub (https://github.com/yukuntan92/PALLAS).

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Unbiased Precision Estimation under Separate Sampling

MotivationPrecision and recall have become very popular classification accuracy metrics in the statistical learning literature. These metrics are ordinarily defined under the assumption that the data are sampled randomly from the mixture of the populations. However, observational case-control studies for biomarker discovery often collect data that are sampled separately from the case and control populations, particularly in the case of rare diseases. This discrepancy may introduce severe bias in classifier accuracy estimation.\n\nResultsWe demonstrate, using both analytical and numerical methods, that classifier precision estimates can display strong bias under separating sampling, with the bias magnitude depending on the difference between the case prevalences in the data and in the actual population. We show that this bias is systematic in the sense that it cannot be reduced by increasing sample size. If information about the true case prevalence is available from public health records, then a modified precision estimator is proposed that displays smaller bias, which can in fact be reduced to zero as sample size increases under regularity conditions on the classification algorithm. The accuracy of the theoretical analysis and the performance of the proposed precision estimator under separate sampling are investigated using synthetic and real data from observational case-control studies. The results confirmed that the proposed precision estimator indeed becomes unbiased as sample size increases, while the ordinary precision estimator may display large bias, particularly in the case of rare diseases.\n\nAvailabilityExtra plots are available as Supplementary Materials.\n\nAuthor summaryBiomedical data are often sampled separately from the case and control populations, particularly in the case of rare diseases. Precision is a popular classification accuracy metric in the statistical learning literature, which implicitly assumes that the data are sampled randomly from the mixture of the populations. In this paper we study the bias of precision under separate sampling using theoretical and numerical methods. We also propose a precision estimator for separate sampling in the case when the prevalence is known from public health records. The results confirmed that the proposed precision estimator becomes unbiased as sample size increases, while the ordinary precision estimator may display large bias, particularly in the case of rare diseases. In the absence of any knowledge about disease prevalence, precision estimates should be avoided under separate sampling.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Bayesian Classification of Microbial Communities Based on 16S rRNA Metagenomic Data

We propose a Bayesian method for the classification of 16S rRNA metagenomic profiles of bacterial abundance, by introducing a Poisson-Dirichlet-Multinomial hierarchical model for the sequencing data, constructing a prior distribution from sample data, calculating the posterior distribution in closed form; and deriving an Optimal Bayesian Classifier (OBC). The proposed algorithm is compared to state-of-the-art classification methods for 16S rRNA metagenomic data, including Random Forests and the phylogeny-based Metaphyl algorithm, for varying sample size, classification difficulty, and dimensionality (number of OTUs), using both synthetic and real metagenomic data sets. The results demonstrate that the proposed OBC method, with either noninformative or constructed priors, is competitive or superior to the other methods. In particular, in the case where the ratio of sample size to dimensionality is small, it was observed that the proposed method can vastly outperform the others.\n\nAuthor summaryRecent studies have highlighted the interplay between host genetics, gut microbes, and colorectal tumor initiation/progression. The characterization of microbial communities using metagenomic profiling has therefore received renewed interest. In this paper, we propose a method for classification, i.e., prediction of different outcomes, based on 16S rRNA metagenomic data. The proposed method employs a Bayesian approach, which is suitable for data sets with small ration of number of available instances to the dimensionality. Results using both synthetic and real metagenomic data show that the proposed method can outperform other state-of-the-art metagenomic classification algorithms.

bioinformatics↗