Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bowman, R. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Bowman, R. L..

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Single cell mutational profiling delineates clonal trajectories in myeloid malignancies

Myeloid malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), arise from the proliferation and expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells which acquire somatic mutations. Bulk molecular profiling studies on patient samples have suggested that somatic mutations are obtained in a step-wise fashion, where mutant genes with high variant allele frequencies (VAFs) are proposed to occur early in disease development and mutations with lower VAFs are thought to be acquired later in disease progression1-3. Although bulk sequencing informs leukemia biology and prognostication, it cannot distinguish which mutations occur in the same clone(s), accurately measure clonal complexity and clone size, or offer definitive evidence of mutational order. To elucidate the clonal framework of myeloid malignancies, we performed single cell mutational profiling on 146 samples from 123 patients. We found AML is most commonly comprised of a small number of dominant clones, which in many cases harbor co-occurring mutations in epigenetic regulators. Conversely, mutations in signaling genes often occur more than once in distinct subclones consistent with increasing clonal diversity. We also used these data to map the clonal trajectory of each patient and found that specific mutation combinations (FLT3-ITD + NPM1c) synergize to promote clonal expansion and dominance. We combined cell surface protein expression with single cell mutational analysis to map somatic genotype and clonal architecture with immunophenotype. Our studies of clonal architecture at a single cell level provide novel insights into the pathogenesis of myeloid transformation and how clonal complexity contributes to disease progression.

cancer biology↗

UVA and UVB elicit distinct mutational signatures in melanoma

BRAF-mutant melanomas are more likely than NRAS-mutant melanomas to arise in anatomical locations protected from chronic sun damage. We hypothesized that this discrepancy in tumor location is a consequence of the differential sensitivity of BRAF and NRAS-mutant melanocytes to ultraviolet light (UV)-mediated carcinogenesis. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the mutagenic consequences of a single, narrow band ultraviolet-A (UVA; 320-400nm) or ultraviolet-B (UVB; 280-320nm) exposure in mouse models predisposed to Braf- or Nras-mutant melanoma. Exposures approximated the amount of UVA or UVB energy contained in ~40 minutes of summer sunlight. Tumor onset was accelerated in all UVB-, but only half of UVA- irradiated mice as compared to unirradiated controls. Melanomas from both mouse models, harbored recurrent mutations affecting the RING domain of MAP3K1 and Actin-binding domain of Filamin A irrespective of UV status. Melanomas from UVB-irradiated, Braf-mutant mice averaged twice as many SNVs (1,025 vs. 435) and five times as many dipyrimidine variants (33.3 vs. 5.7) than tumors from similarly irradiated Nras-mutant mice. We identified a mutational signature enriched in UVB-accelerated tumors which mirrored COSMIC signatures associated with human skin cancer. Notably, this signature was enriched to a greater extent in Braf- than Nras-mutant murine melanomas. These data suggest that oncogenic BRAF may enhance UVB carcinogenesis to promote melanoma formation at anatomic sites with low or intermittent sun exposure.

cancer biology↗

Stag1 and Stag2 regulate cell fate decisions in hematopoiesis through non-redundant topological control

Transcriptional regulators, including the cohesin complex member STAG2, are recurrently mutated in cancer. The role of STAG2 in gene regulation, hematopoiesis, and tumor suppression remains unresolved. We show Stag2 deletion in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC) results in altered hematopoietic function, increased self-renewal, and impaired differentiation. ChIP-sequencing revealed that while Stag2 and Stag1 can bind the same loci, a component of Stag2 binding sites are unoccupied by Stag1 even in Stag2-deficient HSPCs. While concurrent loss of Stag2 and Stag1 abrogated hematopoiesis, Stag2 loss alone decreased chromatin accessibility and transcription of lineage-specification genes, including Ebf1 and Pax5, leading to blunted HSPC commitment to the B-cell lineage. Our data illustrate a role for Stag2 in transformation and transcriptional dysregulation distinct from its shared role with Stag1 in chromosomal segregation.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryStag1 rescues topologically associated domains in the absence of Stag2, but cannot restore chromatin architecture required for hematopoietic lineage commitment

cell biology↗